Cargando…
Objective and subjective measures of dalfampridine efficacy in clinical practice
BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis affects mobility in over 80% of patients. Dalfampridine is the only approved treatment for walking impairment in multiple sclerosis. We assessed dalfampridine utilization in our practice and investigated response using timed 25 foot walk (T25FW) improvement and a patie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30090641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055217318786742 |
_version_ | 1783344999326285824 |
---|---|
author | Klineova, Sylvia Farber, Rebecca Friedman, Joshua Farrell, Colleen Lublin, Fred D Krieger, Stephen |
author_facet | Klineova, Sylvia Farber, Rebecca Friedman, Joshua Farrell, Colleen Lublin, Fred D Krieger, Stephen |
author_sort | Klineova, Sylvia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis affects mobility in over 80% of patients. Dalfampridine is the only approved treatment for walking impairment in multiple sclerosis. We assessed dalfampridine utilization in our practice and investigated response using timed 25 foot walk (T25FW) improvement and a patient-reported ambulation inventory. METHODS: Chart review identified patients with multiple sclerosis for whom dalfampridine was prescribed. T25FW data were extracted from medical records. Participants completed a dalfampridine-specific version of the multiple sclerosis walking scale (dMSWS-12) to assess the qualitative impact of dalfampridine on ambulation. We evaluated two responder categories: liberally defined as any improvement in T25FW; and over 20% T25FW improvement. RESULTS: The dMSWS-12 questionnaire was completed by 39 patients. Eighteen patients (46%) did not show any T25FW improvement. Of the 21 patients (54%) with T25FW improvement, four patients (11%) showed improvement greater than 20%. Analysis of dMSWS-12 scores showed a median score of 40 (range 12–60). Eleven patients (28%) showed no improvement (dMSWS-12 score ≤36). In contrast to objective T25FW improvement (54%), 28 patients (72%) reported improvement in walking ability (dMSWS-12 score ≥37). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that T25FW alone might not be sufficient for response characterization and that adding patient-reported measures may further elucidate the therapeutic response. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6077903 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60779032018-08-08 Objective and subjective measures of dalfampridine efficacy in clinical practice Klineova, Sylvia Farber, Rebecca Friedman, Joshua Farrell, Colleen Lublin, Fred D Krieger, Stephen Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin Original Research Paper BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis affects mobility in over 80% of patients. Dalfampridine is the only approved treatment for walking impairment in multiple sclerosis. We assessed dalfampridine utilization in our practice and investigated response using timed 25 foot walk (T25FW) improvement and a patient-reported ambulation inventory. METHODS: Chart review identified patients with multiple sclerosis for whom dalfampridine was prescribed. T25FW data were extracted from medical records. Participants completed a dalfampridine-specific version of the multiple sclerosis walking scale (dMSWS-12) to assess the qualitative impact of dalfampridine on ambulation. We evaluated two responder categories: liberally defined as any improvement in T25FW; and over 20% T25FW improvement. RESULTS: The dMSWS-12 questionnaire was completed by 39 patients. Eighteen patients (46%) did not show any T25FW improvement. Of the 21 patients (54%) with T25FW improvement, four patients (11%) showed improvement greater than 20%. Analysis of dMSWS-12 scores showed a median score of 40 (range 12–60). Eleven patients (28%) showed no improvement (dMSWS-12 score ≤36). In contrast to objective T25FW improvement (54%), 28 patients (72%) reported improvement in walking ability (dMSWS-12 score ≥37). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that T25FW alone might not be sufficient for response characterization and that adding patient-reported measures may further elucidate the therapeutic response. SAGE Publications 2018-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6077903/ /pubmed/30090641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055217318786742 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Paper Klineova, Sylvia Farber, Rebecca Friedman, Joshua Farrell, Colleen Lublin, Fred D Krieger, Stephen Objective and subjective measures of dalfampridine efficacy in clinical practice |
title | Objective and subjective measures of dalfampridine efficacy in clinical practice |
title_full | Objective and subjective measures of dalfampridine efficacy in clinical practice |
title_fullStr | Objective and subjective measures of dalfampridine efficacy in clinical practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Objective and subjective measures of dalfampridine efficacy in clinical practice |
title_short | Objective and subjective measures of dalfampridine efficacy in clinical practice |
title_sort | objective and subjective measures of dalfampridine efficacy in clinical practice |
topic | Original Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30090641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055217318786742 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klineovasylvia objectiveandsubjectivemeasuresofdalfampridineefficacyinclinicalpractice AT farberrebecca objectiveandsubjectivemeasuresofdalfampridineefficacyinclinicalpractice AT friedmanjoshua objectiveandsubjectivemeasuresofdalfampridineefficacyinclinicalpractice AT farrellcolleen objectiveandsubjectivemeasuresofdalfampridineefficacyinclinicalpractice AT lublinfredd objectiveandsubjectivemeasuresofdalfampridineefficacyinclinicalpractice AT kriegerstephen objectiveandsubjectivemeasuresofdalfampridineefficacyinclinicalpractice |