Cargando…

Comparisons of the accuracy of radiation diagnostic modalities in brain tumor: A nonrandomized, nonexperimental, cross-sectional trial

Tumor morphology improved sensitivity, accuracy, and specificity of the diagnosis, but all diagnostic techniques have attenuation correction issues. To compare computed tomographic (CT), positron emission tomographic (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of patients with brain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Qian, Li, Yongmei, Luo, Lan, Diao, Wanglun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30075495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011256
_version_ 1783345613318914048
author Luo, Qian
Li, Yongmei
Luo, Lan
Diao, Wanglun
author_facet Luo, Qian
Li, Yongmei
Luo, Lan
Diao, Wanglun
author_sort Luo, Qian
collection PubMed
description Tumor morphology improved sensitivity, accuracy, and specificity of the diagnosis, but all diagnostic techniques have attenuation correction issues. To compare computed tomographic (CT), positron emission tomographic (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of patients with brain tumor in a Chinese setting. A nonrandomized, nonexperimental, cross-sectional trial. Jining No. 1 People's Hospital, China. In total, 127 patients who had clinically confirmed a brain tumor were included in the cross-sectional study. Patients were subjected to brain CT, MRI, and PET. The tumors resected after brain surgery were subjected to morphological diagnosis. Statistical analysis of data of surgically removed tumor and that of different methods of diagnosis was performed using Wilcoxon test following Tukey–Kramer test. Spearmen correlation was performed between diagnostic modalities and in vivo morphology. Results were considered significant at 99% of confidence level. The data of diameter and volume of tumor derived from CT (Spearman r = 0.9845 and 0.9706), and MRI (Spearman r = 0.955 and 0.2378) were failed to correlate with that of that of the surgically removed tumor. However, prediction of diameter and volume of the tumor by PET (Spearman r = 0.9922 and 0.9921) were correlated with that of the surgically removed tumor. CT and MRI were failed to quantified pituitary adenomas. The study was recommended PET for assessment of brain tumor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6081153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60811532018-08-17 Comparisons of the accuracy of radiation diagnostic modalities in brain tumor: A nonrandomized, nonexperimental, cross-sectional trial Luo, Qian Li, Yongmei Luo, Lan Diao, Wanglun Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article Tumor morphology improved sensitivity, accuracy, and specificity of the diagnosis, but all diagnostic techniques have attenuation correction issues. To compare computed tomographic (CT), positron emission tomographic (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of patients with brain tumor in a Chinese setting. A nonrandomized, nonexperimental, cross-sectional trial. Jining No. 1 People's Hospital, China. In total, 127 patients who had clinically confirmed a brain tumor were included in the cross-sectional study. Patients were subjected to brain CT, MRI, and PET. The tumors resected after brain surgery were subjected to morphological diagnosis. Statistical analysis of data of surgically removed tumor and that of different methods of diagnosis was performed using Wilcoxon test following Tukey–Kramer test. Spearmen correlation was performed between diagnostic modalities and in vivo morphology. Results were considered significant at 99% of confidence level. The data of diameter and volume of tumor derived from CT (Spearman r = 0.9845 and 0.9706), and MRI (Spearman r = 0.955 and 0.2378) were failed to correlate with that of that of the surgically removed tumor. However, prediction of diameter and volume of the tumor by PET (Spearman r = 0.9922 and 0.9921) were correlated with that of the surgically removed tumor. CT and MRI were failed to quantified pituitary adenomas. The study was recommended PET for assessment of brain tumor. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6081153/ /pubmed/30075495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011256 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Luo, Qian
Li, Yongmei
Luo, Lan
Diao, Wanglun
Comparisons of the accuracy of radiation diagnostic modalities in brain tumor: A nonrandomized, nonexperimental, cross-sectional trial
title Comparisons of the accuracy of radiation diagnostic modalities in brain tumor: A nonrandomized, nonexperimental, cross-sectional trial
title_full Comparisons of the accuracy of radiation diagnostic modalities in brain tumor: A nonrandomized, nonexperimental, cross-sectional trial
title_fullStr Comparisons of the accuracy of radiation diagnostic modalities in brain tumor: A nonrandomized, nonexperimental, cross-sectional trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons of the accuracy of radiation diagnostic modalities in brain tumor: A nonrandomized, nonexperimental, cross-sectional trial
title_short Comparisons of the accuracy of radiation diagnostic modalities in brain tumor: A nonrandomized, nonexperimental, cross-sectional trial
title_sort comparisons of the accuracy of radiation diagnostic modalities in brain tumor: a nonrandomized, nonexperimental, cross-sectional trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30075495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011256
work_keys_str_mv AT luoqian comparisonsoftheaccuracyofradiationdiagnosticmodalitiesinbraintumoranonrandomizednonexperimentalcrosssectionaltrial
AT liyongmei comparisonsoftheaccuracyofradiationdiagnosticmodalitiesinbraintumoranonrandomizednonexperimentalcrosssectionaltrial
AT luolan comparisonsoftheaccuracyofradiationdiagnosticmodalitiesinbraintumoranonrandomizednonexperimentalcrosssectionaltrial
AT diaowanglun comparisonsoftheaccuracyofradiationdiagnosticmodalitiesinbraintumoranonrandomizednonexperimentalcrosssectionaltrial