Cargando…

Repeated Bout Rate Enhancement Is Elicited by Various Forms of Finger Tapping

Voluntary rhythmic movements, such as, for example, locomotion and other cyclic tasks, are fundamental during everyday life. Patients with impaired neural or motor function often take part in rehabilitation programs, which include rhythmic movements. Therefore, it is imperative to have the best poss...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emanuelsen, Anders, Voigt, Michael, Madeleine, Pascal, Kjær, Pia, Dam, Sebastian, Koefoed, Nikolaj, Hansen, Ernst A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6079229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30108479
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00526
_version_ 1783345228023857152
author Emanuelsen, Anders
Voigt, Michael
Madeleine, Pascal
Kjær, Pia
Dam, Sebastian
Koefoed, Nikolaj
Hansen, Ernst A.
author_facet Emanuelsen, Anders
Voigt, Michael
Madeleine, Pascal
Kjær, Pia
Dam, Sebastian
Koefoed, Nikolaj
Hansen, Ernst A.
author_sort Emanuelsen, Anders
collection PubMed
description Voluntary rhythmic movements, such as, for example, locomotion and other cyclic tasks, are fundamental during everyday life. Patients with impaired neural or motor function often take part in rehabilitation programs, which include rhythmic movements. Therefore, it is imperative to have the best possible understanding of control and behaviour of human voluntary rhythmic movements. A behavioural phenomenon termed repeated bout rate enhancement has been established as an increase of the freely chosen index finger tapping frequency during the second of two consecutive tapping bouts. The present study investigated whether the phenomenon would be elicited when the first bout consisted of imposed passive finger tapping or air tapping. These two forms of tapping were applied since they can be performed without descending drive (passive tapping) and without afferent feedback related to impact (air tapping) – as compared to tapping on a surface. Healthy individuals (n = 33) performed 3-min tapping bouts separated by 10 min rest. Surface electromyographic, kinetic, and kinematic data were recorded. Supportive experiments were made to measure, for example, the cortical sensory evoked potential (SEP) response during the three different forms of tapping. Results showed that tapping frequencies in the second of two consecutive bouts increased by 12.9 ± 14.8% (p < 0.001), 9.9 ± 6.0% (p = 0.001), and 16.8 ± 13.6% (p = 0.005) when the first bout had consisted of tapping, passive tapping, and air tapping, respectively. Rate enhancement occurred without increase in muscle activation. Besides, the rate enhancements occurred despite that tapping, as compared with passive tapping and air tapping, resulted in different cortical SEP responses. Based on the present findings, it can be suggested that sensory feedback in an initial bout increases the excitability of the spinal central pattern generators involved in finger tapping. This can eventually explain the phenomenon of repeated bout rate enhancement seen after a consecutive bout of finger tapping.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6079229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60792292018-08-14 Repeated Bout Rate Enhancement Is Elicited by Various Forms of Finger Tapping Emanuelsen, Anders Voigt, Michael Madeleine, Pascal Kjær, Pia Dam, Sebastian Koefoed, Nikolaj Hansen, Ernst A. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Voluntary rhythmic movements, such as, for example, locomotion and other cyclic tasks, are fundamental during everyday life. Patients with impaired neural or motor function often take part in rehabilitation programs, which include rhythmic movements. Therefore, it is imperative to have the best possible understanding of control and behaviour of human voluntary rhythmic movements. A behavioural phenomenon termed repeated bout rate enhancement has been established as an increase of the freely chosen index finger tapping frequency during the second of two consecutive tapping bouts. The present study investigated whether the phenomenon would be elicited when the first bout consisted of imposed passive finger tapping or air tapping. These two forms of tapping were applied since they can be performed without descending drive (passive tapping) and without afferent feedback related to impact (air tapping) – as compared to tapping on a surface. Healthy individuals (n = 33) performed 3-min tapping bouts separated by 10 min rest. Surface electromyographic, kinetic, and kinematic data were recorded. Supportive experiments were made to measure, for example, the cortical sensory evoked potential (SEP) response during the three different forms of tapping. Results showed that tapping frequencies in the second of two consecutive bouts increased by 12.9 ± 14.8% (p < 0.001), 9.9 ± 6.0% (p = 0.001), and 16.8 ± 13.6% (p = 0.005) when the first bout had consisted of tapping, passive tapping, and air tapping, respectively. Rate enhancement occurred without increase in muscle activation. Besides, the rate enhancements occurred despite that tapping, as compared with passive tapping and air tapping, resulted in different cortical SEP responses. Based on the present findings, it can be suggested that sensory feedback in an initial bout increases the excitability of the spinal central pattern generators involved in finger tapping. This can eventually explain the phenomenon of repeated bout rate enhancement seen after a consecutive bout of finger tapping. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6079229/ /pubmed/30108479 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00526 Text en Copyright © 2018 Emanuelsen, Voigt, Madeleine, Kjær, Dam, Koefoed and Hansen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Emanuelsen, Anders
Voigt, Michael
Madeleine, Pascal
Kjær, Pia
Dam, Sebastian
Koefoed, Nikolaj
Hansen, Ernst A.
Repeated Bout Rate Enhancement Is Elicited by Various Forms of Finger Tapping
title Repeated Bout Rate Enhancement Is Elicited by Various Forms of Finger Tapping
title_full Repeated Bout Rate Enhancement Is Elicited by Various Forms of Finger Tapping
title_fullStr Repeated Bout Rate Enhancement Is Elicited by Various Forms of Finger Tapping
title_full_unstemmed Repeated Bout Rate Enhancement Is Elicited by Various Forms of Finger Tapping
title_short Repeated Bout Rate Enhancement Is Elicited by Various Forms of Finger Tapping
title_sort repeated bout rate enhancement is elicited by various forms of finger tapping
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6079229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30108479
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00526
work_keys_str_mv AT emanuelsenanders repeatedboutrateenhancementiselicitedbyvariousformsoffingertapping
AT voigtmichael repeatedboutrateenhancementiselicitedbyvariousformsoffingertapping
AT madeleinepascal repeatedboutrateenhancementiselicitedbyvariousformsoffingertapping
AT kjærpia repeatedboutrateenhancementiselicitedbyvariousformsoffingertapping
AT damsebastian repeatedboutrateenhancementiselicitedbyvariousformsoffingertapping
AT koefoednikolaj repeatedboutrateenhancementiselicitedbyvariousformsoffingertapping
AT hansenernsta repeatedboutrateenhancementiselicitedbyvariousformsoffingertapping