Cargando…

A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

BACKGROUND: Traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) is a common disease that has high complication, disability, and mortality rates and a poor prognosis. Tracheostomy is an important supportive therapy for patients with CSCI. However, a consensus on the predictive factors for tracheostomy after...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yan, Guo, Zhiliang, Fan, Dehong, Lu, Haijiang, Xie, Dong, Zhang, Dahai, Jiang, Yongtian, Li, Pei, Teng, Haijun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30112403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5895830
_version_ 1783344964844912640
author Wang, Yan
Guo, Zhiliang
Fan, Dehong
Lu, Haijiang
Xie, Dong
Zhang, Dahai
Jiang, Yongtian
Li, Pei
Teng, Haijun
author_facet Wang, Yan
Guo, Zhiliang
Fan, Dehong
Lu, Haijiang
Xie, Dong
Zhang, Dahai
Jiang, Yongtian
Li, Pei
Teng, Haijun
author_sort Wang, Yan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) is a common disease that has high complication, disability, and mortality rates and a poor prognosis. Tracheostomy is an important supportive therapy for patients with CSCI. However, a consensus on the predictive factors for tracheostomy after CSCI has not been reached. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis study assessed the influencing factors for tracheostomy after CSCI. METHODS: We searched for relevant studies on the influencing factors for tracheostomy after CSCI. The extracted data were analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Sixteen eligible studies containing 9697 patients with CSCI were selected. The pooled OR (MD) and 95% CI of the influencing factors were as follows: age (mean ± SD): -0.98 (-4.00 to 2.03), advanced age: 1.93 (0.80 to 4.63), sex (male): 1.29 (1.12 to 1.49), American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A grade: 7.79 (5.28 to 11.50), AIS B grade: 1.15 (1.13 to 2.02), AIS C grade: 0.28 (0.20 to 0.41), AIS D grade: 0.04 (0.02 to 0.09), neurological level of injury (upper CSCI): 2.36 (1.51 to 3.68), injury severity score (ISS): 8.97 (8.11 to 9.82), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤8: 6.03 (2.19 to 16.61), thoracic injury: 1.78 (1.55 to 2.04), brain injury: 0.96 (0.55 to 1.69), respiratory complications: 5.97 (4.03 to 8.86), smoking history: 1.45 (0.99 to 2.13), traffic accident injury: 1.27 (0.92 to 1.74), and fall injury: 0.72 (0.52 to 1.01). CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence shows that male sex, AIS A grade, AIS B grade, neurological level of injury (upper CSCI), high ISS, GCS≤8, thoracic injury, and respiratory complications are risk factors for tracheostomy after CSCI, and AIS C grade and AIS D grade are protective factors. This study will allow us to use these factors for tracheostomy decisions and ultimately optimize airway management in patients with CSCI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6077662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60776622018-08-15 A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Wang, Yan Guo, Zhiliang Fan, Dehong Lu, Haijiang Xie, Dong Zhang, Dahai Jiang, Yongtian Li, Pei Teng, Haijun Biomed Res Int Research Article BACKGROUND: Traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) is a common disease that has high complication, disability, and mortality rates and a poor prognosis. Tracheostomy is an important supportive therapy for patients with CSCI. However, a consensus on the predictive factors for tracheostomy after CSCI has not been reached. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis study assessed the influencing factors for tracheostomy after CSCI. METHODS: We searched for relevant studies on the influencing factors for tracheostomy after CSCI. The extracted data were analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Sixteen eligible studies containing 9697 patients with CSCI were selected. The pooled OR (MD) and 95% CI of the influencing factors were as follows: age (mean ± SD): -0.98 (-4.00 to 2.03), advanced age: 1.93 (0.80 to 4.63), sex (male): 1.29 (1.12 to 1.49), American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A grade: 7.79 (5.28 to 11.50), AIS B grade: 1.15 (1.13 to 2.02), AIS C grade: 0.28 (0.20 to 0.41), AIS D grade: 0.04 (0.02 to 0.09), neurological level of injury (upper CSCI): 2.36 (1.51 to 3.68), injury severity score (ISS): 8.97 (8.11 to 9.82), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤8: 6.03 (2.19 to 16.61), thoracic injury: 1.78 (1.55 to 2.04), brain injury: 0.96 (0.55 to 1.69), respiratory complications: 5.97 (4.03 to 8.86), smoking history: 1.45 (0.99 to 2.13), traffic accident injury: 1.27 (0.92 to 1.74), and fall injury: 0.72 (0.52 to 1.01). CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence shows that male sex, AIS A grade, AIS B grade, neurological level of injury (upper CSCI), high ISS, GCS≤8, thoracic injury, and respiratory complications are risk factors for tracheostomy after CSCI, and AIS C grade and AIS D grade are protective factors. This study will allow us to use these factors for tracheostomy decisions and ultimately optimize airway management in patients with CSCI. Hindawi 2018-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6077662/ /pubmed/30112403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5895830 Text en Copyright © 2018 Yan Wang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Yan
Guo, Zhiliang
Fan, Dehong
Lu, Haijiang
Xie, Dong
Zhang, Dahai
Jiang, Yongtian
Li, Pei
Teng, Haijun
A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
title A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
title_full A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
title_fullStr A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
title_full_unstemmed A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
title_short A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
title_sort meta-analysis of the influencing factors for tracheostomy after cervical spinal cord injury
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30112403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5895830
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyan ametaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury
AT guozhiliang ametaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury
AT fandehong ametaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury
AT luhaijiang ametaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury
AT xiedong ametaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury
AT zhangdahai ametaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury
AT jiangyongtian ametaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury
AT lipei ametaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury
AT tenghaijun ametaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury
AT wangyan metaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury
AT guozhiliang metaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury
AT fandehong metaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury
AT luhaijiang metaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury
AT xiedong metaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury
AT zhangdahai metaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury
AT jiangyongtian metaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury
AT lipei metaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury
AT tenghaijun metaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury