Cargando…

Comparative analysis of smear layer removal by conventional endodontic irrigants with a newly experimented irrigant-fumaric acid: A scanning electron microscopic study

INTRODUCTION: This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA), 7% maleic acid and 0.7% fumaric acid in smear layer removal from the root canal walls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty single-rooted mandibular premolars were collected and prepared till F3 rotary Pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaiswal, Sanjay, Patil, Veerendra, Satish Kumar, K. S., Ratnakar, P., Rairam, Surabhi, Tripathi, Supratim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6080187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30122824
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_290_16
_version_ 1783345428990787584
author Jaiswal, Sanjay
Patil, Veerendra
Satish Kumar, K. S.
Ratnakar, P.
Rairam, Surabhi
Tripathi, Supratim
author_facet Jaiswal, Sanjay
Patil, Veerendra
Satish Kumar, K. S.
Ratnakar, P.
Rairam, Surabhi
Tripathi, Supratim
author_sort Jaiswal, Sanjay
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA), 7% maleic acid and 0.7% fumaric acid in smear layer removal from the root canal walls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty single-rooted mandibular premolars were collected and prepared till F3 rotary ProTaper file with 1 ml of 3% of sodium hypochlorite after each instrument change. Samples were randomly divided into 4 groups according to the final irrigating solution: 17% EDTA, 7% maleic acid, 0.7% fumaric acid, and 0.9% saline. The samples were prepared for scanning electron microscope analysis to observe smear layer removal at coronal, middle, and apical third level of root canal system. RESULTS: At coronal third level, fumaric acid was equally efficient in smear layer removal when compared to maleic acid and EDTA without any significant difference between them. At the middle third, fumaric acid showed significantly better results than maleic acid followed by EDTA. At the apical third, both fumaric acid and maleic acid were equally effective without any significant difference between them but both showed significantly better results than EDTA. CONCLUSION: Fumaric acid can be tried as a new irrigating agent for smear layer removal in root canal system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6080187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60801872018-08-17 Comparative analysis of smear layer removal by conventional endodontic irrigants with a newly experimented irrigant-fumaric acid: A scanning electron microscopic study Jaiswal, Sanjay Patil, Veerendra Satish Kumar, K. S. Ratnakar, P. Rairam, Surabhi Tripathi, Supratim J Conserv Dent Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA), 7% maleic acid and 0.7% fumaric acid in smear layer removal from the root canal walls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty single-rooted mandibular premolars were collected and prepared till F3 rotary ProTaper file with 1 ml of 3% of sodium hypochlorite after each instrument change. Samples were randomly divided into 4 groups according to the final irrigating solution: 17% EDTA, 7% maleic acid, 0.7% fumaric acid, and 0.9% saline. The samples were prepared for scanning electron microscope analysis to observe smear layer removal at coronal, middle, and apical third level of root canal system. RESULTS: At coronal third level, fumaric acid was equally efficient in smear layer removal when compared to maleic acid and EDTA without any significant difference between them. At the middle third, fumaric acid showed significantly better results than maleic acid followed by EDTA. At the apical third, both fumaric acid and maleic acid were equally effective without any significant difference between them but both showed significantly better results than EDTA. CONCLUSION: Fumaric acid can be tried as a new irrigating agent for smear layer removal in root canal system. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6080187/ /pubmed/30122824 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_290_16 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Jaiswal, Sanjay
Patil, Veerendra
Satish Kumar, K. S.
Ratnakar, P.
Rairam, Surabhi
Tripathi, Supratim
Comparative analysis of smear layer removal by conventional endodontic irrigants with a newly experimented irrigant-fumaric acid: A scanning electron microscopic study
title Comparative analysis of smear layer removal by conventional endodontic irrigants with a newly experimented irrigant-fumaric acid: A scanning electron microscopic study
title_full Comparative analysis of smear layer removal by conventional endodontic irrigants with a newly experimented irrigant-fumaric acid: A scanning electron microscopic study
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of smear layer removal by conventional endodontic irrigants with a newly experimented irrigant-fumaric acid: A scanning electron microscopic study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of smear layer removal by conventional endodontic irrigants with a newly experimented irrigant-fumaric acid: A scanning electron microscopic study
title_short Comparative analysis of smear layer removal by conventional endodontic irrigants with a newly experimented irrigant-fumaric acid: A scanning electron microscopic study
title_sort comparative analysis of smear layer removal by conventional endodontic irrigants with a newly experimented irrigant-fumaric acid: a scanning electron microscopic study
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6080187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30122824
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_290_16
work_keys_str_mv AT jaiswalsanjay comparativeanalysisofsmearlayerremovalbyconventionalendodonticirrigantswithanewlyexperimentedirrigantfumaricacidascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy
AT patilveerendra comparativeanalysisofsmearlayerremovalbyconventionalendodonticirrigantswithanewlyexperimentedirrigantfumaricacidascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy
AT satishkumarks comparativeanalysisofsmearlayerremovalbyconventionalendodonticirrigantswithanewlyexperimentedirrigantfumaricacidascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy
AT ratnakarp comparativeanalysisofsmearlayerremovalbyconventionalendodonticirrigantswithanewlyexperimentedirrigantfumaricacidascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy
AT rairamsurabhi comparativeanalysisofsmearlayerremovalbyconventionalendodonticirrigantswithanewlyexperimentedirrigantfumaricacidascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy
AT tripathisupratim comparativeanalysisofsmearlayerremovalbyconventionalendodonticirrigantswithanewlyexperimentedirrigantfumaricacidascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy