Cargando…

Post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected prion disease: Pathological confirmation, sensitivity, specificity and observer reliability. A national registry

The relationship between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical variables in patients suspected to have Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) is uncertain. We aimed to determine which MRI features of CJD (positive or negative), previously described in vivo, accurately identify CJD, are most reliabl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gibson, Lorna M., Chappell, Francesca M., Summers, David, Collie, Donald A., Sellar, Robin, Best, Jonathan, Knight, Richard, Ironside, James W., Wardlaw, Joanna M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6080765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30086144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201434
_version_ 1783345535503040512
author Gibson, Lorna M.
Chappell, Francesca M.
Summers, David
Collie, Donald A.
Sellar, Robin
Best, Jonathan
Knight, Richard
Ironside, James W.
Wardlaw, Joanna M.
author_facet Gibson, Lorna M.
Chappell, Francesca M.
Summers, David
Collie, Donald A.
Sellar, Robin
Best, Jonathan
Knight, Richard
Ironside, James W.
Wardlaw, Joanna M.
author_sort Gibson, Lorna M.
collection PubMed
description The relationship between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical variables in patients suspected to have Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) is uncertain. We aimed to determine which MRI features of CJD (positive or negative), previously described in vivo, accurately identify CJD, are most reliably detected, vary with disease duration, and whether combined clinical and imaging features increase diagnostic accuracy for CJD. Prospective patients suspected of having CJD were referred to the National CJD Research and Surveillance Unit between 1994–2004; post-mortem, brains were sent for MRI and histopathology. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed MRI for atrophy, white matter hyperintensities, and caudate, lentiform and pulvinar signals, blind to histopathological diagnosis and clinical details. We examined differences in variable frequencies using Fisher’s exact tests, and associations between variables and CJD in logistic regression models. Amongst 200 cases, 118 (59%) with a histopathological diagnosis of CJD and 82 (41%) with histopathological diagnoses other than CJD, a logistic regression model including age, disease duration at death, atrophy, white matter hyperintensities, bright or possibly bright caudate, and present pulvinar sign correctly classified 81% of cases as CJD versus not CJD. Pulvinar sign alone was not independently associated with an increased likelihood of histopathologically-confirmed CJD (of any subtype) or sporadic CJD after adjustment for age at death, disease duration, atrophy, white matter hyperintensities or caudate signal; despite the large sample, data sparsity precluded investigation of the association of pulvinar sign with variant CJD. No imaging feature varied significantly with disease duration. Of the positive CJD signs, neuroradiologists most frequently agreed on the presence or absence of atrophy (agreements in 169/200 cases [84.5%]). Combining patient age, and disease duration, with absence of atrophy and white matter hyperintensities and presence of increased caudate signal and pulvinar sign predicts CJD with good accuracy. Autopsy remains essential.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6080765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60807652018-08-16 Post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected prion disease: Pathological confirmation, sensitivity, specificity and observer reliability. A national registry Gibson, Lorna M. Chappell, Francesca M. Summers, David Collie, Donald A. Sellar, Robin Best, Jonathan Knight, Richard Ironside, James W. Wardlaw, Joanna M. PLoS One Research Article The relationship between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical variables in patients suspected to have Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) is uncertain. We aimed to determine which MRI features of CJD (positive or negative), previously described in vivo, accurately identify CJD, are most reliably detected, vary with disease duration, and whether combined clinical and imaging features increase diagnostic accuracy for CJD. Prospective patients suspected of having CJD were referred to the National CJD Research and Surveillance Unit between 1994–2004; post-mortem, brains were sent for MRI and histopathology. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed MRI for atrophy, white matter hyperintensities, and caudate, lentiform and pulvinar signals, blind to histopathological diagnosis and clinical details. We examined differences in variable frequencies using Fisher’s exact tests, and associations between variables and CJD in logistic regression models. Amongst 200 cases, 118 (59%) with a histopathological diagnosis of CJD and 82 (41%) with histopathological diagnoses other than CJD, a logistic regression model including age, disease duration at death, atrophy, white matter hyperintensities, bright or possibly bright caudate, and present pulvinar sign correctly classified 81% of cases as CJD versus not CJD. Pulvinar sign alone was not independently associated with an increased likelihood of histopathologically-confirmed CJD (of any subtype) or sporadic CJD after adjustment for age at death, disease duration, atrophy, white matter hyperintensities or caudate signal; despite the large sample, data sparsity precluded investigation of the association of pulvinar sign with variant CJD. No imaging feature varied significantly with disease duration. Of the positive CJD signs, neuroradiologists most frequently agreed on the presence or absence of atrophy (agreements in 169/200 cases [84.5%]). Combining patient age, and disease duration, with absence of atrophy and white matter hyperintensities and presence of increased caudate signal and pulvinar sign predicts CJD with good accuracy. Autopsy remains essential. Public Library of Science 2018-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6080765/ /pubmed/30086144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201434 Text en © 2018 Gibson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gibson, Lorna M.
Chappell, Francesca M.
Summers, David
Collie, Donald A.
Sellar, Robin
Best, Jonathan
Knight, Richard
Ironside, James W.
Wardlaw, Joanna M.
Post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected prion disease: Pathological confirmation, sensitivity, specificity and observer reliability. A national registry
title Post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected prion disease: Pathological confirmation, sensitivity, specificity and observer reliability. A national registry
title_full Post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected prion disease: Pathological confirmation, sensitivity, specificity and observer reliability. A national registry
title_fullStr Post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected prion disease: Pathological confirmation, sensitivity, specificity and observer reliability. A national registry
title_full_unstemmed Post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected prion disease: Pathological confirmation, sensitivity, specificity and observer reliability. A national registry
title_short Post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected prion disease: Pathological confirmation, sensitivity, specificity and observer reliability. A national registry
title_sort post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected prion disease: pathological confirmation, sensitivity, specificity and observer reliability. a national registry
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6080765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30086144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201434
work_keys_str_mv AT gibsonlornam postmortemmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithsuspectedpriondiseasepathologicalconfirmationsensitivityspecificityandobserverreliabilityanationalregistry
AT chappellfrancescam postmortemmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithsuspectedpriondiseasepathologicalconfirmationsensitivityspecificityandobserverreliabilityanationalregistry
AT summersdavid postmortemmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithsuspectedpriondiseasepathologicalconfirmationsensitivityspecificityandobserverreliabilityanationalregistry
AT colliedonalda postmortemmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithsuspectedpriondiseasepathologicalconfirmationsensitivityspecificityandobserverreliabilityanationalregistry
AT sellarrobin postmortemmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithsuspectedpriondiseasepathologicalconfirmationsensitivityspecificityandobserverreliabilityanationalregistry
AT bestjonathan postmortemmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithsuspectedpriondiseasepathologicalconfirmationsensitivityspecificityandobserverreliabilityanationalregistry
AT knightrichard postmortemmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithsuspectedpriondiseasepathologicalconfirmationsensitivityspecificityandobserverreliabilityanationalregistry
AT ironsidejamesw postmortemmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithsuspectedpriondiseasepathologicalconfirmationsensitivityspecificityandobserverreliabilityanationalregistry
AT wardlawjoannam postmortemmagneticresonanceimaginginpatientswithsuspectedpriondiseasepathologicalconfirmationsensitivityspecificityandobserverreliabilityanationalregistry