Cargando…

Treatment outcomes of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a comparison of Ir-192 versus Co-60 sources

OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare treatment outcomes between cobalt-60 (Co-60) and iridium-192 (Ir-192) high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy in stage IB2–IIIB cervical cancer patients at Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindrahiraj University. METHODS: A retrospectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tantivatana, Thanatip, Rongsriyam, Kanisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6078892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30049023
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e86
_version_ 1783345162535043072
author Tantivatana, Thanatip
Rongsriyam, Kanisa
author_facet Tantivatana, Thanatip
Rongsriyam, Kanisa
author_sort Tantivatana, Thanatip
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare treatment outcomes between cobalt-60 (Co-60) and iridium-192 (Ir-192) high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy in stage IB2–IIIB cervical cancer patients at Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindrahiraj University. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with cervical cancer and treated with radiotherapy at the Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital between 2004 and 2014. Survival rate was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and were compared between groups with log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 480 patients with cervical cancer and treated with radiotherapy were included, 274 patients for Ir-192 group and 206 patients for Co-60 group. The 2- and 5-year disease-free survival rate in Ir-192 group were 80.4% and 73.1% and in Co-60 group were 82.5% and 74.7%, respectively (p=0.365). Overall survival rates at 2 and 5 years were 89.4% and 77% of the Ir-192 group, and 91.6% and 81.9% in the Co-60 group, respectively (p=0.238). The complications were primarily grade 1 or 2. Grade 3 and 4 complications were found in 13 of 274 and 7 of 206 in Ir-192 and Co-60 groups, respectively (p=0.232). Grade and clinical stage of cancer significantly affected the survival outcome. CONCLUSION: Cervical cancer patients who were treated with HDR Co-60 brachytherapy were comparable in survival and toxicity outcomes of those with HDR Ir-192 brachytherapy. Co-60 source has lots of economic advantages over Ir-192 and hence suitable for low resource radiotherapy setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6078892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60788922018-09-01 Treatment outcomes of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a comparison of Ir-192 versus Co-60 sources Tantivatana, Thanatip Rongsriyam, Kanisa J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare treatment outcomes between cobalt-60 (Co-60) and iridium-192 (Ir-192) high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy in stage IB2–IIIB cervical cancer patients at Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindrahiraj University. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with cervical cancer and treated with radiotherapy at the Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital between 2004 and 2014. Survival rate was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and were compared between groups with log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 480 patients with cervical cancer and treated with radiotherapy were included, 274 patients for Ir-192 group and 206 patients for Co-60 group. The 2- and 5-year disease-free survival rate in Ir-192 group were 80.4% and 73.1% and in Co-60 group were 82.5% and 74.7%, respectively (p=0.365). Overall survival rates at 2 and 5 years were 89.4% and 77% of the Ir-192 group, and 91.6% and 81.9% in the Co-60 group, respectively (p=0.238). The complications were primarily grade 1 or 2. Grade 3 and 4 complications were found in 13 of 274 and 7 of 206 in Ir-192 and Co-60 groups, respectively (p=0.232). Grade and clinical stage of cancer significantly affected the survival outcome. CONCLUSION: Cervical cancer patients who were treated with HDR Co-60 brachytherapy were comparable in survival and toxicity outcomes of those with HDR Ir-192 brachytherapy. Co-60 source has lots of economic advantages over Ir-192 and hence suitable for low resource radiotherapy setting. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2018-09 2018-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6078892/ /pubmed/30049023 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e86 Text en Copyright © 2018. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tantivatana, Thanatip
Rongsriyam, Kanisa
Treatment outcomes of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a comparison of Ir-192 versus Co-60 sources
title Treatment outcomes of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a comparison of Ir-192 versus Co-60 sources
title_full Treatment outcomes of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a comparison of Ir-192 versus Co-60 sources
title_fullStr Treatment outcomes of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a comparison of Ir-192 versus Co-60 sources
title_full_unstemmed Treatment outcomes of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a comparison of Ir-192 versus Co-60 sources
title_short Treatment outcomes of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a comparison of Ir-192 versus Co-60 sources
title_sort treatment outcomes of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a comparison of ir-192 versus co-60 sources
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6078892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30049023
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e86
work_keys_str_mv AT tantivatanathanatip treatmentoutcomesofhighdoserateintracavitarybrachytherapyforcervicalcanceracomparisonofir192versusco60sources
AT rongsriyamkanisa treatmentoutcomesofhighdoserateintracavitarybrachytherapyforcervicalcanceracomparisonofir192versusco60sources