Cargando…

The Current Lymphoma Classification: New Concepts and Practical Applications—Triumphs and Woes

The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of lymphomas updated in 2008 represents an international consensus for diagnosis of lymphoid neoplasms based on the recognition of distinct disease entities by applying a constellation of clinical and laboratory features. The 2008 classification has...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bakshi, Nasir, Maghfoor, Irfan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22588443
http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2012.296
_version_ 1783345588543160320
author Bakshi, Nasir
Maghfoor, Irfan
author_facet Bakshi, Nasir
Maghfoor, Irfan
author_sort Bakshi, Nasir
collection PubMed
description The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of lymphomas updated in 2008 represents an international consensus for diagnosis of lymphoid neoplasms based on the recognition of distinct disease entities by applying a constellation of clinical and laboratory features. The 2008 classification has refined and clarified the definitions of well-recognized diseases, identified new entities and variants, and incorporated emerging concepts in the understanding of lymphoid neoplasms. Rather than being a theoretical scheme this classification has used data from published literature. Recent knowledge of molecular pathways has led to identification and development of new diagnostic tools, like gene expression profiling, which could complement existing technologies. However, some questions remain unresolved, such as the extent to which specific genetic or molecular alterations define certain tumors. In general, practical considerations and economics preclude a heavily molecular and genetic approach. The significance of early or precursor lesions and the identification of certain lymphoid neoplasms is less clear at present, but understanding is evolving. The borderline categories having overlapping features with large B-cell lymphomas, as well as some of the provisional entities, are subject to debate and lack consensus in management. Lastly, the sheer number of entities may be overwhelming, especially, for the diagnosing pathologist, who do not see enough of these on a regular basis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6081048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60810482018-09-21 The Current Lymphoma Classification: New Concepts and Practical Applications—Triumphs and Woes Bakshi, Nasir Maghfoor, Irfan Ann Saudi Med Review The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of lymphomas updated in 2008 represents an international consensus for diagnosis of lymphoid neoplasms based on the recognition of distinct disease entities by applying a constellation of clinical and laboratory features. The 2008 classification has refined and clarified the definitions of well-recognized diseases, identified new entities and variants, and incorporated emerging concepts in the understanding of lymphoid neoplasms. Rather than being a theoretical scheme this classification has used data from published literature. Recent knowledge of molecular pathways has led to identification and development of new diagnostic tools, like gene expression profiling, which could complement existing technologies. However, some questions remain unresolved, such as the extent to which specific genetic or molecular alterations define certain tumors. In general, practical considerations and economics preclude a heavily molecular and genetic approach. The significance of early or precursor lesions and the identification of certain lymphoid neoplasms is less clear at present, but understanding is evolving. The borderline categories having overlapping features with large B-cell lymphomas, as well as some of the provisional entities, are subject to debate and lack consensus in management. Lastly, the sheer number of entities may be overwhelming, especially, for the diagnosing pathologist, who do not see enough of these on a regular basis. King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC6081048/ /pubmed/22588443 http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2012.296 Text en Copyright © 2012, Annals of Saudi Medicine This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Bakshi, Nasir
Maghfoor, Irfan
The Current Lymphoma Classification: New Concepts and Practical Applications—Triumphs and Woes
title The Current Lymphoma Classification: New Concepts and Practical Applications—Triumphs and Woes
title_full The Current Lymphoma Classification: New Concepts and Practical Applications—Triumphs and Woes
title_fullStr The Current Lymphoma Classification: New Concepts and Practical Applications—Triumphs and Woes
title_full_unstemmed The Current Lymphoma Classification: New Concepts and Practical Applications—Triumphs and Woes
title_short The Current Lymphoma Classification: New Concepts and Practical Applications—Triumphs and Woes
title_sort current lymphoma classification: new concepts and practical applications—triumphs and woes
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22588443
http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2012.296
work_keys_str_mv AT bakshinasir thecurrentlymphomaclassificationnewconceptsandpracticalapplicationstriumphsandwoes
AT maghfoorirfan thecurrentlymphomaclassificationnewconceptsandpracticalapplicationstriumphsandwoes
AT bakshinasir currentlymphomaclassificationnewconceptsandpracticalapplicationstriumphsandwoes
AT maghfoorirfan currentlymphomaclassificationnewconceptsandpracticalapplicationstriumphsandwoes