Cargando…

Painful Recall in Elective Electrical Cardioversion with Propofol and the Need for Additional Analgesia

INTRODUCTION: Electrical cardioversion (ECV) is a short but painful procedure for treating cardiac dysrhythmias. There is a wide variation regarding the medication strategy to facilitate this procedure. Many different sedative techniques for ECV are described. Currently, the optimal medication strat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Winden, D. F. M., Westra, A., Dennesen, P. J. W., Monnink, S. H. J., Verdouw, B. C., le Kluse, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30140454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2363062
_version_ 1783345661679239168
author van Winden, D. F. M.
Westra, A.
Dennesen, P. J. W.
Monnink, S. H. J.
Verdouw, B. C.
le Kluse, R.
author_facet van Winden, D. F. M.
Westra, A.
Dennesen, P. J. W.
Monnink, S. H. J.
Verdouw, B. C.
le Kluse, R.
author_sort van Winden, D. F. M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Electrical cardioversion (ECV) is a short but painful procedure for treating cardiac dysrhythmias. There is a wide variation regarding the medication strategy to facilitate this procedure. Many different sedative techniques for ECV are described. Currently, the optimal medication strategy to prevent pain in ECV has yet to be established. The role for additional analgesic agents to prevent pain during the procedure remains controversial, and evidence is limited. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicenter study to determine the incidence of painful recall in ECV with propofol as a sole agent for sedation, in order to assess the indication for additional opioids. In all patients, sedation was induced with propofol titrated till loss of eyelash reflex and nonresponsiveness to stimuli, corresponding to Ramsay Sedation Score level 5-6. ECV was performed with extracardiac biphasic electrical shocks. The primary outcome was painful recall of the procedure, defined as numeric pain rating scale (NRS) ≥ 1. NRS ≥ 4 is considered inadequately treated pain. Secondary outcome parameters were pain at the side of the defipads and muscle pain after ECV. RESULTS: A total of 232 patients were enrolled in this study. Six patients were excluded due to missing data or violation of study protocol. Three patients reported recall of the procedure, and one patient (0.4%) reported recall of severe pain during the procedure with NRS 7. Two patients (0.9%) reported recall of mild pain with NRS 1–3. Complete amnesia was observed in 223 patients (98.7%), with NRS 0. The mean of the total dose of propofol was 1.1 mg/kg. Fifteen patients (6.6%) experienced pain at the side of the defipads, and six patients (2.7%) complained of muscle pain after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective multicenter study, propofol as a sole agent provided good conditions for ECV with a low incidence of recall. Effective sedation and complete amnesia was achieved in 98.7% of the patients, 0.4% of patients reported recall of severe pain during the procedure, and 0.9% of patients experienced mild pain during the ECV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6081497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60814972018-08-23 Painful Recall in Elective Electrical Cardioversion with Propofol and the Need for Additional Analgesia van Winden, D. F. M. Westra, A. Dennesen, P. J. W. Monnink, S. H. J. Verdouw, B. C. le Kluse, R. Cardiol Res Pract Research Article INTRODUCTION: Electrical cardioversion (ECV) is a short but painful procedure for treating cardiac dysrhythmias. There is a wide variation regarding the medication strategy to facilitate this procedure. Many different sedative techniques for ECV are described. Currently, the optimal medication strategy to prevent pain in ECV has yet to be established. The role for additional analgesic agents to prevent pain during the procedure remains controversial, and evidence is limited. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicenter study to determine the incidence of painful recall in ECV with propofol as a sole agent for sedation, in order to assess the indication for additional opioids. In all patients, sedation was induced with propofol titrated till loss of eyelash reflex and nonresponsiveness to stimuli, corresponding to Ramsay Sedation Score level 5-6. ECV was performed with extracardiac biphasic electrical shocks. The primary outcome was painful recall of the procedure, defined as numeric pain rating scale (NRS) ≥ 1. NRS ≥ 4 is considered inadequately treated pain. Secondary outcome parameters were pain at the side of the defipads and muscle pain after ECV. RESULTS: A total of 232 patients were enrolled in this study. Six patients were excluded due to missing data or violation of study protocol. Three patients reported recall of the procedure, and one patient (0.4%) reported recall of severe pain during the procedure with NRS 7. Two patients (0.9%) reported recall of mild pain with NRS 1–3. Complete amnesia was observed in 223 patients (98.7%), with NRS 0. The mean of the total dose of propofol was 1.1 mg/kg. Fifteen patients (6.6%) experienced pain at the side of the defipads, and six patients (2.7%) complained of muscle pain after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective multicenter study, propofol as a sole agent provided good conditions for ECV with a low incidence of recall. Effective sedation and complete amnesia was achieved in 98.7% of the patients, 0.4% of patients reported recall of severe pain during the procedure, and 0.9% of patients experienced mild pain during the ECV. Hindawi 2018-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6081497/ /pubmed/30140454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2363062 Text en Copyright © 2018 D. F. M. van Winden et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Winden, D. F. M.
Westra, A.
Dennesen, P. J. W.
Monnink, S. H. J.
Verdouw, B. C.
le Kluse, R.
Painful Recall in Elective Electrical Cardioversion with Propofol and the Need for Additional Analgesia
title Painful Recall in Elective Electrical Cardioversion with Propofol and the Need for Additional Analgesia
title_full Painful Recall in Elective Electrical Cardioversion with Propofol and the Need for Additional Analgesia
title_fullStr Painful Recall in Elective Electrical Cardioversion with Propofol and the Need for Additional Analgesia
title_full_unstemmed Painful Recall in Elective Electrical Cardioversion with Propofol and the Need for Additional Analgesia
title_short Painful Recall in Elective Electrical Cardioversion with Propofol and the Need for Additional Analgesia
title_sort painful recall in elective electrical cardioversion with propofol and the need for additional analgesia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30140454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2363062
work_keys_str_mv AT vanwindendfm painfulrecallinelectiveelectricalcardioversionwithpropofolandtheneedforadditionalanalgesia
AT westraa painfulrecallinelectiveelectricalcardioversionwithpropofolandtheneedforadditionalanalgesia
AT dennesenpjw painfulrecallinelectiveelectricalcardioversionwithpropofolandtheneedforadditionalanalgesia
AT monninkshj painfulrecallinelectiveelectricalcardioversionwithpropofolandtheneedforadditionalanalgesia
AT verdouwbc painfulrecallinelectiveelectricalcardioversionwithpropofolandtheneedforadditionalanalgesia
AT lekluser painfulrecallinelectiveelectricalcardioversionwithpropofolandtheneedforadditionalanalgesia