Cargando…

Non-invasive brain stimulation in chronic orofacial pain: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are non-invasive brain stimulation techniques that are being explored as therapeutic alternatives for the management of various chronic pain conditions. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this sys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herrero Babiloni, Alberto, Guay, Samuel, Nixdorf, Donald R, de Beaumont, Louis, Lavigne, Gilles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6078189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30122975
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S168705
_version_ 1783345050462191616
author Herrero Babiloni, Alberto
Guay, Samuel
Nixdorf, Donald R
de Beaumont, Louis
Lavigne, Gilles
author_facet Herrero Babiloni, Alberto
Guay, Samuel
Nixdorf, Donald R
de Beaumont, Louis
Lavigne, Gilles
author_sort Herrero Babiloni, Alberto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are non-invasive brain stimulation techniques that are being explored as therapeutic alternatives for the management of various chronic pain conditions. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy of TMS and tDCS in reducing clinical pain intensity in chronic orofacial pain (OFP) disorders. The secondary objectives are to describe adverse effects, duration of relief, and TMS/tDCS methodologies used in chronic OFP disorders. METHODS: A search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria were 1) population: adults diagnosed with chronic OFP including neuropathic and non-neuropathic disorders; 2) intervention: active TMS or tDCS stimulation regardless of the used protocol; 3) comparison: sham TMS or tDCS stimulation; and 4) outcome: primary outcome was patient reported pain intensity. Secondary outcomes were duration of pain relief, adverse effects, and methodological parameters. Risk of bias and quality of study reporting were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 556 individual citations were identified by the search strategy, with 14 articles meeting selection criteria (TMS=11; tDCS=3). Data were obtained for a total of 228 patients. Included OFP disorders were trigeminal neuralgia, trigeminal neuropathy, burning mouth syndrome, atypical facial pain, and temporomandibular disorders. Significant pain reductions were obtained in both techniques. More number of sessions yielded to more durable effects. Overall, high risk of bias and poor study quality were found. CONCLUSION: TMS and tDCS appear to be safe and promising alternatives to reduce pain intensity in different chronic OFP disorders. Additional research effort is needed to reduce bias, improve quality, and characterize optimal brain stimulation parameters to promote their efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6078189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60781892018-08-17 Non-invasive brain stimulation in chronic orofacial pain: a systematic review Herrero Babiloni, Alberto Guay, Samuel Nixdorf, Donald R de Beaumont, Louis Lavigne, Gilles J Pain Res Review BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are non-invasive brain stimulation techniques that are being explored as therapeutic alternatives for the management of various chronic pain conditions. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy of TMS and tDCS in reducing clinical pain intensity in chronic orofacial pain (OFP) disorders. The secondary objectives are to describe adverse effects, duration of relief, and TMS/tDCS methodologies used in chronic OFP disorders. METHODS: A search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria were 1) population: adults diagnosed with chronic OFP including neuropathic and non-neuropathic disorders; 2) intervention: active TMS or tDCS stimulation regardless of the used protocol; 3) comparison: sham TMS or tDCS stimulation; and 4) outcome: primary outcome was patient reported pain intensity. Secondary outcomes were duration of pain relief, adverse effects, and methodological parameters. Risk of bias and quality of study reporting were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 556 individual citations were identified by the search strategy, with 14 articles meeting selection criteria (TMS=11; tDCS=3). Data were obtained for a total of 228 patients. Included OFP disorders were trigeminal neuralgia, trigeminal neuropathy, burning mouth syndrome, atypical facial pain, and temporomandibular disorders. Significant pain reductions were obtained in both techniques. More number of sessions yielded to more durable effects. Overall, high risk of bias and poor study quality were found. CONCLUSION: TMS and tDCS appear to be safe and promising alternatives to reduce pain intensity in different chronic OFP disorders. Additional research effort is needed to reduce bias, improve quality, and characterize optimal brain stimulation parameters to promote their efficacy. Dove Medical Press 2018-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6078189/ /pubmed/30122975 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S168705 Text en © 2018 Herrero Babiloni et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Herrero Babiloni, Alberto
Guay, Samuel
Nixdorf, Donald R
de Beaumont, Louis
Lavigne, Gilles
Non-invasive brain stimulation in chronic orofacial pain: a systematic review
title Non-invasive brain stimulation in chronic orofacial pain: a systematic review
title_full Non-invasive brain stimulation in chronic orofacial pain: a systematic review
title_fullStr Non-invasive brain stimulation in chronic orofacial pain: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Non-invasive brain stimulation in chronic orofacial pain: a systematic review
title_short Non-invasive brain stimulation in chronic orofacial pain: a systematic review
title_sort non-invasive brain stimulation in chronic orofacial pain: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6078189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30122975
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S168705
work_keys_str_mv AT herrerobabilonialberto noninvasivebrainstimulationinchronicorofacialpainasystematicreview
AT guaysamuel noninvasivebrainstimulationinchronicorofacialpainasystematicreview
AT nixdorfdonaldr noninvasivebrainstimulationinchronicorofacialpainasystematicreview
AT debeaumontlouis noninvasivebrainstimulationinchronicorofacialpainasystematicreview
AT lavignegilles noninvasivebrainstimulationinchronicorofacialpainasystematicreview