Cargando…

Surgical site infections after pancreatic surgery in the era of enhanced recovery protocols

Few data exist on risk factors (RF) for surgical site infections (SSI) among patients treated in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway. This study aimed to assess RF for SSI after pancreas surgery in a non-ERAS group and an ERAS cohort. An exploratory retrospective analysis of all pancre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joliat, Gaëtan-Romain, Sauvain, Marc-Olivier, Petermann, David, Halkic, Nermin, Demartines, Nicolas, Schäfer, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30075582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011728
_version_ 1783345621187428352
author Joliat, Gaëtan-Romain
Sauvain, Marc-Olivier
Petermann, David
Halkic, Nermin
Demartines, Nicolas
Schäfer, Markus
author_facet Joliat, Gaëtan-Romain
Sauvain, Marc-Olivier
Petermann, David
Halkic, Nermin
Demartines, Nicolas
Schäfer, Markus
author_sort Joliat, Gaëtan-Romain
collection PubMed
description Few data exist on risk factors (RF) for surgical site infections (SSI) among patients treated in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway. This study aimed to assess RF for SSI after pancreas surgery in a non-ERAS group and an ERAS cohort. An exploratory retrospective analysis of all pancreas surgeries prospectively collected (01/2000–12/2015) was performed. RF for SSI were calculated using uni- and multivariable binary logistic regressions in non-ERAS and ERAS patients. Pancreas surgery was performed in 549 patients. Among them, 144 presented a SSI (26%). In the non-ERAS group (n = 377), SSI incidence was 27% (99/377), and RF for SSI were male gender and preoperative biliary stenting. Since 2012, 172 consecutive patients were managed within an ERAS pathway. Forty-five patients (26%) had SSI. On multivariable analysis no RF for SSI in the ERAS cohort was found. In the ERAS group, patients with a pathway compliance ≤70% had higher occurrence of SSI (30/45 = 67% vs. 7/127 = 6%, p < 0.001) and patients with and without SSI had similar median overall compliances (77%, IQR 71–80 vs. 80%, IQR 73–83, p = 0.097). In the non-ERAS cohort, male gender and preoperative biliary stenting were RF for SSI, whereas in the ERAS group no RF for SSI was found. In an ERAS pathway, having an overall compliance >70% might diminish the SSI rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6081186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60811862018-08-17 Surgical site infections after pancreatic surgery in the era of enhanced recovery protocols Joliat, Gaëtan-Romain Sauvain, Marc-Olivier Petermann, David Halkic, Nermin Demartines, Nicolas Schäfer, Markus Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article Few data exist on risk factors (RF) for surgical site infections (SSI) among patients treated in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway. This study aimed to assess RF for SSI after pancreas surgery in a non-ERAS group and an ERAS cohort. An exploratory retrospective analysis of all pancreas surgeries prospectively collected (01/2000–12/2015) was performed. RF for SSI were calculated using uni- and multivariable binary logistic regressions in non-ERAS and ERAS patients. Pancreas surgery was performed in 549 patients. Among them, 144 presented a SSI (26%). In the non-ERAS group (n = 377), SSI incidence was 27% (99/377), and RF for SSI were male gender and preoperative biliary stenting. Since 2012, 172 consecutive patients were managed within an ERAS pathway. Forty-five patients (26%) had SSI. On multivariable analysis no RF for SSI in the ERAS cohort was found. In the ERAS group, patients with a pathway compliance ≤70% had higher occurrence of SSI (30/45 = 67% vs. 7/127 = 6%, p < 0.001) and patients with and without SSI had similar median overall compliances (77%, IQR 71–80 vs. 80%, IQR 73–83, p = 0.097). In the non-ERAS cohort, male gender and preoperative biliary stenting were RF for SSI, whereas in the ERAS group no RF for SSI was found. In an ERAS pathway, having an overall compliance >70% might diminish the SSI rate. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6081186/ /pubmed/30075582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011728 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Joliat, Gaëtan-Romain
Sauvain, Marc-Olivier
Petermann, David
Halkic, Nermin
Demartines, Nicolas
Schäfer, Markus
Surgical site infections after pancreatic surgery in the era of enhanced recovery protocols
title Surgical site infections after pancreatic surgery in the era of enhanced recovery protocols
title_full Surgical site infections after pancreatic surgery in the era of enhanced recovery protocols
title_fullStr Surgical site infections after pancreatic surgery in the era of enhanced recovery protocols
title_full_unstemmed Surgical site infections after pancreatic surgery in the era of enhanced recovery protocols
title_short Surgical site infections after pancreatic surgery in the era of enhanced recovery protocols
title_sort surgical site infections after pancreatic surgery in the era of enhanced recovery protocols
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30075582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011728
work_keys_str_mv AT joliatgaetanromain surgicalsiteinfectionsafterpancreaticsurgeryintheeraofenhancedrecoveryprotocols
AT sauvainmarcolivier surgicalsiteinfectionsafterpancreaticsurgeryintheeraofenhancedrecoveryprotocols
AT petermanndavid surgicalsiteinfectionsafterpancreaticsurgeryintheeraofenhancedrecoveryprotocols
AT halkicnermin surgicalsiteinfectionsafterpancreaticsurgeryintheeraofenhancedrecoveryprotocols
AT demartinesnicolas surgicalsiteinfectionsafterpancreaticsurgeryintheeraofenhancedrecoveryprotocols
AT schafermarkus surgicalsiteinfectionsafterpancreaticsurgeryintheeraofenhancedrecoveryprotocols