Cargando…

Objective and subjective measures of dalfampridine efficacy in clinical practice

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis affects mobility in over 80% of patients. Dalfampridine is the only approved treatment for walking impairment in multiple sclerosis. We assessed dalfampridine utilization in our practice and investigated response using timed 25 foot walk (T25FW) improvement and a patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klineova, Sylvia, Farber, Rebecca, Friedman, Joshua, Farrell, Colleen, Lublin, Fred D, Krieger, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30090641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055217318786742
_version_ 1783344999326285824
author Klineova, Sylvia
Farber, Rebecca
Friedman, Joshua
Farrell, Colleen
Lublin, Fred D
Krieger, Stephen
author_facet Klineova, Sylvia
Farber, Rebecca
Friedman, Joshua
Farrell, Colleen
Lublin, Fred D
Krieger, Stephen
author_sort Klineova, Sylvia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis affects mobility in over 80% of patients. Dalfampridine is the only approved treatment for walking impairment in multiple sclerosis. We assessed dalfampridine utilization in our practice and investigated response using timed 25 foot walk (T25FW) improvement and a patient-reported ambulation inventory. METHODS: Chart review identified patients with multiple sclerosis for whom dalfampridine was prescribed. T25FW data were extracted from medical records. Participants completed a dalfampridine-specific version of the multiple sclerosis walking scale (dMSWS-12) to assess the qualitative impact of dalfampridine on ambulation. We evaluated two responder categories: liberally defined as any improvement in T25FW; and over 20% T25FW improvement. RESULTS: The dMSWS-12 questionnaire was completed by 39 patients. Eighteen patients (46%) did not show any T25FW improvement. Of the 21 patients (54%) with T25FW improvement, four patients (11%) showed improvement greater than 20%. Analysis of dMSWS-12 scores showed a median score of 40 (range 12–60). Eleven patients (28%) showed no improvement (dMSWS-12 score ≤36). In contrast to objective T25FW improvement (54%), 28 patients (72%) reported improvement in walking ability (dMSWS-12 score ≥37). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that T25FW alone might not be sufficient for response characterization and that adding patient-reported measures may further elucidate the therapeutic response.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6077903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60779032018-08-08 Objective and subjective measures of dalfampridine efficacy in clinical practice Klineova, Sylvia Farber, Rebecca Friedman, Joshua Farrell, Colleen Lublin, Fred D Krieger, Stephen Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin Original Research Paper BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis affects mobility in over 80% of patients. Dalfampridine is the only approved treatment for walking impairment in multiple sclerosis. We assessed dalfampridine utilization in our practice and investigated response using timed 25 foot walk (T25FW) improvement and a patient-reported ambulation inventory. METHODS: Chart review identified patients with multiple sclerosis for whom dalfampridine was prescribed. T25FW data were extracted from medical records. Participants completed a dalfampridine-specific version of the multiple sclerosis walking scale (dMSWS-12) to assess the qualitative impact of dalfampridine on ambulation. We evaluated two responder categories: liberally defined as any improvement in T25FW; and over 20% T25FW improvement. RESULTS: The dMSWS-12 questionnaire was completed by 39 patients. Eighteen patients (46%) did not show any T25FW improvement. Of the 21 patients (54%) with T25FW improvement, four patients (11%) showed improvement greater than 20%. Analysis of dMSWS-12 scores showed a median score of 40 (range 12–60). Eleven patients (28%) showed no improvement (dMSWS-12 score ≤36). In contrast to objective T25FW improvement (54%), 28 patients (72%) reported improvement in walking ability (dMSWS-12 score ≥37). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that T25FW alone might not be sufficient for response characterization and that adding patient-reported measures may further elucidate the therapeutic response. SAGE Publications 2018-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6077903/ /pubmed/30090641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055217318786742 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Paper
Klineova, Sylvia
Farber, Rebecca
Friedman, Joshua
Farrell, Colleen
Lublin, Fred D
Krieger, Stephen
Objective and subjective measures of dalfampridine efficacy in clinical practice
title Objective and subjective measures of dalfampridine efficacy in clinical practice
title_full Objective and subjective measures of dalfampridine efficacy in clinical practice
title_fullStr Objective and subjective measures of dalfampridine efficacy in clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Objective and subjective measures of dalfampridine efficacy in clinical practice
title_short Objective and subjective measures of dalfampridine efficacy in clinical practice
title_sort objective and subjective measures of dalfampridine efficacy in clinical practice
topic Original Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30090641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055217318786742
work_keys_str_mv AT klineovasylvia objectiveandsubjectivemeasuresofdalfampridineefficacyinclinicalpractice
AT farberrebecca objectiveandsubjectivemeasuresofdalfampridineefficacyinclinicalpractice
AT friedmanjoshua objectiveandsubjectivemeasuresofdalfampridineefficacyinclinicalpractice
AT farrellcolleen objectiveandsubjectivemeasuresofdalfampridineefficacyinclinicalpractice
AT lublinfredd objectiveandsubjectivemeasuresofdalfampridineefficacyinclinicalpractice
AT kriegerstephen objectiveandsubjectivemeasuresofdalfampridineefficacyinclinicalpractice