Cargando…
A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
BACKGROUND: Traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) is a common disease that has high complication, disability, and mortality rates and a poor prognosis. Tracheostomy is an important supportive therapy for patients with CSCI. However, a consensus on the predictive factors for tracheostomy after...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30112403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5895830 |
_version_ | 1783344964844912640 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Yan Guo, Zhiliang Fan, Dehong Lu, Haijiang Xie, Dong Zhang, Dahai Jiang, Yongtian Li, Pei Teng, Haijun |
author_facet | Wang, Yan Guo, Zhiliang Fan, Dehong Lu, Haijiang Xie, Dong Zhang, Dahai Jiang, Yongtian Li, Pei Teng, Haijun |
author_sort | Wang, Yan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) is a common disease that has high complication, disability, and mortality rates and a poor prognosis. Tracheostomy is an important supportive therapy for patients with CSCI. However, a consensus on the predictive factors for tracheostomy after CSCI has not been reached. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis study assessed the influencing factors for tracheostomy after CSCI. METHODS: We searched for relevant studies on the influencing factors for tracheostomy after CSCI. The extracted data were analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Sixteen eligible studies containing 9697 patients with CSCI were selected. The pooled OR (MD) and 95% CI of the influencing factors were as follows: age (mean ± SD): -0.98 (-4.00 to 2.03), advanced age: 1.93 (0.80 to 4.63), sex (male): 1.29 (1.12 to 1.49), American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A grade: 7.79 (5.28 to 11.50), AIS B grade: 1.15 (1.13 to 2.02), AIS C grade: 0.28 (0.20 to 0.41), AIS D grade: 0.04 (0.02 to 0.09), neurological level of injury (upper CSCI): 2.36 (1.51 to 3.68), injury severity score (ISS): 8.97 (8.11 to 9.82), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤8: 6.03 (2.19 to 16.61), thoracic injury: 1.78 (1.55 to 2.04), brain injury: 0.96 (0.55 to 1.69), respiratory complications: 5.97 (4.03 to 8.86), smoking history: 1.45 (0.99 to 2.13), traffic accident injury: 1.27 (0.92 to 1.74), and fall injury: 0.72 (0.52 to 1.01). CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence shows that male sex, AIS A grade, AIS B grade, neurological level of injury (upper CSCI), high ISS, GCS≤8, thoracic injury, and respiratory complications are risk factors for tracheostomy after CSCI, and AIS C grade and AIS D grade are protective factors. This study will allow us to use these factors for tracheostomy decisions and ultimately optimize airway management in patients with CSCI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6077662 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60776622018-08-15 A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Wang, Yan Guo, Zhiliang Fan, Dehong Lu, Haijiang Xie, Dong Zhang, Dahai Jiang, Yongtian Li, Pei Teng, Haijun Biomed Res Int Research Article BACKGROUND: Traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) is a common disease that has high complication, disability, and mortality rates and a poor prognosis. Tracheostomy is an important supportive therapy for patients with CSCI. However, a consensus on the predictive factors for tracheostomy after CSCI has not been reached. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis study assessed the influencing factors for tracheostomy after CSCI. METHODS: We searched for relevant studies on the influencing factors for tracheostomy after CSCI. The extracted data were analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Sixteen eligible studies containing 9697 patients with CSCI were selected. The pooled OR (MD) and 95% CI of the influencing factors were as follows: age (mean ± SD): -0.98 (-4.00 to 2.03), advanced age: 1.93 (0.80 to 4.63), sex (male): 1.29 (1.12 to 1.49), American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A grade: 7.79 (5.28 to 11.50), AIS B grade: 1.15 (1.13 to 2.02), AIS C grade: 0.28 (0.20 to 0.41), AIS D grade: 0.04 (0.02 to 0.09), neurological level of injury (upper CSCI): 2.36 (1.51 to 3.68), injury severity score (ISS): 8.97 (8.11 to 9.82), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤8: 6.03 (2.19 to 16.61), thoracic injury: 1.78 (1.55 to 2.04), brain injury: 0.96 (0.55 to 1.69), respiratory complications: 5.97 (4.03 to 8.86), smoking history: 1.45 (0.99 to 2.13), traffic accident injury: 1.27 (0.92 to 1.74), and fall injury: 0.72 (0.52 to 1.01). CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence shows that male sex, AIS A grade, AIS B grade, neurological level of injury (upper CSCI), high ISS, GCS≤8, thoracic injury, and respiratory complications are risk factors for tracheostomy after CSCI, and AIS C grade and AIS D grade are protective factors. This study will allow us to use these factors for tracheostomy decisions and ultimately optimize airway management in patients with CSCI. Hindawi 2018-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6077662/ /pubmed/30112403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5895830 Text en Copyright © 2018 Yan Wang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Yan Guo, Zhiliang Fan, Dehong Lu, Haijiang Xie, Dong Zhang, Dahai Jiang, Yongtian Li, Pei Teng, Haijun A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury |
title | A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury |
title_full | A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury |
title_fullStr | A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury |
title_full_unstemmed | A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury |
title_short | A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury |
title_sort | meta-analysis of the influencing factors for tracheostomy after cervical spinal cord injury |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30112403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5895830 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangyan ametaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury AT guozhiliang ametaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury AT fandehong ametaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury AT luhaijiang ametaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury AT xiedong ametaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury AT zhangdahai ametaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury AT jiangyongtian ametaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury AT lipei ametaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury AT tenghaijun ametaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury AT wangyan metaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury AT guozhiliang metaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury AT fandehong metaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury AT luhaijiang metaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury AT xiedong metaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury AT zhangdahai metaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury AT jiangyongtian metaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury AT lipei metaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury AT tenghaijun metaanalysisoftheinfluencingfactorsfortracheostomyaftercervicalspinalcordinjury |