Cargando…

Reading the mind in the touch: Neurophysiological specificity in the communication of emotions by touch

Touch is central to interpersonal interactions. Touch conveys specific emotions about the touch provider, but it is not clear whether this is a purely socially learned function or whether it has neurophysiological specificity. In two experiments with healthy participants (N = 76 and 61) and one neur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirsch, Louise P., Krahé, Charlotte, Blom, Nadia, Crucianelli, Laura, Moro, Valentina, Jenkinson, Paul M., Fotopoulou, Aikaterini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pergamon Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6078710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28572007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.024
_version_ 1783345135397896192
author Kirsch, Louise P.
Krahé, Charlotte
Blom, Nadia
Crucianelli, Laura
Moro, Valentina
Jenkinson, Paul M.
Fotopoulou, Aikaterini
author_facet Kirsch, Louise P.
Krahé, Charlotte
Blom, Nadia
Crucianelli, Laura
Moro, Valentina
Jenkinson, Paul M.
Fotopoulou, Aikaterini
author_sort Kirsch, Louise P.
collection PubMed
description Touch is central to interpersonal interactions. Touch conveys specific emotions about the touch provider, but it is not clear whether this is a purely socially learned function or whether it has neurophysiological specificity. In two experiments with healthy participants (N = 76 and 61) and one neuropsychological single case study, we investigated whether a type of touch characterised by peripheral and central neurophysiological specificity, namely the C tactile (CT) system, can communicate specific emotions and mental states. We examined the specificity of emotions elicited by touch delivered at CT-optimal (3 cm/s) and CT-suboptimal (18 cm/s) velocities (Experiment 1) at different body sites which contain (forearm) vs. do not contain (palm of the hand) CT fibres (Experiment 2). Blindfolded participants were touched without any contextual cues, and were asked to identify the touch provider's emotion and intention. Overall, CT-optimal touch (slow, gentle touch on the forearm) was significantly more likely than other types of touch to convey arousal, lust or desire. Affiliative emotions such as love and related intentions such as social support were instead reliably elicited by gentle touch, irrespective of CT-optimality, suggesting that other top-down factors contribute to these aspects of tactile social communication. To explore the neural basis of this communication, we also tested this paradigm in a stroke patient with right perisylvian damage, including the posterior insular cortex, which is considered as the primary cortical target of CT afferents, but excluding temporal cortex involvement that has been linked to more affiliative aspects of CT-optimal touch. His performance suggested an impairment in ‘reading’ emotions based on CT-optimal touch. Taken together, our results suggest that the CT system can add specificity to emotional and social communication, particularly with regards to feelings of desire and arousal. On the basis of these findings, we speculate that its primary functional role may be to enhance the ‘sensual salience’ of tactile interactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6078710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Pergamon Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60787102018-08-10 Reading the mind in the touch: Neurophysiological specificity in the communication of emotions by touch Kirsch, Louise P. Krahé, Charlotte Blom, Nadia Crucianelli, Laura Moro, Valentina Jenkinson, Paul M. Fotopoulou, Aikaterini Neuropsychologia Article Touch is central to interpersonal interactions. Touch conveys specific emotions about the touch provider, but it is not clear whether this is a purely socially learned function or whether it has neurophysiological specificity. In two experiments with healthy participants (N = 76 and 61) and one neuropsychological single case study, we investigated whether a type of touch characterised by peripheral and central neurophysiological specificity, namely the C tactile (CT) system, can communicate specific emotions and mental states. We examined the specificity of emotions elicited by touch delivered at CT-optimal (3 cm/s) and CT-suboptimal (18 cm/s) velocities (Experiment 1) at different body sites which contain (forearm) vs. do not contain (palm of the hand) CT fibres (Experiment 2). Blindfolded participants were touched without any contextual cues, and were asked to identify the touch provider's emotion and intention. Overall, CT-optimal touch (slow, gentle touch on the forearm) was significantly more likely than other types of touch to convey arousal, lust or desire. Affiliative emotions such as love and related intentions such as social support were instead reliably elicited by gentle touch, irrespective of CT-optimality, suggesting that other top-down factors contribute to these aspects of tactile social communication. To explore the neural basis of this communication, we also tested this paradigm in a stroke patient with right perisylvian damage, including the posterior insular cortex, which is considered as the primary cortical target of CT afferents, but excluding temporal cortex involvement that has been linked to more affiliative aspects of CT-optimal touch. His performance suggested an impairment in ‘reading’ emotions based on CT-optimal touch. Taken together, our results suggest that the CT system can add specificity to emotional and social communication, particularly with regards to feelings of desire and arousal. On the basis of these findings, we speculate that its primary functional role may be to enhance the ‘sensual salience’ of tactile interactions. Pergamon Press 2018-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6078710/ /pubmed/28572007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.024 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kirsch, Louise P.
Krahé, Charlotte
Blom, Nadia
Crucianelli, Laura
Moro, Valentina
Jenkinson, Paul M.
Fotopoulou, Aikaterini
Reading the mind in the touch: Neurophysiological specificity in the communication of emotions by touch
title Reading the mind in the touch: Neurophysiological specificity in the communication of emotions by touch
title_full Reading the mind in the touch: Neurophysiological specificity in the communication of emotions by touch
title_fullStr Reading the mind in the touch: Neurophysiological specificity in the communication of emotions by touch
title_full_unstemmed Reading the mind in the touch: Neurophysiological specificity in the communication of emotions by touch
title_short Reading the mind in the touch: Neurophysiological specificity in the communication of emotions by touch
title_sort reading the mind in the touch: neurophysiological specificity in the communication of emotions by touch
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6078710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28572007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.024
work_keys_str_mv AT kirschlouisep readingthemindinthetouchneurophysiologicalspecificityinthecommunicationofemotionsbytouch
AT krahecharlotte readingthemindinthetouchneurophysiologicalspecificityinthecommunicationofemotionsbytouch
AT blomnadia readingthemindinthetouchneurophysiologicalspecificityinthecommunicationofemotionsbytouch
AT crucianellilaura readingthemindinthetouchneurophysiologicalspecificityinthecommunicationofemotionsbytouch
AT morovalentina readingthemindinthetouchneurophysiologicalspecificityinthecommunicationofemotionsbytouch
AT jenkinsonpaulm readingthemindinthetouchneurophysiologicalspecificityinthecommunicationofemotionsbytouch
AT fotopoulouaikaterini readingthemindinthetouchneurophysiologicalspecificityinthecommunicationofemotionsbytouch