Cargando…

Investigating Effects of Tulathromycin Metaphylaxis on the Fecal Resistome and Microbiome of Commercial Feedlot Cattle Early in the Feeding Period

The objective was to examine effects of treating commercial beef feedlot cattle with therapeutic doses of tulathromycin, a macrolide antimicrobial drug, on changes in the fecal resistome and microbiome using shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Two pens of cattle were used, with all cattle in one pen rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doster, Enrique, Rovira, Pablo, Noyes, Noelle R., Burgess, Brandy A., Yang, Xiang, Weinroth, Margaret D., Lakin, Steven M., Dean, Christopher J., Linke, Lyndsey, Magnuson, Roberta, Jones, Kenneth I., Boucher, Christina, Ruiz, Jamie, Belk, Keith E., Morley, Paul S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30105011
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01715
_version_ 1783344865481850880
author Doster, Enrique
Rovira, Pablo
Noyes, Noelle R.
Burgess, Brandy A.
Yang, Xiang
Weinroth, Margaret D.
Lakin, Steven M.
Dean, Christopher J.
Linke, Lyndsey
Magnuson, Roberta
Jones, Kenneth I.
Boucher, Christina
Ruiz, Jamie
Belk, Keith E.
Morley, Paul S.
author_facet Doster, Enrique
Rovira, Pablo
Noyes, Noelle R.
Burgess, Brandy A.
Yang, Xiang
Weinroth, Margaret D.
Lakin, Steven M.
Dean, Christopher J.
Linke, Lyndsey
Magnuson, Roberta
Jones, Kenneth I.
Boucher, Christina
Ruiz, Jamie
Belk, Keith E.
Morley, Paul S.
author_sort Doster, Enrique
collection PubMed
description The objective was to examine effects of treating commercial beef feedlot cattle with therapeutic doses of tulathromycin, a macrolide antimicrobial drug, on changes in the fecal resistome and microbiome using shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Two pens of cattle were used, with all cattle in one pen receiving metaphylaxis treatment (800 mg subcutaneous tulathromycin) at arrival to the feedlot, and all cattle in the other pen remaining unexposed to parenteral antibiotics throughout the study period. Fecal samples were collected from 15 selected cattle in each group just prior to treatment (Day 1), and again 11 days later (Day 11). Shotgun sequencing was performed on isolated metagenomic DNA, and reads were aligned to a resistance and a taxonomic database to identify alignments to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene accessions and microbiome content. Overall, we identified AMR genes accessions encompassing 9 classes of AMR drugs and encoding 24 unique AMR mechanisms. Statistical analysis was used to identify differences in the resistome and microbiome between the untreated and treated groups at both timepoints, as well as over time. Based on composition and ordination analyses, the resistome and microbiome were not significantly different between the two groups on Day 1 or on Day 11. However, both the resistome and microbiome changed significantly between these two sampling dates. These results indicate that the transition into the feedlot—and associated changes in diet, geography, conspecific exposure, and environment—may exert a greater influence over the fecal resistome and microbiome of feedlot cattle than common metaphylactic antimicrobial drug treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6077226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60772262018-08-13 Investigating Effects of Tulathromycin Metaphylaxis on the Fecal Resistome and Microbiome of Commercial Feedlot Cattle Early in the Feeding Period Doster, Enrique Rovira, Pablo Noyes, Noelle R. Burgess, Brandy A. Yang, Xiang Weinroth, Margaret D. Lakin, Steven M. Dean, Christopher J. Linke, Lyndsey Magnuson, Roberta Jones, Kenneth I. Boucher, Christina Ruiz, Jamie Belk, Keith E. Morley, Paul S. Front Microbiol Microbiology The objective was to examine effects of treating commercial beef feedlot cattle with therapeutic doses of tulathromycin, a macrolide antimicrobial drug, on changes in the fecal resistome and microbiome using shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Two pens of cattle were used, with all cattle in one pen receiving metaphylaxis treatment (800 mg subcutaneous tulathromycin) at arrival to the feedlot, and all cattle in the other pen remaining unexposed to parenteral antibiotics throughout the study period. Fecal samples were collected from 15 selected cattle in each group just prior to treatment (Day 1), and again 11 days later (Day 11). Shotgun sequencing was performed on isolated metagenomic DNA, and reads were aligned to a resistance and a taxonomic database to identify alignments to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene accessions and microbiome content. Overall, we identified AMR genes accessions encompassing 9 classes of AMR drugs and encoding 24 unique AMR mechanisms. Statistical analysis was used to identify differences in the resistome and microbiome between the untreated and treated groups at both timepoints, as well as over time. Based on composition and ordination analyses, the resistome and microbiome were not significantly different between the two groups on Day 1 or on Day 11. However, both the resistome and microbiome changed significantly between these two sampling dates. These results indicate that the transition into the feedlot—and associated changes in diet, geography, conspecific exposure, and environment—may exert a greater influence over the fecal resistome and microbiome of feedlot cattle than common metaphylactic antimicrobial drug treatment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6077226/ /pubmed/30105011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01715 Text en Copyright © 2018 Doster, Rovira, Noyes, Burgess, Yang, Weinroth, Lakin, Dean, Linke, Magnuson, Jones, Boucher, Ruiz, Belk and Morley. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Doster, Enrique
Rovira, Pablo
Noyes, Noelle R.
Burgess, Brandy A.
Yang, Xiang
Weinroth, Margaret D.
Lakin, Steven M.
Dean, Christopher J.
Linke, Lyndsey
Magnuson, Roberta
Jones, Kenneth I.
Boucher, Christina
Ruiz, Jamie
Belk, Keith E.
Morley, Paul S.
Investigating Effects of Tulathromycin Metaphylaxis on the Fecal Resistome and Microbiome of Commercial Feedlot Cattle Early in the Feeding Period
title Investigating Effects of Tulathromycin Metaphylaxis on the Fecal Resistome and Microbiome of Commercial Feedlot Cattle Early in the Feeding Period
title_full Investigating Effects of Tulathromycin Metaphylaxis on the Fecal Resistome and Microbiome of Commercial Feedlot Cattle Early in the Feeding Period
title_fullStr Investigating Effects of Tulathromycin Metaphylaxis on the Fecal Resistome and Microbiome of Commercial Feedlot Cattle Early in the Feeding Period
title_full_unstemmed Investigating Effects of Tulathromycin Metaphylaxis on the Fecal Resistome and Microbiome of Commercial Feedlot Cattle Early in the Feeding Period
title_short Investigating Effects of Tulathromycin Metaphylaxis on the Fecal Resistome and Microbiome of Commercial Feedlot Cattle Early in the Feeding Period
title_sort investigating effects of tulathromycin metaphylaxis on the fecal resistome and microbiome of commercial feedlot cattle early in the feeding period
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30105011
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01715
work_keys_str_mv AT dosterenrique investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod
AT rovirapablo investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod
AT noyesnoeller investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod
AT burgessbrandya investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod
AT yangxiang investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod
AT weinrothmargaretd investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod
AT lakinstevenm investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod
AT deanchristopherj investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod
AT linkelyndsey investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod
AT magnusonroberta investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod
AT joneskennethi investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod
AT boucherchristina investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod
AT ruizjamie investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod
AT belkkeithe investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod
AT morleypauls investigatingeffectsoftulathromycinmetaphylaxisonthefecalresistomeandmicrobiomeofcommercialfeedlotcattleearlyinthefeedingperiod