Cargando…

Reliability and Accuracy of Peri-Interventional Stenosis Grading in Peripheral Artery Disease Using Color-Coded Quantitative Fluoroscopy: A Phantom Study Comparing a Clinical and Scientific Postprocessing Software

PURPOSE: To assess quantitative stenosis grading by color-coded fluoroscopy using an in vitro pulsatile flow phantom. METHODS: Three different stenotic tubes (80%, 60%, and 40% diameter restriction) and a nonstenotic reference tube were compared regarding their different flow behavior by using contr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghibes, Patrick, Partovi, Sasan, Grözinger, Gerd, Martirosian, Petros, Schick, Fritz, Nikolaou, Konstantin, Ketelsen, Dominik, Syha, Roland, Grosse, Ulrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30140698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6180138
_version_ 1783345665627127808
author Ghibes, Patrick
Partovi, Sasan
Grözinger, Gerd
Martirosian, Petros
Schick, Fritz
Nikolaou, Konstantin
Ketelsen, Dominik
Syha, Roland
Grosse, Ulrich
author_facet Ghibes, Patrick
Partovi, Sasan
Grözinger, Gerd
Martirosian, Petros
Schick, Fritz
Nikolaou, Konstantin
Ketelsen, Dominik
Syha, Roland
Grosse, Ulrich
author_sort Ghibes, Patrick
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess quantitative stenosis grading by color-coded fluoroscopy using an in vitro pulsatile flow phantom. METHODS: Three different stenotic tubes (80%, 60%, and 40% diameter restriction) and a nonstenotic reference tube were compared regarding their different flow behavior by using contrast-enhanced fluoroscopy with a flat-detector system for visualisation purposes. Time-density curves (TDC), area under the curve (AUC), time-to-peak (TTP), and different ROI sizes were analyzed in three independent measurements using two different postprocessing software solutions. In addition, exemplary TDCs of a patient with a high-grade stenosis before and after stent angioplasty were acquired. RESULTS: Color-coded fluoroscopy enabled depiction of differences in AUC and TDC between high-grade (80%), middle (60%), low-grade (40%), and nonstenotic tubes. The best correlation between high-, middle-, and low-grade stenosis was appreciated in ROIs behind the stenosis. This effect was enhanced by using longer integration times (5s, 7s) and a maximum frame rate of image acquisition for analysis (correlation coefficient rho=0.9284 at 5s). TTP showed no significant differences between high- and low-grade stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Various clinical studies in the literature already demonstrated reproducible and reliable stenosis grading by analyzing TDCs acquired with color-coded fluoroscopy. In contrast to TTP, AUC values derived in ROIs behind the stenosis proved to be reliable parameters for stenosis grading. However, our results also demonstrate that several factors are able to significantly impact the evaluation of AUC values. More precisely, accuracy of acquired AUC values can be improved by choosing longer integration times, a large ROI size adapted to the vessel diameter, and a higher frame rate of image acquisition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6081527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60815272018-08-23 Reliability and Accuracy of Peri-Interventional Stenosis Grading in Peripheral Artery Disease Using Color-Coded Quantitative Fluoroscopy: A Phantom Study Comparing a Clinical and Scientific Postprocessing Software Ghibes, Patrick Partovi, Sasan Grözinger, Gerd Martirosian, Petros Schick, Fritz Nikolaou, Konstantin Ketelsen, Dominik Syha, Roland Grosse, Ulrich Biomed Res Int Research Article PURPOSE: To assess quantitative stenosis grading by color-coded fluoroscopy using an in vitro pulsatile flow phantom. METHODS: Three different stenotic tubes (80%, 60%, and 40% diameter restriction) and a nonstenotic reference tube were compared regarding their different flow behavior by using contrast-enhanced fluoroscopy with a flat-detector system for visualisation purposes. Time-density curves (TDC), area under the curve (AUC), time-to-peak (TTP), and different ROI sizes were analyzed in three independent measurements using two different postprocessing software solutions. In addition, exemplary TDCs of a patient with a high-grade stenosis before and after stent angioplasty were acquired. RESULTS: Color-coded fluoroscopy enabled depiction of differences in AUC and TDC between high-grade (80%), middle (60%), low-grade (40%), and nonstenotic tubes. The best correlation between high-, middle-, and low-grade stenosis was appreciated in ROIs behind the stenosis. This effect was enhanced by using longer integration times (5s, 7s) and a maximum frame rate of image acquisition for analysis (correlation coefficient rho=0.9284 at 5s). TTP showed no significant differences between high- and low-grade stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Various clinical studies in the literature already demonstrated reproducible and reliable stenosis grading by analyzing TDCs acquired with color-coded fluoroscopy. In contrast to TTP, AUC values derived in ROIs behind the stenosis proved to be reliable parameters for stenosis grading. However, our results also demonstrate that several factors are able to significantly impact the evaluation of AUC values. More precisely, accuracy of acquired AUC values can be improved by choosing longer integration times, a large ROI size adapted to the vessel diameter, and a higher frame rate of image acquisition. Hindawi 2018-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6081527/ /pubmed/30140698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6180138 Text en Copyright © 2018 Patrick Ghibes et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ghibes, Patrick
Partovi, Sasan
Grözinger, Gerd
Martirosian, Petros
Schick, Fritz
Nikolaou, Konstantin
Ketelsen, Dominik
Syha, Roland
Grosse, Ulrich
Reliability and Accuracy of Peri-Interventional Stenosis Grading in Peripheral Artery Disease Using Color-Coded Quantitative Fluoroscopy: A Phantom Study Comparing a Clinical and Scientific Postprocessing Software
title Reliability and Accuracy of Peri-Interventional Stenosis Grading in Peripheral Artery Disease Using Color-Coded Quantitative Fluoroscopy: A Phantom Study Comparing a Clinical and Scientific Postprocessing Software
title_full Reliability and Accuracy of Peri-Interventional Stenosis Grading in Peripheral Artery Disease Using Color-Coded Quantitative Fluoroscopy: A Phantom Study Comparing a Clinical and Scientific Postprocessing Software
title_fullStr Reliability and Accuracy of Peri-Interventional Stenosis Grading in Peripheral Artery Disease Using Color-Coded Quantitative Fluoroscopy: A Phantom Study Comparing a Clinical and Scientific Postprocessing Software
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and Accuracy of Peri-Interventional Stenosis Grading in Peripheral Artery Disease Using Color-Coded Quantitative Fluoroscopy: A Phantom Study Comparing a Clinical and Scientific Postprocessing Software
title_short Reliability and Accuracy of Peri-Interventional Stenosis Grading in Peripheral Artery Disease Using Color-Coded Quantitative Fluoroscopy: A Phantom Study Comparing a Clinical and Scientific Postprocessing Software
title_sort reliability and accuracy of peri-interventional stenosis grading in peripheral artery disease using color-coded quantitative fluoroscopy: a phantom study comparing a clinical and scientific postprocessing software
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30140698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6180138
work_keys_str_mv AT ghibespatrick reliabilityandaccuracyofperiinterventionalstenosisgradinginperipheralarterydiseaseusingcolorcodedquantitativefluoroscopyaphantomstudycomparingaclinicalandscientificpostprocessingsoftware
AT partovisasan reliabilityandaccuracyofperiinterventionalstenosisgradinginperipheralarterydiseaseusingcolorcodedquantitativefluoroscopyaphantomstudycomparingaclinicalandscientificpostprocessingsoftware
AT grozingergerd reliabilityandaccuracyofperiinterventionalstenosisgradinginperipheralarterydiseaseusingcolorcodedquantitativefluoroscopyaphantomstudycomparingaclinicalandscientificpostprocessingsoftware
AT martirosianpetros reliabilityandaccuracyofperiinterventionalstenosisgradinginperipheralarterydiseaseusingcolorcodedquantitativefluoroscopyaphantomstudycomparingaclinicalandscientificpostprocessingsoftware
AT schickfritz reliabilityandaccuracyofperiinterventionalstenosisgradinginperipheralarterydiseaseusingcolorcodedquantitativefluoroscopyaphantomstudycomparingaclinicalandscientificpostprocessingsoftware
AT nikolaoukonstantin reliabilityandaccuracyofperiinterventionalstenosisgradinginperipheralarterydiseaseusingcolorcodedquantitativefluoroscopyaphantomstudycomparingaclinicalandscientificpostprocessingsoftware
AT ketelsendominik reliabilityandaccuracyofperiinterventionalstenosisgradinginperipheralarterydiseaseusingcolorcodedquantitativefluoroscopyaphantomstudycomparingaclinicalandscientificpostprocessingsoftware
AT syharoland reliabilityandaccuracyofperiinterventionalstenosisgradinginperipheralarterydiseaseusingcolorcodedquantitativefluoroscopyaphantomstudycomparingaclinicalandscientificpostprocessingsoftware
AT grosseulrich reliabilityandaccuracyofperiinterventionalstenosisgradinginperipheralarterydiseaseusingcolorcodedquantitativefluoroscopyaphantomstudycomparingaclinicalandscientificpostprocessingsoftware