Cargando…
Investigating Effects of Tulathromycin Metaphylaxis on the Fecal Resistome and Microbiome of Commercial Feedlot Cattle Early in the Feeding Period
The objective was to examine effects of treating commercial beef feedlot cattle with therapeutic doses of tulathromycin, a macrolide antimicrobial drug, on changes in the fecal resistome and microbiome using shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Two pens of cattle were used, with all cattle in one pen rec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30105011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01715 |
_version_ | 1783344865481850880 |
---|---|
author | Doster, Enrique Rovira, Pablo Noyes, Noelle R. Burgess, Brandy A. Yang, Xiang Weinroth, Margaret D. Lakin, Steven M. Dean, Christopher J. Linke, Lyndsey Magnuson, Roberta Jones, Kenneth I. Boucher, Christina Ruiz, Jamie Belk, Keith E. Morley, Paul S. |
author_facet | Doster, Enrique Rovira, Pablo Noyes, Noelle R. Burgess, Brandy A. Yang, Xiang Weinroth, Margaret D. Lakin, Steven M. Dean, Christopher J. Linke, Lyndsey Magnuson, Roberta Jones, Kenneth I. Boucher, Christina Ruiz, Jamie Belk, Keith E. Morley, Paul S. |
author_sort | Doster, Enrique |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective was to examine effects of treating commercial beef feedlot cattle with therapeutic doses of tulathromycin, a macrolide antimicrobial drug, on changes in the fecal resistome and microbiome using shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Two pens of cattle were used, with all cattle in one pen receiving metaphylaxis treatment (800 mg subcutaneous tulathromycin) at arrival to the feedlot, and all cattle in the other pen remaining unexposed to parenteral antibiotics throughout the study period. Fecal samples were collected from 15 selected cattle in each group just prior to treatment (Day 1), and again 11 days later (Day 11). Shotgun sequencing was performed on isolated metagenomic DNA, and reads were aligned to a resistance and a taxonomic database to identify alignments to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene accessions and microbiome content. Overall, we identified AMR genes accessions encompassing 9 classes of AMR drugs and encoding 24 unique AMR mechanisms. Statistical analysis was used to identify differences in the resistome and microbiome between the untreated and treated groups at both timepoints, as well as over time. Based on composition and ordination analyses, the resistome and microbiome were not significantly different between the two groups on Day 1 or on Day 11. However, both the resistome and microbiome changed significantly between these two sampling dates. These results indicate that the transition into the feedlot—and associated changes in diet, geography, conspecific exposure, and environment—may exert a greater influence over the fecal resistome and microbiome of feedlot cattle than common metaphylactic antimicrobial drug treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6077226 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60772262018-08-13 Investigating Effects of Tulathromycin Metaphylaxis on the Fecal Resistome and Microbiome of Commercial Feedlot Cattle Early in the Feeding Period Doster, Enrique Rovira, Pablo Noyes, Noelle R. Burgess, Brandy A. Yang, Xiang Weinroth, Margaret D. Lakin, Steven M. Dean, Christopher J. Linke, Lyndsey Magnuson, Roberta Jones, Kenneth I. Boucher, Christina Ruiz, Jamie Belk, Keith E. Morley, Paul S. Front Microbiol Microbiology The objective was to examine effects of treating commercial beef feedlot cattle with therapeutic doses of tulathromycin, a macrolide antimicrobial drug, on changes in the fecal resistome and microbiome using shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Two pens of cattle were used, with all cattle in one pen receiving metaphylaxis treatment (800 mg subcutaneous tulathromycin) at arrival to the feedlot, and all cattle in the other pen remaining unexposed to parenteral antibiotics throughout the study period. Fecal samples were collected from 15 selected cattle in each group just prior to treatment (Day 1), and again 11 days later (Day 11). Shotgun sequencing was performed on isolated metagenomic DNA, and reads were aligned to a resistance and a taxonomic database to identify alignments to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene accessions and microbiome content. Overall, we identified AMR genes accessions encompassing 9 classes of AMR drugs and encoding 24 unique AMR mechanisms. Statistical analysis was used to identify differences in the resistome and microbiome between the untreated and treated groups at both timepoints, as well as over time. Based on composition and ordination analyses, the resistome and microbiome were not significantly different between the two groups on Day 1 or on Day 11. However, both the resistome and microbiome changed significantly between these two sampling dates. These results indicate that the transition into the feedlot—and associated changes in diet, geography, conspecific exposure, and environment—may exert a greater influence over the fecal resistome and microbiome of feedlot cattle than common metaphylactic antimicrobial drug treatment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6077226/ /pubmed/30105011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01715 Text en Copyright © 2018 Doster, Rovira, Noyes, Burgess, Yang, Weinroth, Lakin, Dean, Linke, Magnuson, Jones, Boucher, Ruiz, Belk and Morley. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Doster, Enrique Rovira, Pablo Noyes, Noelle R. Burgess, Brandy A. Yang, Xiang Weinroth, Margaret D. Lakin, Steven M. Dean, Christopher J. Linke, Lyndsey Magnuson, Roberta Jones, Kenneth I. Boucher, Christina Ruiz, Jamie Belk, Keith E. Morley, Paul S. Investigating Effects of Tulathromycin Metaphylaxis on the Fecal Resistome and Microbiome of Commercial Feedlot Cattle Early in the Feeding Period |
title | Investigating Effects of Tulathromycin Metaphylaxis on the Fecal Resistome and Microbiome of Commercial Feedlot Cattle Early in the Feeding Period |
title_full | Investigating Effects of Tulathromycin Metaphylaxis on the Fecal Resistome and Microbiome of Commercial Feedlot Cattle Early in the Feeding Period |
title_fullStr | Investigating Effects of Tulathromycin Metaphylaxis on the Fecal Resistome and Microbiome of Commercial Feedlot Cattle Early in the Feeding Period |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigating Effects of Tulathromycin Metaphylaxis on the Fecal Resistome and Microbiome of Commercial Feedlot Cattle Early in the Feeding Period |
title_short | Investigating Effects of Tulathromycin Metaphylaxis on the Fecal Resistome and Microbiome of Commercial Feedlot Cattle Early in the Feeding Period |
title_sort | investigating effects of tulathromycin metaphylaxis on the fecal resistome and microbiome of commercial feedlot cattle early in the feeding period |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30105011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01715 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dosterenrique investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod AT rovirapablo investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod AT noyesnoeller investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod AT burgessbrandya investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod AT yangxiang investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod AT weinrothmargaretd investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod AT lakinstevenm investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod AT deanchristopherj investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod AT linkelyndsey investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod AT magnusonroberta investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod AT joneskennethi investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod AT boucherchristina investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod AT ruizjamie investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod AT belkkeithe investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod AT morleypauls investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod |