Cargando…
Inhaled Levosimendan versus Intravenous Levosimendan in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Mitral Valve Replacement
CONTEXT: Inhaled levosimendan may act as selective pulmonary vasodilator and avoid systemic side effects of intravenous levosimendan, which include decrease in systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and systemic hypotension, but with same beneficial effect on pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and right ve...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6078018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30052230 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_19_18 |
_version_ | 1783345017912295424 |
---|---|
author | Kundra, Tanveer Singh Nagaraja, P S Bharathi, K S Kaur, Parminder Manjunatha, N |
author_facet | Kundra, Tanveer Singh Nagaraja, P S Bharathi, K S Kaur, Parminder Manjunatha, N |
author_sort | Kundra, Tanveer Singh |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Inhaled levosimendan may act as selective pulmonary vasodilator and avoid systemic side effects of intravenous levosimendan, which include decrease in systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and systemic hypotension, but with same beneficial effect on pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and right ventricular (RV) function. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of inhaled levosimendan with intravenous levosimendan in patients with pulmonary hypertension undergoing mitral valve replacement. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The present prospective randomized comparative study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients were randomized into two groups (n = 25). Group A: Levosimendan infusion was started immediately after coming-off of cardiopulmonary bypass and continued for 24 h at 0.1 mcg/kg/min. Group B: Total dose of levosimendan which would be given through intravenous route over 24 h was calculated and then divided into four equal parts and administered through inhalational route 6(th) hourly over 24 h. Hemodynamic profile (pulse rate, mean arterial pressure, pulmonary artery systolic pressure [PASP], SVR) and RV function were assessed immediately after shifting, at 1, 8, 24, and 36 h after shifting to recovery. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Intragroup analysis was done using paired student t-test, and unpaired student t-test was used for analysis between two groups. RESULTS: PASP and RV-fractional area change (RV-FAC) were comparable in the two groups at different time intervals. There was a significant reduction in PASP and significant improvement in RV-FAC with both intravenous and inhalational levosimendan. SVR was significantly decreased with intravenous levosimendan, but no significant decrease in SVR was observed with inhalational levosimendan. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled levosimendan is a selective pulmonary vasodilator. It causes decrease in PAP and improvement in RV function, without having a significant effect on SVR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6078018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60780182018-08-21 Inhaled Levosimendan versus Intravenous Levosimendan in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Mitral Valve Replacement Kundra, Tanveer Singh Nagaraja, P S Bharathi, K S Kaur, Parminder Manjunatha, N Ann Card Anaesth Original Article: Janak Mehta Award CONTEXT: Inhaled levosimendan may act as selective pulmonary vasodilator and avoid systemic side effects of intravenous levosimendan, which include decrease in systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and systemic hypotension, but with same beneficial effect on pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and right ventricular (RV) function. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of inhaled levosimendan with intravenous levosimendan in patients with pulmonary hypertension undergoing mitral valve replacement. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The present prospective randomized comparative study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients were randomized into two groups (n = 25). Group A: Levosimendan infusion was started immediately after coming-off of cardiopulmonary bypass and continued for 24 h at 0.1 mcg/kg/min. Group B: Total dose of levosimendan which would be given through intravenous route over 24 h was calculated and then divided into four equal parts and administered through inhalational route 6(th) hourly over 24 h. Hemodynamic profile (pulse rate, mean arterial pressure, pulmonary artery systolic pressure [PASP], SVR) and RV function were assessed immediately after shifting, at 1, 8, 24, and 36 h after shifting to recovery. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Intragroup analysis was done using paired student t-test, and unpaired student t-test was used for analysis between two groups. RESULTS: PASP and RV-fractional area change (RV-FAC) were comparable in the two groups at different time intervals. There was a significant reduction in PASP and significant improvement in RV-FAC with both intravenous and inhalational levosimendan. SVR was significantly decreased with intravenous levosimendan, but no significant decrease in SVR was observed with inhalational levosimendan. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled levosimendan is a selective pulmonary vasodilator. It causes decrease in PAP and improvement in RV function, without having a significant effect on SVR. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6078018/ /pubmed/30052230 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_19_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article: Janak Mehta Award Kundra, Tanveer Singh Nagaraja, P S Bharathi, K S Kaur, Parminder Manjunatha, N Inhaled Levosimendan versus Intravenous Levosimendan in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Mitral Valve Replacement |
title | Inhaled Levosimendan versus Intravenous Levosimendan in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Mitral Valve Replacement |
title_full | Inhaled Levosimendan versus Intravenous Levosimendan in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Mitral Valve Replacement |
title_fullStr | Inhaled Levosimendan versus Intravenous Levosimendan in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Mitral Valve Replacement |
title_full_unstemmed | Inhaled Levosimendan versus Intravenous Levosimendan in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Mitral Valve Replacement |
title_short | Inhaled Levosimendan versus Intravenous Levosimendan in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Mitral Valve Replacement |
title_sort | inhaled levosimendan versus intravenous levosimendan in patients with pulmonary hypertension undergoing mitral valve replacement |
topic | Original Article: Janak Mehta Award |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6078018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30052230 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_19_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kundratanveersingh inhaledlevosimendanversusintravenouslevosimendaninpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionundergoingmitralvalvereplacement AT nagarajaps inhaledlevosimendanversusintravenouslevosimendaninpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionundergoingmitralvalvereplacement AT bharathiks inhaledlevosimendanversusintravenouslevosimendaninpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionundergoingmitralvalvereplacement AT kaurparminder inhaledlevosimendanversusintravenouslevosimendaninpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionundergoingmitralvalvereplacement AT manjunathan inhaledlevosimendanversusintravenouslevosimendaninpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionundergoingmitralvalvereplacement |