Cargando…

Beyond Cognition: Experts’ Views on Affective-Motivational Research Dispositions in the Social Sciences

Research competence (RC) as a key ability of students in the social sciences has thus far been conceptualized as consisting primarily of cognitive dispositions. However, owing to its highly complex and demanding nature, competence in conducting research might require additional affective and motivat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wessels, Insa, Rueß, Julia, Jenßen, Lars, Gess, Christopher, Deicke, Wolfgang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30104991
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01300
_version_ 1783344887569055744
author Wessels, Insa
Rueß, Julia
Jenßen, Lars
Gess, Christopher
Deicke, Wolfgang
author_facet Wessels, Insa
Rueß, Julia
Jenßen, Lars
Gess, Christopher
Deicke, Wolfgang
author_sort Wessels, Insa
collection PubMed
description Research competence (RC) as a key ability of students in the social sciences has thus far been conceptualized as consisting primarily of cognitive dispositions. However, owing to its highly complex and demanding nature, competence in conducting research might require additional affective and motivational dispositions. To address this deficiency in the literature, first, we conducted a qualitative interview study with academic experts (N = 16) in which we asked them to identify challenging research situations and the affective-motivational research dispositions needed to cope with them. We employed a subsequent online rating (N = 27) to evaluate the situations and dispositions that had been identified. The resulting affective-motivational facet of RC encompasses six challenging situations that are often encountered and nine dispositions that are necessary to successfully conduct research in the social sciences and may be used to both inform and evaluate research-based learning. The interview-based approach may serve as an exemplary procedure to postulate affective-motivational facets of competence models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6077320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60773202018-08-13 Beyond Cognition: Experts’ Views on Affective-Motivational Research Dispositions in the Social Sciences Wessels, Insa Rueß, Julia Jenßen, Lars Gess, Christopher Deicke, Wolfgang Front Psychol Psychology Research competence (RC) as a key ability of students in the social sciences has thus far been conceptualized as consisting primarily of cognitive dispositions. However, owing to its highly complex and demanding nature, competence in conducting research might require additional affective and motivational dispositions. To address this deficiency in the literature, first, we conducted a qualitative interview study with academic experts (N = 16) in which we asked them to identify challenging research situations and the affective-motivational research dispositions needed to cope with them. We employed a subsequent online rating (N = 27) to evaluate the situations and dispositions that had been identified. The resulting affective-motivational facet of RC encompasses six challenging situations that are often encountered and nine dispositions that are necessary to successfully conduct research in the social sciences and may be used to both inform and evaluate research-based learning. The interview-based approach may serve as an exemplary procedure to postulate affective-motivational facets of competence models. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6077320/ /pubmed/30104991 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01300 Text en Copyright © 2018 Wessels, Rueß, Jenßen, Gess and Deicke. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Wessels, Insa
Rueß, Julia
Jenßen, Lars
Gess, Christopher
Deicke, Wolfgang
Beyond Cognition: Experts’ Views on Affective-Motivational Research Dispositions in the Social Sciences
title Beyond Cognition: Experts’ Views on Affective-Motivational Research Dispositions in the Social Sciences
title_full Beyond Cognition: Experts’ Views on Affective-Motivational Research Dispositions in the Social Sciences
title_fullStr Beyond Cognition: Experts’ Views on Affective-Motivational Research Dispositions in the Social Sciences
title_full_unstemmed Beyond Cognition: Experts’ Views on Affective-Motivational Research Dispositions in the Social Sciences
title_short Beyond Cognition: Experts’ Views on Affective-Motivational Research Dispositions in the Social Sciences
title_sort beyond cognition: experts’ views on affective-motivational research dispositions in the social sciences
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30104991
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01300
work_keys_str_mv AT wesselsinsa beyondcognitionexpertsviewsonaffectivemotivationalresearchdispositionsinthesocialsciences
AT rueßjulia beyondcognitionexpertsviewsonaffectivemotivationalresearchdispositionsinthesocialsciences
AT jenßenlars beyondcognitionexpertsviewsonaffectivemotivationalresearchdispositionsinthesocialsciences
AT gesschristopher beyondcognitionexpertsviewsonaffectivemotivationalresearchdispositionsinthesocialsciences
AT deickewolfgang beyondcognitionexpertsviewsonaffectivemotivationalresearchdispositionsinthesocialsciences