Cargando…

Evaluation of survival of 8 mm-length implants in posterior resorbed ridges: A pilot study

CONTEXT: Rehabilitation of jaws with reduced bone height is technically demanding and expensive. Short implants are emerging as an alternate in such cases. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the survival of implants of 8 mm in length (short implants), clinically and radiographically, in posterior res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shilpa, Bangalore Sridhar, Vasudevan, Seegavadi Dwarkanathan, Bhongade, Manohar Laxman, Baliga, Vidya, Pakhare, Vikas Vilas, Dhadse, Prasad Vijayrao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30131626
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_368_17
_version_ 1783345010053218304
author Shilpa, Bangalore Sridhar
Vasudevan, Seegavadi Dwarkanathan
Bhongade, Manohar Laxman
Baliga, Vidya
Pakhare, Vikas Vilas
Dhadse, Prasad Vijayrao
author_facet Shilpa, Bangalore Sridhar
Vasudevan, Seegavadi Dwarkanathan
Bhongade, Manohar Laxman
Baliga, Vidya
Pakhare, Vikas Vilas
Dhadse, Prasad Vijayrao
author_sort Shilpa, Bangalore Sridhar
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Rehabilitation of jaws with reduced bone height is technically demanding and expensive. Short implants are emerging as an alternate in such cases. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the survival of implants of 8 mm in length (short implants), clinically and radiographically, in posterior resorbed ridges. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 11 patients with single missing posterior tooth, having 9–10 mm of residual bone height determined using radiographs, were selected for the study. Twelve implants of 8 mm length were inserted in the resorbed alveolar ridges following standard operating procedure. A second-stage surgery was performed 4–6 months after implant placement for placement of gingival former. This was followed by placement of prosthesis. Twelve months after prosthesis placement, all the patients were examined clinically and radiographically. RESULTS: According to Albrektsson et al.'s criteria, all implants were successful with mean bone loss of 1.1 ± 0.32 mm mesially and 0.83 ± 0.35 mm distally with healthy gingival condition at 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Short implants (8 mm in length) can be a viable alternative in cases of atrophic alveolar ridges.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6077961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60779612018-08-21 Evaluation of survival of 8 mm-length implants in posterior resorbed ridges: A pilot study Shilpa, Bangalore Sridhar Vasudevan, Seegavadi Dwarkanathan Bhongade, Manohar Laxman Baliga, Vidya Pakhare, Vikas Vilas Dhadse, Prasad Vijayrao J Indian Soc Periodontol Original Article CONTEXT: Rehabilitation of jaws with reduced bone height is technically demanding and expensive. Short implants are emerging as an alternate in such cases. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the survival of implants of 8 mm in length (short implants), clinically and radiographically, in posterior resorbed ridges. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 11 patients with single missing posterior tooth, having 9–10 mm of residual bone height determined using radiographs, were selected for the study. Twelve implants of 8 mm length were inserted in the resorbed alveolar ridges following standard operating procedure. A second-stage surgery was performed 4–6 months after implant placement for placement of gingival former. This was followed by placement of prosthesis. Twelve months after prosthesis placement, all the patients were examined clinically and radiographically. RESULTS: According to Albrektsson et al.'s criteria, all implants were successful with mean bone loss of 1.1 ± 0.32 mm mesially and 0.83 ± 0.35 mm distally with healthy gingival condition at 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Short implants (8 mm in length) can be a viable alternative in cases of atrophic alveolar ridges. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6077961/ /pubmed/30131626 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_368_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shilpa, Bangalore Sridhar
Vasudevan, Seegavadi Dwarkanathan
Bhongade, Manohar Laxman
Baliga, Vidya
Pakhare, Vikas Vilas
Dhadse, Prasad Vijayrao
Evaluation of survival of 8 mm-length implants in posterior resorbed ridges: A pilot study
title Evaluation of survival of 8 mm-length implants in posterior resorbed ridges: A pilot study
title_full Evaluation of survival of 8 mm-length implants in posterior resorbed ridges: A pilot study
title_fullStr Evaluation of survival of 8 mm-length implants in posterior resorbed ridges: A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of survival of 8 mm-length implants in posterior resorbed ridges: A pilot study
title_short Evaluation of survival of 8 mm-length implants in posterior resorbed ridges: A pilot study
title_sort evaluation of survival of 8 mm-length implants in posterior resorbed ridges: a pilot study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6077961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30131626
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_368_17
work_keys_str_mv AT shilpabangaloresridhar evaluationofsurvivalof8mmlengthimplantsinposteriorresorbedridgesapilotstudy
AT vasudevanseegavadidwarkanathan evaluationofsurvivalof8mmlengthimplantsinposteriorresorbedridgesapilotstudy
AT bhongademanoharlaxman evaluationofsurvivalof8mmlengthimplantsinposteriorresorbedridgesapilotstudy
AT baligavidya evaluationofsurvivalof8mmlengthimplantsinposteriorresorbedridgesapilotstudy
AT pakharevikasvilas evaluationofsurvivalof8mmlengthimplantsinposteriorresorbedridgesapilotstudy
AT dhadseprasadvijayrao evaluationofsurvivalof8mmlengthimplantsinposteriorresorbedridgesapilotstudy