Cargando…
Dengue infection in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Dengue is the most extensively spread mosquito-borne disease; endemic in more than 100 countries. Information about dengue disease burden, its prevalence, incidence and geographic distribution is critical in planning appropriate control measures against dengue fever. We conducted a sys...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6078327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30011275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006618 |
_version_ | 1783345073774133248 |
---|---|
author | Ganeshkumar, Parasuraman Murhekar, Manoj V. Poornima, Veeraraghavadoss Saravanakumar, Velusamy Sukumaran, Krishnendu Anandaselvasankar, Anandan John, Denny Mehendale, Sanjay M. |
author_facet | Ganeshkumar, Parasuraman Murhekar, Manoj V. Poornima, Veeraraghavadoss Saravanakumar, Velusamy Sukumaran, Krishnendu Anandaselvasankar, Anandan John, Denny Mehendale, Sanjay M. |
author_sort | Ganeshkumar, Parasuraman |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Dengue is the most extensively spread mosquito-borne disease; endemic in more than 100 countries. Information about dengue disease burden, its prevalence, incidence and geographic distribution is critical in planning appropriate control measures against dengue fever. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of dengue fever in India METHODS: We searched for studies published until 2017 reporting the incidence, the prevalence or case fatality of dengue in India. Our primary outcomes were (a) prevalence of laboratory confirmed dengue infection among clinically suspected patients, (b) seroprevalence in the general population and (c) case fatality ratio among laboratory confirmed dengue patients. We used binomial–normal mixed effects regression model to estimate the pooled proportion of dengue infections. Forest plots were used to display pooled estimates. The metafor package of R software was used to conduct meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of the 2285 identified articles on dengue, we included 233 in the analysis wherein 180 reported prevalence of laboratory confirmed dengue infection, seven reported seroprevalence as evidenced by IgG or neutralizing antibodies against dengue and 77 reported case fatality. The overall estimate of the prevalence of laboratory confirmed dengue infection among clinically suspected patients was 38.3% (95% CI: 34.8%–41.8%). The pooled estimate of dengue seroprevalence in the general population and CFR among laboratory confirmed patients was 56.9% (95% CI: 37.5–74.4) and 2.6% (95% CI: 2–3.4) respectively. There was significant heterogeneity in reported outcomes (p-values<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Identified gaps in the understanding of dengue epidemiology in India emphasize the need to initiate community-based cohort studies representing different geographic regions to generate reliable estimates of age-specific incidence of dengue and studies to generate dengue seroprevalence data in the country. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6078327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60783272018-08-28 Dengue infection in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis Ganeshkumar, Parasuraman Murhekar, Manoj V. Poornima, Veeraraghavadoss Saravanakumar, Velusamy Sukumaran, Krishnendu Anandaselvasankar, Anandan John, Denny Mehendale, Sanjay M. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article INTRODUCTION: Dengue is the most extensively spread mosquito-borne disease; endemic in more than 100 countries. Information about dengue disease burden, its prevalence, incidence and geographic distribution is critical in planning appropriate control measures against dengue fever. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of dengue fever in India METHODS: We searched for studies published until 2017 reporting the incidence, the prevalence or case fatality of dengue in India. Our primary outcomes were (a) prevalence of laboratory confirmed dengue infection among clinically suspected patients, (b) seroprevalence in the general population and (c) case fatality ratio among laboratory confirmed dengue patients. We used binomial–normal mixed effects regression model to estimate the pooled proportion of dengue infections. Forest plots were used to display pooled estimates. The metafor package of R software was used to conduct meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of the 2285 identified articles on dengue, we included 233 in the analysis wherein 180 reported prevalence of laboratory confirmed dengue infection, seven reported seroprevalence as evidenced by IgG or neutralizing antibodies against dengue and 77 reported case fatality. The overall estimate of the prevalence of laboratory confirmed dengue infection among clinically suspected patients was 38.3% (95% CI: 34.8%–41.8%). The pooled estimate of dengue seroprevalence in the general population and CFR among laboratory confirmed patients was 56.9% (95% CI: 37.5–74.4) and 2.6% (95% CI: 2–3.4) respectively. There was significant heterogeneity in reported outcomes (p-values<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Identified gaps in the understanding of dengue epidemiology in India emphasize the need to initiate community-based cohort studies representing different geographic regions to generate reliable estimates of age-specific incidence of dengue and studies to generate dengue seroprevalence data in the country. Public Library of Science 2018-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6078327/ /pubmed/30011275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006618 Text en © 2018 Ganeshkumar et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ganeshkumar, Parasuraman Murhekar, Manoj V. Poornima, Veeraraghavadoss Saravanakumar, Velusamy Sukumaran, Krishnendu Anandaselvasankar, Anandan John, Denny Mehendale, Sanjay M. Dengue infection in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Dengue infection in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Dengue infection in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Dengue infection in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Dengue infection in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Dengue infection in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | dengue infection in india: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6078327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30011275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006618 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ganeshkumarparasuraman dengueinfectioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT murhekarmanojv dengueinfectioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT poornimaveeraraghavadoss dengueinfectioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT saravanakumarvelusamy dengueinfectioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sukumarankrishnendu dengueinfectioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT anandaselvasankaranandan dengueinfectioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT johndenny dengueinfectioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mehendalesanjaym dengueinfectioninindiaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |