Cargando…

Failure of ulipristal acetate treatment as an indication for uterine malignancy: Two case reports

INTRODUCTION: To study the clinical, pathological and therapeutic implications of ulipristal acetate (UPA) treatment failure in patients affected by uterine smooth muscle tumors. CASE PRESENTATION: Two patients affected by uterine leiomyosarcoma were preoperatively diagnosed as uterine leiomyomas an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santoro, Angela, Angelico, Giuseppe, Arciuolo, Damiano, Inzani, Frediano, Fanfani, Francesco, Romualdi, Daniela, Scambia, Giovanni, Zannoni, Gian Franco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30075519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011532
_version_ 1783345595626291200
author Santoro, Angela
Angelico, Giuseppe
Arciuolo, Damiano
Inzani, Frediano
Fanfani, Francesco
Romualdi, Daniela
Scambia, Giovanni
Zannoni, Gian Franco
author_facet Santoro, Angela
Angelico, Giuseppe
Arciuolo, Damiano
Inzani, Frediano
Fanfani, Francesco
Romualdi, Daniela
Scambia, Giovanni
Zannoni, Gian Franco
author_sort Santoro, Angela
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To study the clinical, pathological and therapeutic implications of ulipristal acetate (UPA) treatment failure in patients affected by uterine smooth muscle tumors. CASE PRESENTATION: Two patients affected by uterine leiomyosarcoma were preoperatively diagnosed as uterine leiomyomas and, thus, treated conservatively with UPA and morcellation. Both patients experienced a worsening of symptoms (persistent bleeding) after 3 month of treatment with UPA. Therefore a myomectomy with morcellation of tumor specimens was performed. Pathological examination of morcellated specimens revealed the unsuspected diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma based on the presence of severe nuclear atypia, tumor necrosis and increased mitotic activity. Unfortunately after 6 month of follow-up, 1 patient died for multiple peritoneal recurrences and lung metastases. The other patient is still alive after 3 month of follow-up and shows no local recurrences or metastases. CONCLUSION: Our reported cases emphasize that the poor or absent response to UPA treatment in addition to the instrumental evidence of a single mass may be indicative of the presence of an unsuspected leiomyosarcoma clinically and radiologically misdiagnosed as leiomyoma. The awareness of this possibility would avoid a delay in the diagnosis as well as unuseful and potentially dangerous treatments such as morcellation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6081078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60810782018-08-17 Failure of ulipristal acetate treatment as an indication for uterine malignancy: Two case reports Santoro, Angela Angelico, Giuseppe Arciuolo, Damiano Inzani, Frediano Fanfani, Francesco Romualdi, Daniela Scambia, Giovanni Zannoni, Gian Franco Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article INTRODUCTION: To study the clinical, pathological and therapeutic implications of ulipristal acetate (UPA) treatment failure in patients affected by uterine smooth muscle tumors. CASE PRESENTATION: Two patients affected by uterine leiomyosarcoma were preoperatively diagnosed as uterine leiomyomas and, thus, treated conservatively with UPA and morcellation. Both patients experienced a worsening of symptoms (persistent bleeding) after 3 month of treatment with UPA. Therefore a myomectomy with morcellation of tumor specimens was performed. Pathological examination of morcellated specimens revealed the unsuspected diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma based on the presence of severe nuclear atypia, tumor necrosis and increased mitotic activity. Unfortunately after 6 month of follow-up, 1 patient died for multiple peritoneal recurrences and lung metastases. The other patient is still alive after 3 month of follow-up and shows no local recurrences or metastases. CONCLUSION: Our reported cases emphasize that the poor or absent response to UPA treatment in addition to the instrumental evidence of a single mass may be indicative of the presence of an unsuspected leiomyosarcoma clinically and radiologically misdiagnosed as leiomyoma. The awareness of this possibility would avoid a delay in the diagnosis as well as unuseful and potentially dangerous treatments such as morcellation. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6081078/ /pubmed/30075519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011532 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Santoro, Angela
Angelico, Giuseppe
Arciuolo, Damiano
Inzani, Frediano
Fanfani, Francesco
Romualdi, Daniela
Scambia, Giovanni
Zannoni, Gian Franco
Failure of ulipristal acetate treatment as an indication for uterine malignancy: Two case reports
title Failure of ulipristal acetate treatment as an indication for uterine malignancy: Two case reports
title_full Failure of ulipristal acetate treatment as an indication for uterine malignancy: Two case reports
title_fullStr Failure of ulipristal acetate treatment as an indication for uterine malignancy: Two case reports
title_full_unstemmed Failure of ulipristal acetate treatment as an indication for uterine malignancy: Two case reports
title_short Failure of ulipristal acetate treatment as an indication for uterine malignancy: Two case reports
title_sort failure of ulipristal acetate treatment as an indication for uterine malignancy: two case reports
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30075519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011532
work_keys_str_mv AT santoroangela failureofulipristalacetatetreatmentasanindicationforuterinemalignancytwocasereports
AT angelicogiuseppe failureofulipristalacetatetreatmentasanindicationforuterinemalignancytwocasereports
AT arciuolodamiano failureofulipristalacetatetreatmentasanindicationforuterinemalignancytwocasereports
AT inzanifrediano failureofulipristalacetatetreatmentasanindicationforuterinemalignancytwocasereports
AT fanfanifrancesco failureofulipristalacetatetreatmentasanindicationforuterinemalignancytwocasereports
AT romualdidaniela failureofulipristalacetatetreatmentasanindicationforuterinemalignancytwocasereports
AT scambiagiovanni failureofulipristalacetatetreatmentasanindicationforuterinemalignancytwocasereports
AT zannonigianfranco failureofulipristalacetatetreatmentasanindicationforuterinemalignancytwocasereports