Cargando…

Numerical Low-Back Booster Analysis on a 6-Year-Old Infant during a Frontal Crash Test

This work studies descriptively the Head Injury Criterion (HIC) and Chest Severity Index (CSI), with a finite element model of the Hybrid III dummy type, for six-year-old subjects in a frontal vehicular collision, using the low-back booster (LBB) passive safety system. The vehicle seats and the pass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cruz-Jaramillo, I. L., Torres-San-Miguel, C. R., Cortes-Vásquez, O., Martínez-Sáez, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6079572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30116294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2359262
_version_ 1783345304459804672
author Cruz-Jaramillo, I. L.
Torres-San-Miguel, C. R.
Cortes-Vásquez, O.
Martínez-Sáez, L.
author_facet Cruz-Jaramillo, I. L.
Torres-San-Miguel, C. R.
Cortes-Vásquez, O.
Martínez-Sáez, L.
author_sort Cruz-Jaramillo, I. L.
collection PubMed
description This work studies descriptively the Head Injury Criterion (HIC) and Chest Severity Index (CSI), with a finite element model of the Hybrid III dummy type, for six-year-old subjects in a frontal vehicular collision, using the low-back booster (LBB) passive safety system. The vehicle seats and the passive safety systems were modelled in CAD (computer aided design) software. Then, the elements were analysed by the finite element method (FEM) in LS-DYNA® software. The boundary conditions were established for each study, according to the regulations established by the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS), following the FMVSS 213 standard. The numerical simulations were performed during an interval of 120 ms and recording results every 1 ms. In order to analyse the efficiency of the system, the restraint performance of the LBB system is compared with the restraint configuration of the vehicle safety belt (VSB) only. The obtained injury criteria with the LBB system shows its ability to protect children in a frontal collision. The analyses allow obtaining the deceleration values to which the dummy head and chest was subjected. Of the studies herein performed, Study I: VSB obtained a HIC(36) of 730.4 and CSI of 315.5, while Study II: LBB obtained a HIC(36) of 554.3 and CSI of 281.9. The outcome shows that the restraint efficiency of each studied case differs. Used materials, the attachment system of the LBB, and the belt restraint system properly placed over the infant trunk are the main factors reducing the injury criteria rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6079572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60795722018-08-16 Numerical Low-Back Booster Analysis on a 6-Year-Old Infant during a Frontal Crash Test Cruz-Jaramillo, I. L. Torres-San-Miguel, C. R. Cortes-Vásquez, O. Martínez-Sáez, L. Appl Bionics Biomech Research Article This work studies descriptively the Head Injury Criterion (HIC) and Chest Severity Index (CSI), with a finite element model of the Hybrid III dummy type, for six-year-old subjects in a frontal vehicular collision, using the low-back booster (LBB) passive safety system. The vehicle seats and the passive safety systems were modelled in CAD (computer aided design) software. Then, the elements were analysed by the finite element method (FEM) in LS-DYNA® software. The boundary conditions were established for each study, according to the regulations established by the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS), following the FMVSS 213 standard. The numerical simulations were performed during an interval of 120 ms and recording results every 1 ms. In order to analyse the efficiency of the system, the restraint performance of the LBB system is compared with the restraint configuration of the vehicle safety belt (VSB) only. The obtained injury criteria with the LBB system shows its ability to protect children in a frontal collision. The analyses allow obtaining the deceleration values to which the dummy head and chest was subjected. Of the studies herein performed, Study I: VSB obtained a HIC(36) of 730.4 and CSI of 315.5, while Study II: LBB obtained a HIC(36) of 554.3 and CSI of 281.9. The outcome shows that the restraint efficiency of each studied case differs. Used materials, the attachment system of the LBB, and the belt restraint system properly placed over the infant trunk are the main factors reducing the injury criteria rate. Hindawi 2018-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6079572/ /pubmed/30116294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2359262 Text en Copyright © 2018 I. L. Cruz-Jaramillo et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cruz-Jaramillo, I. L.
Torres-San-Miguel, C. R.
Cortes-Vásquez, O.
Martínez-Sáez, L.
Numerical Low-Back Booster Analysis on a 6-Year-Old Infant during a Frontal Crash Test
title Numerical Low-Back Booster Analysis on a 6-Year-Old Infant during a Frontal Crash Test
title_full Numerical Low-Back Booster Analysis on a 6-Year-Old Infant during a Frontal Crash Test
title_fullStr Numerical Low-Back Booster Analysis on a 6-Year-Old Infant during a Frontal Crash Test
title_full_unstemmed Numerical Low-Back Booster Analysis on a 6-Year-Old Infant during a Frontal Crash Test
title_short Numerical Low-Back Booster Analysis on a 6-Year-Old Infant during a Frontal Crash Test
title_sort numerical low-back booster analysis on a 6-year-old infant during a frontal crash test
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6079572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30116294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2359262
work_keys_str_mv AT cruzjaramilloil numericallowbackboosteranalysisona6yearoldinfantduringafrontalcrashtest
AT torressanmiguelcr numericallowbackboosteranalysisona6yearoldinfantduringafrontalcrashtest
AT cortesvasquezo numericallowbackboosteranalysisona6yearoldinfantduringafrontalcrashtest
AT martinezsaezl numericallowbackboosteranalysisona6yearoldinfantduringafrontalcrashtest