Cargando…

Automated fastener (Core-Knot) versus manually tied knots in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: Impact on cross-clamp time and short-term echocardiographic results

The Core-Knot device is an automatic fastener used mainly in minimally invasive heart valve surgery procedures, to facilitate knot tying. The purpose of this report is to compare ischemic time and outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacements (SAVRs) utilizing the Core-Knot device compared with man...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loberman, Dan, Mohr, Rephael, Pirundini, Paul A., Yazdchi, Farhang, Rinewalt, Daniel, Ziv-Baran, Tomer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30075552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011657
_version_ 1783345590386556928
author Loberman, Dan
Mohr, Rephael
Pirundini, Paul A.
Yazdchi, Farhang
Rinewalt, Daniel
Ziv-Baran, Tomer
author_facet Loberman, Dan
Mohr, Rephael
Pirundini, Paul A.
Yazdchi, Farhang
Rinewalt, Daniel
Ziv-Baran, Tomer
author_sort Loberman, Dan
collection PubMed
description The Core-Knot device is an automatic fastener used mainly in minimally invasive heart valve surgery procedures, to facilitate knot tying. The purpose of this report is to compare ischemic time and outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacements (SAVRs) utilizing the Core-Knot device compared with manually tied knots. Between January, 2014 and December, 2016, 119 patients underwent SAVR in Cape Cod Hospital. We compared patient's characteristics, cross-clamp time, and outcomes of 75 patients who underwent SAVR using Core-Knot to those of 44 operated using manually tied knots. Patient characteristics were similar between groups. Patients in the Core-Knot group had higher preoperative aortic valve area and higher ejection fraction. The use of Core-Knot was associated with reduced aortic cross-clamp time (median 70 vs 84 minutes; P < .001). Patients undergoing SAVR using Core-Knot were less likely to have postoperative aortic regurgitation (P < .001). Early mortality, and also the rates of early adverse events (including all cardiac, neurologic, and renal complications), and the immediate postprocedure echo findings were similar in the 2 groups. In multivariate analysis, the use of Core-Knot was associated with reduced postoperative mean gradient across the aortic valve and reduced occurrence of postoperative aortic regurgitation. Older age and larger valve size were other predictors of reduced postoperative mean gradients. The use of an automatic fastener (Core-Knot) in surgical aortic valve replacement cases reduce aortic cross-clamp time and help eliminate postoperative paravalvular aortic regurgitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6081056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60810562018-08-17 Automated fastener (Core-Knot) versus manually tied knots in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: Impact on cross-clamp time and short-term echocardiographic results Loberman, Dan Mohr, Rephael Pirundini, Paul A. Yazdchi, Farhang Rinewalt, Daniel Ziv-Baran, Tomer Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article The Core-Knot device is an automatic fastener used mainly in minimally invasive heart valve surgery procedures, to facilitate knot tying. The purpose of this report is to compare ischemic time and outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacements (SAVRs) utilizing the Core-Knot device compared with manually tied knots. Between January, 2014 and December, 2016, 119 patients underwent SAVR in Cape Cod Hospital. We compared patient's characteristics, cross-clamp time, and outcomes of 75 patients who underwent SAVR using Core-Knot to those of 44 operated using manually tied knots. Patient characteristics were similar between groups. Patients in the Core-Knot group had higher preoperative aortic valve area and higher ejection fraction. The use of Core-Knot was associated with reduced aortic cross-clamp time (median 70 vs 84 minutes; P < .001). Patients undergoing SAVR using Core-Knot were less likely to have postoperative aortic regurgitation (P < .001). Early mortality, and also the rates of early adverse events (including all cardiac, neurologic, and renal complications), and the immediate postprocedure echo findings were similar in the 2 groups. In multivariate analysis, the use of Core-Knot was associated with reduced postoperative mean gradient across the aortic valve and reduced occurrence of postoperative aortic regurgitation. Older age and larger valve size were other predictors of reduced postoperative mean gradients. The use of an automatic fastener (Core-Knot) in surgical aortic valve replacement cases reduce aortic cross-clamp time and help eliminate postoperative paravalvular aortic regurgitation. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6081056/ /pubmed/30075552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011657 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Loberman, Dan
Mohr, Rephael
Pirundini, Paul A.
Yazdchi, Farhang
Rinewalt, Daniel
Ziv-Baran, Tomer
Automated fastener (Core-Knot) versus manually tied knots in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: Impact on cross-clamp time and short-term echocardiographic results
title Automated fastener (Core-Knot) versus manually tied knots in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: Impact on cross-clamp time and short-term echocardiographic results
title_full Automated fastener (Core-Knot) versus manually tied knots in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: Impact on cross-clamp time and short-term echocardiographic results
title_fullStr Automated fastener (Core-Knot) versus manually tied knots in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: Impact on cross-clamp time and short-term echocardiographic results
title_full_unstemmed Automated fastener (Core-Knot) versus manually tied knots in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: Impact on cross-clamp time and short-term echocardiographic results
title_short Automated fastener (Core-Knot) versus manually tied knots in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: Impact on cross-clamp time and short-term echocardiographic results
title_sort automated fastener (core-knot) versus manually tied knots in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: impact on cross-clamp time and short-term echocardiographic results
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30075552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011657
work_keys_str_mv AT lobermandan automatedfastenercoreknotversusmanuallytiedknotsinpatientsundergoingaorticvalvereplacementimpactoncrossclamptimeandshorttermechocardiographicresults
AT mohrrephael automatedfastenercoreknotversusmanuallytiedknotsinpatientsundergoingaorticvalvereplacementimpactoncrossclamptimeandshorttermechocardiographicresults
AT pirundinipaula automatedfastenercoreknotversusmanuallytiedknotsinpatientsundergoingaorticvalvereplacementimpactoncrossclamptimeandshorttermechocardiographicresults
AT yazdchifarhang automatedfastenercoreknotversusmanuallytiedknotsinpatientsundergoingaorticvalvereplacementimpactoncrossclamptimeandshorttermechocardiographicresults
AT rinewaltdaniel automatedfastenercoreknotversusmanuallytiedknotsinpatientsundergoingaorticvalvereplacementimpactoncrossclamptimeandshorttermechocardiographicresults
AT zivbarantomer automatedfastenercoreknotversusmanuallytiedknotsinpatientsundergoingaorticvalvereplacementimpactoncrossclamptimeandshorttermechocardiographicresults