Cargando…
Reliability and Accuracy of Peri-Interventional Stenosis Grading in Peripheral Artery Disease Using Color-Coded Quantitative Fluoroscopy: A Phantom Study Comparing a Clinical and Scientific Postprocessing Software
PURPOSE: To assess quantitative stenosis grading by color-coded fluoroscopy using an in vitro pulsatile flow phantom. METHODS: Three different stenotic tubes (80%, 60%, and 40% diameter restriction) and a nonstenotic reference tube were compared regarding their different flow behavior by using contr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30140698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6180138 |
_version_ | 1783345665627127808 |
---|---|
author | Ghibes, Patrick Partovi, Sasan Grözinger, Gerd Martirosian, Petros Schick, Fritz Nikolaou, Konstantin Ketelsen, Dominik Syha, Roland Grosse, Ulrich |
author_facet | Ghibes, Patrick Partovi, Sasan Grözinger, Gerd Martirosian, Petros Schick, Fritz Nikolaou, Konstantin Ketelsen, Dominik Syha, Roland Grosse, Ulrich |
author_sort | Ghibes, Patrick |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess quantitative stenosis grading by color-coded fluoroscopy using an in vitro pulsatile flow phantom. METHODS: Three different stenotic tubes (80%, 60%, and 40% diameter restriction) and a nonstenotic reference tube were compared regarding their different flow behavior by using contrast-enhanced fluoroscopy with a flat-detector system for visualisation purposes. Time-density curves (TDC), area under the curve (AUC), time-to-peak (TTP), and different ROI sizes were analyzed in three independent measurements using two different postprocessing software solutions. In addition, exemplary TDCs of a patient with a high-grade stenosis before and after stent angioplasty were acquired. RESULTS: Color-coded fluoroscopy enabled depiction of differences in AUC and TDC between high-grade (80%), middle (60%), low-grade (40%), and nonstenotic tubes. The best correlation between high-, middle-, and low-grade stenosis was appreciated in ROIs behind the stenosis. This effect was enhanced by using longer integration times (5s, 7s) and a maximum frame rate of image acquisition for analysis (correlation coefficient rho=0.9284 at 5s). TTP showed no significant differences between high- and low-grade stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Various clinical studies in the literature already demonstrated reproducible and reliable stenosis grading by analyzing TDCs acquired with color-coded fluoroscopy. In contrast to TTP, AUC values derived in ROIs behind the stenosis proved to be reliable parameters for stenosis grading. However, our results also demonstrate that several factors are able to significantly impact the evaluation of AUC values. More precisely, accuracy of acquired AUC values can be improved by choosing longer integration times, a large ROI size adapted to the vessel diameter, and a higher frame rate of image acquisition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6081527 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60815272018-08-23 Reliability and Accuracy of Peri-Interventional Stenosis Grading in Peripheral Artery Disease Using Color-Coded Quantitative Fluoroscopy: A Phantom Study Comparing a Clinical and Scientific Postprocessing Software Ghibes, Patrick Partovi, Sasan Grözinger, Gerd Martirosian, Petros Schick, Fritz Nikolaou, Konstantin Ketelsen, Dominik Syha, Roland Grosse, Ulrich Biomed Res Int Research Article PURPOSE: To assess quantitative stenosis grading by color-coded fluoroscopy using an in vitro pulsatile flow phantom. METHODS: Three different stenotic tubes (80%, 60%, and 40% diameter restriction) and a nonstenotic reference tube were compared regarding their different flow behavior by using contrast-enhanced fluoroscopy with a flat-detector system for visualisation purposes. Time-density curves (TDC), area under the curve (AUC), time-to-peak (TTP), and different ROI sizes were analyzed in three independent measurements using two different postprocessing software solutions. In addition, exemplary TDCs of a patient with a high-grade stenosis before and after stent angioplasty were acquired. RESULTS: Color-coded fluoroscopy enabled depiction of differences in AUC and TDC between high-grade (80%), middle (60%), low-grade (40%), and nonstenotic tubes. The best correlation between high-, middle-, and low-grade stenosis was appreciated in ROIs behind the stenosis. This effect was enhanced by using longer integration times (5s, 7s) and a maximum frame rate of image acquisition for analysis (correlation coefficient rho=0.9284 at 5s). TTP showed no significant differences between high- and low-grade stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Various clinical studies in the literature already demonstrated reproducible and reliable stenosis grading by analyzing TDCs acquired with color-coded fluoroscopy. In contrast to TTP, AUC values derived in ROIs behind the stenosis proved to be reliable parameters for stenosis grading. However, our results also demonstrate that several factors are able to significantly impact the evaluation of AUC values. More precisely, accuracy of acquired AUC values can be improved by choosing longer integration times, a large ROI size adapted to the vessel diameter, and a higher frame rate of image acquisition. Hindawi 2018-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6081527/ /pubmed/30140698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6180138 Text en Copyright © 2018 Patrick Ghibes et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ghibes, Patrick Partovi, Sasan Grözinger, Gerd Martirosian, Petros Schick, Fritz Nikolaou, Konstantin Ketelsen, Dominik Syha, Roland Grosse, Ulrich Reliability and Accuracy of Peri-Interventional Stenosis Grading in Peripheral Artery Disease Using Color-Coded Quantitative Fluoroscopy: A Phantom Study Comparing a Clinical and Scientific Postprocessing Software |
title | Reliability and Accuracy of Peri-Interventional Stenosis Grading in Peripheral Artery Disease Using Color-Coded Quantitative Fluoroscopy: A Phantom Study Comparing a Clinical and Scientific Postprocessing Software |
title_full | Reliability and Accuracy of Peri-Interventional Stenosis Grading in Peripheral Artery Disease Using Color-Coded Quantitative Fluoroscopy: A Phantom Study Comparing a Clinical and Scientific Postprocessing Software |
title_fullStr | Reliability and Accuracy of Peri-Interventional Stenosis Grading in Peripheral Artery Disease Using Color-Coded Quantitative Fluoroscopy: A Phantom Study Comparing a Clinical and Scientific Postprocessing Software |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and Accuracy of Peri-Interventional Stenosis Grading in Peripheral Artery Disease Using Color-Coded Quantitative Fluoroscopy: A Phantom Study Comparing a Clinical and Scientific Postprocessing Software |
title_short | Reliability and Accuracy of Peri-Interventional Stenosis Grading in Peripheral Artery Disease Using Color-Coded Quantitative Fluoroscopy: A Phantom Study Comparing a Clinical and Scientific Postprocessing Software |
title_sort | reliability and accuracy of peri-interventional stenosis grading in peripheral artery disease using color-coded quantitative fluoroscopy: a phantom study comparing a clinical and scientific postprocessing software |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30140698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6180138 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghibespatrick reliabilityandaccuracyofperiinterventionalstenosisgradinginperipheralarterydiseaseusingcolorcodedquantitativefluoroscopyaphantomstudycomparingaclinicalandscientificpostprocessingsoftware AT partovisasan reliabilityandaccuracyofperiinterventionalstenosisgradinginperipheralarterydiseaseusingcolorcodedquantitativefluoroscopyaphantomstudycomparingaclinicalandscientificpostprocessingsoftware AT grozingergerd reliabilityandaccuracyofperiinterventionalstenosisgradinginperipheralarterydiseaseusingcolorcodedquantitativefluoroscopyaphantomstudycomparingaclinicalandscientificpostprocessingsoftware AT martirosianpetros reliabilityandaccuracyofperiinterventionalstenosisgradinginperipheralarterydiseaseusingcolorcodedquantitativefluoroscopyaphantomstudycomparingaclinicalandscientificpostprocessingsoftware AT schickfritz reliabilityandaccuracyofperiinterventionalstenosisgradinginperipheralarterydiseaseusingcolorcodedquantitativefluoroscopyaphantomstudycomparingaclinicalandscientificpostprocessingsoftware AT nikolaoukonstantin reliabilityandaccuracyofperiinterventionalstenosisgradinginperipheralarterydiseaseusingcolorcodedquantitativefluoroscopyaphantomstudycomparingaclinicalandscientificpostprocessingsoftware AT ketelsendominik reliabilityandaccuracyofperiinterventionalstenosisgradinginperipheralarterydiseaseusingcolorcodedquantitativefluoroscopyaphantomstudycomparingaclinicalandscientificpostprocessingsoftware AT syharoland reliabilityandaccuracyofperiinterventionalstenosisgradinginperipheralarterydiseaseusingcolorcodedquantitativefluoroscopyaphantomstudycomparingaclinicalandscientificpostprocessingsoftware AT grosseulrich reliabilityandaccuracyofperiinterventionalstenosisgradinginperipheralarterydiseaseusingcolorcodedquantitativefluoroscopyaphantomstudycomparingaclinicalandscientificpostprocessingsoftware |