Cargando…

PRIMO Monte Carlo software benchmarked against a reference dosimetry dataset for 6 MV photon beams from Varian linacs

BACKGROUND: The software PRIMO for the Monte Carlo simulation of radiotherapy linacs could potentially act as a independent calculation system to verify the calculations of treatment planning systems. We investigated the suitability of the PRIMO default beam parameters to produce accurate dosimetric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hermida–López, Marcelino, Sánchez–Artuñedo, David, Calvo–Ortega, Juan Francisco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30086767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1076-0
_version_ 1783345713021714432
author Hermida–López, Marcelino
Sánchez–Artuñedo, David
Calvo–Ortega, Juan Francisco
author_facet Hermida–López, Marcelino
Sánchez–Artuñedo, David
Calvo–Ortega, Juan Francisco
author_sort Hermida–López, Marcelino
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The software PRIMO for the Monte Carlo simulation of radiotherapy linacs could potentially act as a independent calculation system to verify the calculations of treatment planning systems. We investigated the suitability of the PRIMO default beam parameters to produce accurate dosimetric results for 6 MV photon beams from Varian Clinac 2100 linacs and 6 MV flattening–filter–free photon beams from Varian TrueBeam linacs. METHODS: Simulation results with the DPM algorithm were benchmarked against a published reference dosimetry dataset based on point measurements of 25 dosimetric parameters on a large series of linacs. Studied parameters (for several field sizes and depths) were: PDD, off–axis ratios, and output factors for open fields and IMRT/SBRT–style fields. For the latter, the output factors were also determined with radiochromic film and with a small–sized ionization chamber. Benchmark data, PRIMO simulation results and our experimental results were compared. RESULTS: PDD, off–axis ratios, and open–field output factors obtained from the simulations with the PRIMO default beam parameters agreed with the benchmark data within 2.4% for Clinac 2100, and within 1.3% for TrueBeam. Higher differences were found for IMRT/SBRT–style output factors: up to 2.8% for Clinac 2100, and up to 3.3% for TrueBeam. Experimental output factors agreed with benchmark data within 1.0% (ionization chamber) and within 1.9% (radiochromic film). CONCLUSIONS: PRIMO default initial beam parameters for 6 MV photon beams from Varian Clinac 2100 linacs and 6 MV FFF photon beams from Varian TrueBeam linacs allowed agreement within 3.3% with a dosimetry database based on measurements of a high number of linacs. This finding represents a first step in the validation of PRIMO for the independent verification of radiotherapy plans. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-018-1076-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6081807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60818072018-08-09 PRIMO Monte Carlo software benchmarked against a reference dosimetry dataset for 6 MV photon beams from Varian linacs Hermida–López, Marcelino Sánchez–Artuñedo, David Calvo–Ortega, Juan Francisco Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The software PRIMO for the Monte Carlo simulation of radiotherapy linacs could potentially act as a independent calculation system to verify the calculations of treatment planning systems. We investigated the suitability of the PRIMO default beam parameters to produce accurate dosimetric results for 6 MV photon beams from Varian Clinac 2100 linacs and 6 MV flattening–filter–free photon beams from Varian TrueBeam linacs. METHODS: Simulation results with the DPM algorithm were benchmarked against a published reference dosimetry dataset based on point measurements of 25 dosimetric parameters on a large series of linacs. Studied parameters (for several field sizes and depths) were: PDD, off–axis ratios, and output factors for open fields and IMRT/SBRT–style fields. For the latter, the output factors were also determined with radiochromic film and with a small–sized ionization chamber. Benchmark data, PRIMO simulation results and our experimental results were compared. RESULTS: PDD, off–axis ratios, and open–field output factors obtained from the simulations with the PRIMO default beam parameters agreed with the benchmark data within 2.4% for Clinac 2100, and within 1.3% for TrueBeam. Higher differences were found for IMRT/SBRT–style output factors: up to 2.8% for Clinac 2100, and up to 3.3% for TrueBeam. Experimental output factors agreed with benchmark data within 1.0% (ionization chamber) and within 1.9% (radiochromic film). CONCLUSIONS: PRIMO default initial beam parameters for 6 MV photon beams from Varian Clinac 2100 linacs and 6 MV FFF photon beams from Varian TrueBeam linacs allowed agreement within 3.3% with a dosimetry database based on measurements of a high number of linacs. This finding represents a first step in the validation of PRIMO for the independent verification of radiotherapy plans. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-018-1076-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6081807/ /pubmed/30086767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1076-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hermida–López, Marcelino
Sánchez–Artuñedo, David
Calvo–Ortega, Juan Francisco
PRIMO Monte Carlo software benchmarked against a reference dosimetry dataset for 6 MV photon beams from Varian linacs
title PRIMO Monte Carlo software benchmarked against a reference dosimetry dataset for 6 MV photon beams from Varian linacs
title_full PRIMO Monte Carlo software benchmarked against a reference dosimetry dataset for 6 MV photon beams from Varian linacs
title_fullStr PRIMO Monte Carlo software benchmarked against a reference dosimetry dataset for 6 MV photon beams from Varian linacs
title_full_unstemmed PRIMO Monte Carlo software benchmarked against a reference dosimetry dataset for 6 MV photon beams from Varian linacs
title_short PRIMO Monte Carlo software benchmarked against a reference dosimetry dataset for 6 MV photon beams from Varian linacs
title_sort primo monte carlo software benchmarked against a reference dosimetry dataset for 6 mv photon beams from varian linacs
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30086767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1076-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hermidalopezmarcelino primomontecarlosoftwarebenchmarkedagainstareferencedosimetrydatasetfor6mvphotonbeamsfromvarianlinacs
AT sanchezartunedodavid primomontecarlosoftwarebenchmarkedagainstareferencedosimetrydatasetfor6mvphotonbeamsfromvarianlinacs
AT calvoortegajuanfrancisco primomontecarlosoftwarebenchmarkedagainstareferencedosimetrydatasetfor6mvphotonbeamsfromvarianlinacs