Cargando…
Evaluation of survival of 8 mm-length implants in posterior resorbed ridges: A pilot study
CONTEXT: Rehabilitation of jaws with reduced bone height is technically demanding and expensive. Short implants are emerging as an alternate in such cases. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the survival of implants of 8 mm in length (short implants), clinically and radiographically, in posterior res...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30131626 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_368_17 |
_version_ | 1783345010053218304 |
---|---|
author | Shilpa, Bangalore Sridhar Vasudevan, Seegavadi Dwarkanathan Bhongade, Manohar Laxman Baliga, Vidya Pakhare, Vikas Vilas Dhadse, Prasad Vijayrao |
author_facet | Shilpa, Bangalore Sridhar Vasudevan, Seegavadi Dwarkanathan Bhongade, Manohar Laxman Baliga, Vidya Pakhare, Vikas Vilas Dhadse, Prasad Vijayrao |
author_sort | Shilpa, Bangalore Sridhar |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Rehabilitation of jaws with reduced bone height is technically demanding and expensive. Short implants are emerging as an alternate in such cases. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the survival of implants of 8 mm in length (short implants), clinically and radiographically, in posterior resorbed ridges. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 11 patients with single missing posterior tooth, having 9–10 mm of residual bone height determined using radiographs, were selected for the study. Twelve implants of 8 mm length were inserted in the resorbed alveolar ridges following standard operating procedure. A second-stage surgery was performed 4–6 months after implant placement for placement of gingival former. This was followed by placement of prosthesis. Twelve months after prosthesis placement, all the patients were examined clinically and radiographically. RESULTS: According to Albrektsson et al.'s criteria, all implants were successful with mean bone loss of 1.1 ± 0.32 mm mesially and 0.83 ± 0.35 mm distally with healthy gingival condition at 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Short implants (8 mm in length) can be a viable alternative in cases of atrophic alveolar ridges. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6077961 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60779612018-08-21 Evaluation of survival of 8 mm-length implants in posterior resorbed ridges: A pilot study Shilpa, Bangalore Sridhar Vasudevan, Seegavadi Dwarkanathan Bhongade, Manohar Laxman Baliga, Vidya Pakhare, Vikas Vilas Dhadse, Prasad Vijayrao J Indian Soc Periodontol Original Article CONTEXT: Rehabilitation of jaws with reduced bone height is technically demanding and expensive. Short implants are emerging as an alternate in such cases. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the survival of implants of 8 mm in length (short implants), clinically and radiographically, in posterior resorbed ridges. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 11 patients with single missing posterior tooth, having 9–10 mm of residual bone height determined using radiographs, were selected for the study. Twelve implants of 8 mm length were inserted in the resorbed alveolar ridges following standard operating procedure. A second-stage surgery was performed 4–6 months after implant placement for placement of gingival former. This was followed by placement of prosthesis. Twelve months after prosthesis placement, all the patients were examined clinically and radiographically. RESULTS: According to Albrektsson et al.'s criteria, all implants were successful with mean bone loss of 1.1 ± 0.32 mm mesially and 0.83 ± 0.35 mm distally with healthy gingival condition at 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Short implants (8 mm in length) can be a viable alternative in cases of atrophic alveolar ridges. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6077961/ /pubmed/30131626 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_368_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shilpa, Bangalore Sridhar Vasudevan, Seegavadi Dwarkanathan Bhongade, Manohar Laxman Baliga, Vidya Pakhare, Vikas Vilas Dhadse, Prasad Vijayrao Evaluation of survival of 8 mm-length implants in posterior resorbed ridges: A pilot study |
title | Evaluation of survival of 8 mm-length implants in posterior resorbed ridges: A pilot study |
title_full | Evaluation of survival of 8 mm-length implants in posterior resorbed ridges: A pilot study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of survival of 8 mm-length implants in posterior resorbed ridges: A pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of survival of 8 mm-length implants in posterior resorbed ridges: A pilot study |
title_short | Evaluation of survival of 8 mm-length implants in posterior resorbed ridges: A pilot study |
title_sort | evaluation of survival of 8 mm-length implants in posterior resorbed ridges: a pilot study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30131626 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_368_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shilpabangaloresridhar evaluationofsurvivalof8mmlengthimplantsinposteriorresorbedridgesapilotstudy AT vasudevanseegavadidwarkanathan evaluationofsurvivalof8mmlengthimplantsinposteriorresorbedridgesapilotstudy AT bhongademanoharlaxman evaluationofsurvivalof8mmlengthimplantsinposteriorresorbedridgesapilotstudy AT baligavidya evaluationofsurvivalof8mmlengthimplantsinposteriorresorbedridgesapilotstudy AT pakharevikasvilas evaluationofsurvivalof8mmlengthimplantsinposteriorresorbedridgesapilotstudy AT dhadseprasadvijayrao evaluationofsurvivalof8mmlengthimplantsinposteriorresorbedridgesapilotstudy |