Cargando…

Comparison of palatal rugae pattern among Indian and Tibetan population

INTRODUCTION: Palatoscopy is the study of palatal rugae pattern to establish the identity of a person. The palatal rugae are permanent and unique to each person and can establish identity through discrimination (via casts, tracings, or digitized rugae patterns). In addition, rugae pattern may be spe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hosmani, Jagadish, Gadekar, Nikita Bhujang, Kotrashetti, Vijayalakshmi S., Nayak, Ramakant, Babji, Deepa, Mishra, Sudhir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6080164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30122868
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_18_16
_version_ 1783345423579086848
author Hosmani, Jagadish
Gadekar, Nikita Bhujang
Kotrashetti, Vijayalakshmi S.
Nayak, Ramakant
Babji, Deepa
Mishra, Sudhir
author_facet Hosmani, Jagadish
Gadekar, Nikita Bhujang
Kotrashetti, Vijayalakshmi S.
Nayak, Ramakant
Babji, Deepa
Mishra, Sudhir
author_sort Hosmani, Jagadish
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Palatoscopy is the study of palatal rugae pattern to establish the identity of a person. The palatal rugae are permanent and unique to each person and can establish identity through discrimination (via casts, tracings, or digitized rugae patterns). In addition, rugae pattern may be specific to racial groups facilitating population identification (which may require postdisasters). Hence, they can be used in postmortem identification provided an antemortem record exists. AIM: To determine the palatal rugae pattern and to assess the predominant palatal rugae pattern in Indian and Tibetan (in Mundgod Taluka, Karnataka) populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The impressions of the maxillary arch were made for a total of one hundred adults comprising fifty Indian and fifty Tibetan populations aged between 20 and 40 years, and the dental cast was made using dental stone. The rugae were highlighted by a sharp graphite pencil on the cast under adequate light and a magnification lens. Rugae patterns were assessed using Thomas and Kotze and Kapali et al. classification. RESULTS: Total number of palatal rugae in Indian population (461) was more than Tibetan population (351). Moreover, Indian population showed predominantly wavy (43.60%) rugae pattern, whereas Tibetan showed curved (38.2%) rugae pattern. CONCLUSION: This suggests that there is a difference in the rugae pattern between Indian and Tibetan populations. Hence, palatal rugae pattern can be used as one of the methods in determining the ethnicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6080164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60801642018-08-17 Comparison of palatal rugae pattern among Indian and Tibetan population Hosmani, Jagadish Gadekar, Nikita Bhujang Kotrashetti, Vijayalakshmi S. Nayak, Ramakant Babji, Deepa Mishra, Sudhir J Forensic Dent Sci Original Article INTRODUCTION: Palatoscopy is the study of palatal rugae pattern to establish the identity of a person. The palatal rugae are permanent and unique to each person and can establish identity through discrimination (via casts, tracings, or digitized rugae patterns). In addition, rugae pattern may be specific to racial groups facilitating population identification (which may require postdisasters). Hence, they can be used in postmortem identification provided an antemortem record exists. AIM: To determine the palatal rugae pattern and to assess the predominant palatal rugae pattern in Indian and Tibetan (in Mundgod Taluka, Karnataka) populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The impressions of the maxillary arch were made for a total of one hundred adults comprising fifty Indian and fifty Tibetan populations aged between 20 and 40 years, and the dental cast was made using dental stone. The rugae were highlighted by a sharp graphite pencil on the cast under adequate light and a magnification lens. Rugae patterns were assessed using Thomas and Kotze and Kapali et al. classification. RESULTS: Total number of palatal rugae in Indian population (461) was more than Tibetan population (351). Moreover, Indian population showed predominantly wavy (43.60%) rugae pattern, whereas Tibetan showed curved (38.2%) rugae pattern. CONCLUSION: This suggests that there is a difference in the rugae pattern between Indian and Tibetan populations. Hence, palatal rugae pattern can be used as one of the methods in determining the ethnicity. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6080164/ /pubmed/30122868 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_18_16 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hosmani, Jagadish
Gadekar, Nikita Bhujang
Kotrashetti, Vijayalakshmi S.
Nayak, Ramakant
Babji, Deepa
Mishra, Sudhir
Comparison of palatal rugae pattern among Indian and Tibetan population
title Comparison of palatal rugae pattern among Indian and Tibetan population
title_full Comparison of palatal rugae pattern among Indian and Tibetan population
title_fullStr Comparison of palatal rugae pattern among Indian and Tibetan population
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of palatal rugae pattern among Indian and Tibetan population
title_short Comparison of palatal rugae pattern among Indian and Tibetan population
title_sort comparison of palatal rugae pattern among indian and tibetan population
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6080164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30122868
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_18_16
work_keys_str_mv AT hosmanijagadish comparisonofpalatalrugaepatternamongindianandtibetanpopulation
AT gadekarnikitabhujang comparisonofpalatalrugaepatternamongindianandtibetanpopulation
AT kotrashettivijayalakshmis comparisonofpalatalrugaepatternamongindianandtibetanpopulation
AT nayakramakant comparisonofpalatalrugaepatternamongindianandtibetanpopulation
AT babjideepa comparisonofpalatalrugaepatternamongindianandtibetanpopulation
AT mishrasudhir comparisonofpalatalrugaepatternamongindianandtibetanpopulation