Cargando…
Non-invasive brain stimulation in chronic orofacial pain: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are non-invasive brain stimulation techniques that are being explored as therapeutic alternatives for the management of various chronic pain conditions. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this sys...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6078189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30122975 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S168705 |
_version_ | 1783345050462191616 |
---|---|
author | Herrero Babiloni, Alberto Guay, Samuel Nixdorf, Donald R de Beaumont, Louis Lavigne, Gilles |
author_facet | Herrero Babiloni, Alberto Guay, Samuel Nixdorf, Donald R de Beaumont, Louis Lavigne, Gilles |
author_sort | Herrero Babiloni, Alberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are non-invasive brain stimulation techniques that are being explored as therapeutic alternatives for the management of various chronic pain conditions. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy of TMS and tDCS in reducing clinical pain intensity in chronic orofacial pain (OFP) disorders. The secondary objectives are to describe adverse effects, duration of relief, and TMS/tDCS methodologies used in chronic OFP disorders. METHODS: A search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria were 1) population: adults diagnosed with chronic OFP including neuropathic and non-neuropathic disorders; 2) intervention: active TMS or tDCS stimulation regardless of the used protocol; 3) comparison: sham TMS or tDCS stimulation; and 4) outcome: primary outcome was patient reported pain intensity. Secondary outcomes were duration of pain relief, adverse effects, and methodological parameters. Risk of bias and quality of study reporting were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 556 individual citations were identified by the search strategy, with 14 articles meeting selection criteria (TMS=11; tDCS=3). Data were obtained for a total of 228 patients. Included OFP disorders were trigeminal neuralgia, trigeminal neuropathy, burning mouth syndrome, atypical facial pain, and temporomandibular disorders. Significant pain reductions were obtained in both techniques. More number of sessions yielded to more durable effects. Overall, high risk of bias and poor study quality were found. CONCLUSION: TMS and tDCS appear to be safe and promising alternatives to reduce pain intensity in different chronic OFP disorders. Additional research effort is needed to reduce bias, improve quality, and characterize optimal brain stimulation parameters to promote their efficacy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6078189 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60781892018-08-17 Non-invasive brain stimulation in chronic orofacial pain: a systematic review Herrero Babiloni, Alberto Guay, Samuel Nixdorf, Donald R de Beaumont, Louis Lavigne, Gilles J Pain Res Review BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are non-invasive brain stimulation techniques that are being explored as therapeutic alternatives for the management of various chronic pain conditions. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy of TMS and tDCS in reducing clinical pain intensity in chronic orofacial pain (OFP) disorders. The secondary objectives are to describe adverse effects, duration of relief, and TMS/tDCS methodologies used in chronic OFP disorders. METHODS: A search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria were 1) population: adults diagnosed with chronic OFP including neuropathic and non-neuropathic disorders; 2) intervention: active TMS or tDCS stimulation regardless of the used protocol; 3) comparison: sham TMS or tDCS stimulation; and 4) outcome: primary outcome was patient reported pain intensity. Secondary outcomes were duration of pain relief, adverse effects, and methodological parameters. Risk of bias and quality of study reporting were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 556 individual citations were identified by the search strategy, with 14 articles meeting selection criteria (TMS=11; tDCS=3). Data were obtained for a total of 228 patients. Included OFP disorders were trigeminal neuralgia, trigeminal neuropathy, burning mouth syndrome, atypical facial pain, and temporomandibular disorders. Significant pain reductions were obtained in both techniques. More number of sessions yielded to more durable effects. Overall, high risk of bias and poor study quality were found. CONCLUSION: TMS and tDCS appear to be safe and promising alternatives to reduce pain intensity in different chronic OFP disorders. Additional research effort is needed to reduce bias, improve quality, and characterize optimal brain stimulation parameters to promote their efficacy. Dove Medical Press 2018-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6078189/ /pubmed/30122975 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S168705 Text en © 2018 Herrero Babiloni et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review Herrero Babiloni, Alberto Guay, Samuel Nixdorf, Donald R de Beaumont, Louis Lavigne, Gilles Non-invasive brain stimulation in chronic orofacial pain: a systematic review |
title | Non-invasive brain stimulation in chronic orofacial pain: a systematic review |
title_full | Non-invasive brain stimulation in chronic orofacial pain: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Non-invasive brain stimulation in chronic orofacial pain: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-invasive brain stimulation in chronic orofacial pain: a systematic review |
title_short | Non-invasive brain stimulation in chronic orofacial pain: a systematic review |
title_sort | non-invasive brain stimulation in chronic orofacial pain: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6078189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30122975 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S168705 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT herrerobabilonialberto noninvasivebrainstimulationinchronicorofacialpainasystematicreview AT guaysamuel noninvasivebrainstimulationinchronicorofacialpainasystematicreview AT nixdorfdonaldr noninvasivebrainstimulationinchronicorofacialpainasystematicreview AT debeaumontlouis noninvasivebrainstimulationinchronicorofacialpainasystematicreview AT lavignegilles noninvasivebrainstimulationinchronicorofacialpainasystematicreview |