Cargando…

Designing risk prediction models for ambulatory no-shows across different specialties and clinics

OBJECTIVE: As available data increases, so does the opportunity to develop risk scores on more refined patient populations. In this paper we assessed the ability to derive a risk score for a patient no-showing to a clinic visit. METHODS: Using data from 2 264 235 outpatient appointments we assessed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Xiruo, Gellad, Ziad F, Mather, Chad, Barth, Pamela, Poon, Eric G, Newman, Mark, Goldstein, Benjamin A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29444283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy002
_version_ 1783344979168460800
author Ding, Xiruo
Gellad, Ziad F
Mather, Chad
Barth, Pamela
Poon, Eric G
Newman, Mark
Goldstein, Benjamin A
author_facet Ding, Xiruo
Gellad, Ziad F
Mather, Chad
Barth, Pamela
Poon, Eric G
Newman, Mark
Goldstein, Benjamin A
author_sort Ding, Xiruo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: As available data increases, so does the opportunity to develop risk scores on more refined patient populations. In this paper we assessed the ability to derive a risk score for a patient no-showing to a clinic visit. METHODS: Using data from 2 264 235 outpatient appointments we assessed the performance of models built across 14 different specialties and 55 clinics. We used regularized logistic regression models to fit and assess models built on the health system, specialty, and clinic levels. We evaluated fits based on their discrimination and calibration. RESULTS: Overall, the results suggest that a relatively robust risk score for patient no-shows could be derived with an average C-statistic of 0.83 across clinic level models and strong calibration. Moreover, the clinic specific models, even with lower training set sizes, often performed better than the more general models. Examination of the individual models showed that risk factors had different degrees of predictability across the different specialties. Implementation of optimal modeling strategies would lead to capturing an additional 4819 no-shows per-year. CONCLUSION: Overall, this work highlights both the opportunity for and the importance of leveraging the available electronic health record data to develop more refined risk models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6077778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60777782018-08-09 Designing risk prediction models for ambulatory no-shows across different specialties and clinics Ding, Xiruo Gellad, Ziad F Mather, Chad Barth, Pamela Poon, Eric G Newman, Mark Goldstein, Benjamin A J Am Med Inform Assoc Research and Applications OBJECTIVE: As available data increases, so does the opportunity to develop risk scores on more refined patient populations. In this paper we assessed the ability to derive a risk score for a patient no-showing to a clinic visit. METHODS: Using data from 2 264 235 outpatient appointments we assessed the performance of models built across 14 different specialties and 55 clinics. We used regularized logistic regression models to fit and assess models built on the health system, specialty, and clinic levels. We evaluated fits based on their discrimination and calibration. RESULTS: Overall, the results suggest that a relatively robust risk score for patient no-shows could be derived with an average C-statistic of 0.83 across clinic level models and strong calibration. Moreover, the clinic specific models, even with lower training set sizes, often performed better than the more general models. Examination of the individual models showed that risk factors had different degrees of predictability across the different specialties. Implementation of optimal modeling strategies would lead to capturing an additional 4819 no-shows per-year. CONCLUSION: Overall, this work highlights both the opportunity for and the importance of leveraging the available electronic health record data to develop more refined risk models. Oxford University Press 2018-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6077778/ /pubmed/29444283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy002 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Research and Applications
Ding, Xiruo
Gellad, Ziad F
Mather, Chad
Barth, Pamela
Poon, Eric G
Newman, Mark
Goldstein, Benjamin A
Designing risk prediction models for ambulatory no-shows across different specialties and clinics
title Designing risk prediction models for ambulatory no-shows across different specialties and clinics
title_full Designing risk prediction models for ambulatory no-shows across different specialties and clinics
title_fullStr Designing risk prediction models for ambulatory no-shows across different specialties and clinics
title_full_unstemmed Designing risk prediction models for ambulatory no-shows across different specialties and clinics
title_short Designing risk prediction models for ambulatory no-shows across different specialties and clinics
title_sort designing risk prediction models for ambulatory no-shows across different specialties and clinics
topic Research and Applications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29444283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy002
work_keys_str_mv AT dingxiruo designingriskpredictionmodelsforambulatorynoshowsacrossdifferentspecialtiesandclinics
AT gelladziadf designingriskpredictionmodelsforambulatorynoshowsacrossdifferentspecialtiesandclinics
AT matherchad designingriskpredictionmodelsforambulatorynoshowsacrossdifferentspecialtiesandclinics
AT barthpamela designingriskpredictionmodelsforambulatorynoshowsacrossdifferentspecialtiesandclinics
AT poonericg designingriskpredictionmodelsforambulatorynoshowsacrossdifferentspecialtiesandclinics
AT newmanmark designingriskpredictionmodelsforambulatorynoshowsacrossdifferentspecialtiesandclinics
AT goldsteinbenjamina designingriskpredictionmodelsforambulatorynoshowsacrossdifferentspecialtiesandclinics