Cargando…

In which groups of pregnant women can the caesarean delivery rate likely be reduced safely in the USA? A multicentre cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES: To identify obstetrical subgroups in which (1) the caesarean delivery (CD) rate may be reduced without compromising safety and (2) CD may be associated with better perinatal outcomes. DESIGN: A multicentre cross-sectional study. SETTING: 19 hospitals in the USA that participated in the C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Jin-Wen, Branch, Ware, Hoffman, Matthew, De Jonge, Ank, Li, Sheng-Hui, Troendle, James, Zhang, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6078266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30082355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021670
_version_ 1783345061166055424
author Zhang, Jin-Wen
Branch, Ware
Hoffman, Matthew
De Jonge, Ank
Li, Sheng-Hui
Troendle, James
Zhang, Jun
author_facet Zhang, Jin-Wen
Branch, Ware
Hoffman, Matthew
De Jonge, Ank
Li, Sheng-Hui
Troendle, James
Zhang, Jun
author_sort Zhang, Jin-Wen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To identify obstetrical subgroups in which (1) the caesarean delivery (CD) rate may be reduced without compromising safety and (2) CD may be associated with better perinatal outcomes. DESIGN: A multicentre cross-sectional study. SETTING: 19 hospitals in the USA that participated in the Consortium on Safe Labor. PARTICIPANTS: 228 562 pregnant women in 2002–2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maternal and neonatal safety was measured using the individual Weighted Adverse Outcome Score. METHODS: Women were divided into 10 subgroups according to a modified Robson classification system. Generalised estimated equation model was used to examine the relationships between mode of delivery and Weighted Adverse Outcome Score in each subgroup. RESULTS: The overall caesarean rate was 31.2%. Repeat CD contributed 29.5% of all CD, followed by nulliparas with labour induction (15.3%) and non-cephalic presentation (14.3%). The caesarean rates in induced nulliparas with a term singleton cephalic pregnancy and women with previous CD were 31.6% and 82.0%, respectively. CD had no clinically meaningful association with perinatal outcomes in most subgroups. However, in singleton preterm breech presentation and preterm twin gestation with the first twin in non-cephalic presentation, CD was associated with substantially improved maternal and perinatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Women with repeat CD, term non-cephalic presentation, term twins or other multiple gestation and preterm births may be the potential targets for safely reducing prelabour CD rate, while nulliparas or multiparas with spontaneous or induced labour, women with repeat CD, term non-cephalic presentation, term twins or other multiple gestation and preterm births are potential targets for reducing intrapartum CD rate without compromising maternal and neonatal safety in the USA. On the other hand, CD may still be associated with better perinatal outcomes in women with singleton preterm breech presentation or preterm twins with the first twin in non-cephalic presentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6078266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60782662018-08-09 In which groups of pregnant women can the caesarean delivery rate likely be reduced safely in the USA? A multicentre cross-sectional study Zhang, Jin-Wen Branch, Ware Hoffman, Matthew De Jonge, Ank Li, Sheng-Hui Troendle, James Zhang, Jun BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVES: To identify obstetrical subgroups in which (1) the caesarean delivery (CD) rate may be reduced without compromising safety and (2) CD may be associated with better perinatal outcomes. DESIGN: A multicentre cross-sectional study. SETTING: 19 hospitals in the USA that participated in the Consortium on Safe Labor. PARTICIPANTS: 228 562 pregnant women in 2002–2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maternal and neonatal safety was measured using the individual Weighted Adverse Outcome Score. METHODS: Women were divided into 10 subgroups according to a modified Robson classification system. Generalised estimated equation model was used to examine the relationships between mode of delivery and Weighted Adverse Outcome Score in each subgroup. RESULTS: The overall caesarean rate was 31.2%. Repeat CD contributed 29.5% of all CD, followed by nulliparas with labour induction (15.3%) and non-cephalic presentation (14.3%). The caesarean rates in induced nulliparas with a term singleton cephalic pregnancy and women with previous CD were 31.6% and 82.0%, respectively. CD had no clinically meaningful association with perinatal outcomes in most subgroups. However, in singleton preterm breech presentation and preterm twin gestation with the first twin in non-cephalic presentation, CD was associated with substantially improved maternal and perinatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Women with repeat CD, term non-cephalic presentation, term twins or other multiple gestation and preterm births may be the potential targets for safely reducing prelabour CD rate, while nulliparas or multiparas with spontaneous or induced labour, women with repeat CD, term non-cephalic presentation, term twins or other multiple gestation and preterm births are potential targets for reducing intrapartum CD rate without compromising maternal and neonatal safety in the USA. On the other hand, CD may still be associated with better perinatal outcomes in women with singleton preterm breech presentation or preterm twins with the first twin in non-cephalic presentation. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6078266/ /pubmed/30082355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021670 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Zhang, Jin-Wen
Branch, Ware
Hoffman, Matthew
De Jonge, Ank
Li, Sheng-Hui
Troendle, James
Zhang, Jun
In which groups of pregnant women can the caesarean delivery rate likely be reduced safely in the USA? A multicentre cross-sectional study
title In which groups of pregnant women can the caesarean delivery rate likely be reduced safely in the USA? A multicentre cross-sectional study
title_full In which groups of pregnant women can the caesarean delivery rate likely be reduced safely in the USA? A multicentre cross-sectional study
title_fullStr In which groups of pregnant women can the caesarean delivery rate likely be reduced safely in the USA? A multicentre cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed In which groups of pregnant women can the caesarean delivery rate likely be reduced safely in the USA? A multicentre cross-sectional study
title_short In which groups of pregnant women can the caesarean delivery rate likely be reduced safely in the USA? A multicentre cross-sectional study
title_sort in which groups of pregnant women can the caesarean delivery rate likely be reduced safely in the usa? a multicentre cross-sectional study
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6078266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30082355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021670
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjinwen inwhichgroupsofpregnantwomencanthecaesareandeliveryratelikelybereducedsafelyintheusaamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT branchware inwhichgroupsofpregnantwomencanthecaesareandeliveryratelikelybereducedsafelyintheusaamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT hoffmanmatthew inwhichgroupsofpregnantwomencanthecaesareandeliveryratelikelybereducedsafelyintheusaamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT dejongeank inwhichgroupsofpregnantwomencanthecaesareandeliveryratelikelybereducedsafelyintheusaamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT lishenghui inwhichgroupsofpregnantwomencanthecaesareandeliveryratelikelybereducedsafelyintheusaamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT troendlejames inwhichgroupsofpregnantwomencanthecaesareandeliveryratelikelybereducedsafelyintheusaamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy
AT zhangjun inwhichgroupsofpregnantwomencanthecaesareandeliveryratelikelybereducedsafelyintheusaamulticentrecrosssectionalstudy