Cargando…
Beyond Cognition: Experts’ Views on Affective-Motivational Research Dispositions in the Social Sciences
Research competence (RC) as a key ability of students in the social sciences has thus far been conceptualized as consisting primarily of cognitive dispositions. However, owing to its highly complex and demanding nature, competence in conducting research might require additional affective and motivat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30104991 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01300 |
_version_ | 1783344887569055744 |
---|---|
author | Wessels, Insa Rueß, Julia Jenßen, Lars Gess, Christopher Deicke, Wolfgang |
author_facet | Wessels, Insa Rueß, Julia Jenßen, Lars Gess, Christopher Deicke, Wolfgang |
author_sort | Wessels, Insa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Research competence (RC) as a key ability of students in the social sciences has thus far been conceptualized as consisting primarily of cognitive dispositions. However, owing to its highly complex and demanding nature, competence in conducting research might require additional affective and motivational dispositions. To address this deficiency in the literature, first, we conducted a qualitative interview study with academic experts (N = 16) in which we asked them to identify challenging research situations and the affective-motivational research dispositions needed to cope with them. We employed a subsequent online rating (N = 27) to evaluate the situations and dispositions that had been identified. The resulting affective-motivational facet of RC encompasses six challenging situations that are often encountered and nine dispositions that are necessary to successfully conduct research in the social sciences and may be used to both inform and evaluate research-based learning. The interview-based approach may serve as an exemplary procedure to postulate affective-motivational facets of competence models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6077320 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60773202018-08-13 Beyond Cognition: Experts’ Views on Affective-Motivational Research Dispositions in the Social Sciences Wessels, Insa Rueß, Julia Jenßen, Lars Gess, Christopher Deicke, Wolfgang Front Psychol Psychology Research competence (RC) as a key ability of students in the social sciences has thus far been conceptualized as consisting primarily of cognitive dispositions. However, owing to its highly complex and demanding nature, competence in conducting research might require additional affective and motivational dispositions. To address this deficiency in the literature, first, we conducted a qualitative interview study with academic experts (N = 16) in which we asked them to identify challenging research situations and the affective-motivational research dispositions needed to cope with them. We employed a subsequent online rating (N = 27) to evaluate the situations and dispositions that had been identified. The resulting affective-motivational facet of RC encompasses six challenging situations that are often encountered and nine dispositions that are necessary to successfully conduct research in the social sciences and may be used to both inform and evaluate research-based learning. The interview-based approach may serve as an exemplary procedure to postulate affective-motivational facets of competence models. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6077320/ /pubmed/30104991 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01300 Text en Copyright © 2018 Wessels, Rueß, Jenßen, Gess and Deicke. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Wessels, Insa Rueß, Julia Jenßen, Lars Gess, Christopher Deicke, Wolfgang Beyond Cognition: Experts’ Views on Affective-Motivational Research Dispositions in the Social Sciences |
title | Beyond Cognition: Experts’ Views on Affective-Motivational Research Dispositions in the Social Sciences |
title_full | Beyond Cognition: Experts’ Views on Affective-Motivational Research Dispositions in the Social Sciences |
title_fullStr | Beyond Cognition: Experts’ Views on Affective-Motivational Research Dispositions in the Social Sciences |
title_full_unstemmed | Beyond Cognition: Experts’ Views on Affective-Motivational Research Dispositions in the Social Sciences |
title_short | Beyond Cognition: Experts’ Views on Affective-Motivational Research Dispositions in the Social Sciences |
title_sort | beyond cognition: experts’ views on affective-motivational research dispositions in the social sciences |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30104991 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01300 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wesselsinsa beyondcognitionexpertsviewsonaffectivemotivationalresearchdispositionsinthesocialsciences AT rueßjulia beyondcognitionexpertsviewsonaffectivemotivationalresearchdispositionsinthesocialsciences AT jenßenlars beyondcognitionexpertsviewsonaffectivemotivationalresearchdispositionsinthesocialsciences AT gesschristopher beyondcognitionexpertsviewsonaffectivemotivationalresearchdispositionsinthesocialsciences AT deickewolfgang beyondcognitionexpertsviewsonaffectivemotivationalresearchdispositionsinthesocialsciences |