Cargando…
Gene editing in the context of an increasingly complex genome
The reporting of the first draft of the human genome in 2000 brought with it much hope for the future in what was felt as a paradigm shift toward improved health outcomes. Indeed, we have now mapped the majority of variation across human populations with landmark projects such as 1000 Genomes; in ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30086710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4963-8 |
_version_ | 1783345725410639872 |
---|---|
author | Blighe, K. DeDionisio, L. Christie, K. A. Chawes, B. Shareef, S. Kakouli-Duarte, T. Chao-Shern, C. Harding, V. Kelly, R. S. Castellano, L. Stebbing, J. Lasky-Su, J. A. Nesbit, M. A. Moore, C. B. T. |
author_facet | Blighe, K. DeDionisio, L. Christie, K. A. Chawes, B. Shareef, S. Kakouli-Duarte, T. Chao-Shern, C. Harding, V. Kelly, R. S. Castellano, L. Stebbing, J. Lasky-Su, J. A. Nesbit, M. A. Moore, C. B. T. |
author_sort | Blighe, K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The reporting of the first draft of the human genome in 2000 brought with it much hope for the future in what was felt as a paradigm shift toward improved health outcomes. Indeed, we have now mapped the majority of variation across human populations with landmark projects such as 1000 Genomes; in cancer, we have catalogued mutations across the primary carcinomas; whilst, for other diseases, we have identified the genetic variants with strongest association. Despite this, we are still awaiting the genetic revolution in healthcare to materialise and translate itself into the health benefits for which we had hoped. A major problem we face relates to our underestimation of the complexity of the genome, and that of biological mechanisms, generally. Fixation on DNA sequence alone and a ‘rigid’ mode of thinking about the genome has meant that the folding and structure of the DNA molecule —and how these relate to regulation— have been underappreciated. Projects like ENCODE have additionally taught us that regulation at the level of RNA is just as important as that at the spatiotemporal level of chromatin. In this review, we chart the course of the major advances in the biomedical sciences in the era pre- and post the release of the first draft sequence of the human genome, taking a focus on technology and how its development has influenced these. We additionally focus on gene editing via CRISPR/Cas9 as a key technique, in particular its use in the context of complex biological mechanisms. Our aim is to shift the mode of thinking about the genome to that which encompasses a greater appreciation of the folding of the DNA molecule, DNA- RNA/protein interactions, and how these regulate expression and elaborate disease mechanisms. Through the composition of our work, we recognise that technological improvement is conducive to a greater understanding of biological processes and life within the cell. We believe we now have the technology at our disposal that permits a better understanding of disease mechanisms, achievable through integrative data analyses. Finally, only with greater understanding of disease mechanisms can techniques such as gene editing be faithfully conducted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6081867 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60818672018-08-10 Gene editing in the context of an increasingly complex genome Blighe, K. DeDionisio, L. Christie, K. A. Chawes, B. Shareef, S. Kakouli-Duarte, T. Chao-Shern, C. Harding, V. Kelly, R. S. Castellano, L. Stebbing, J. Lasky-Su, J. A. Nesbit, M. A. Moore, C. B. T. BMC Genomics Review The reporting of the first draft of the human genome in 2000 brought with it much hope for the future in what was felt as a paradigm shift toward improved health outcomes. Indeed, we have now mapped the majority of variation across human populations with landmark projects such as 1000 Genomes; in cancer, we have catalogued mutations across the primary carcinomas; whilst, for other diseases, we have identified the genetic variants with strongest association. Despite this, we are still awaiting the genetic revolution in healthcare to materialise and translate itself into the health benefits for which we had hoped. A major problem we face relates to our underestimation of the complexity of the genome, and that of biological mechanisms, generally. Fixation on DNA sequence alone and a ‘rigid’ mode of thinking about the genome has meant that the folding and structure of the DNA molecule —and how these relate to regulation— have been underappreciated. Projects like ENCODE have additionally taught us that regulation at the level of RNA is just as important as that at the spatiotemporal level of chromatin. In this review, we chart the course of the major advances in the biomedical sciences in the era pre- and post the release of the first draft sequence of the human genome, taking a focus on technology and how its development has influenced these. We additionally focus on gene editing via CRISPR/Cas9 as a key technique, in particular its use in the context of complex biological mechanisms. Our aim is to shift the mode of thinking about the genome to that which encompasses a greater appreciation of the folding of the DNA molecule, DNA- RNA/protein interactions, and how these regulate expression and elaborate disease mechanisms. Through the composition of our work, we recognise that technological improvement is conducive to a greater understanding of biological processes and life within the cell. We believe we now have the technology at our disposal that permits a better understanding of disease mechanisms, achievable through integrative data analyses. Finally, only with greater understanding of disease mechanisms can techniques such as gene editing be faithfully conducted. BioMed Central 2018-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6081867/ /pubmed/30086710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4963-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Blighe, K. DeDionisio, L. Christie, K. A. Chawes, B. Shareef, S. Kakouli-Duarte, T. Chao-Shern, C. Harding, V. Kelly, R. S. Castellano, L. Stebbing, J. Lasky-Su, J. A. Nesbit, M. A. Moore, C. B. T. Gene editing in the context of an increasingly complex genome |
title | Gene editing in the context of an increasingly complex genome |
title_full | Gene editing in the context of an increasingly complex genome |
title_fullStr | Gene editing in the context of an increasingly complex genome |
title_full_unstemmed | Gene editing in the context of an increasingly complex genome |
title_short | Gene editing in the context of an increasingly complex genome |
title_sort | gene editing in the context of an increasingly complex genome |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30086710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4963-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blighek geneeditinginthecontextofanincreasinglycomplexgenome AT dedionisiol geneeditinginthecontextofanincreasinglycomplexgenome AT christieka geneeditinginthecontextofanincreasinglycomplexgenome AT chawesb geneeditinginthecontextofanincreasinglycomplexgenome AT shareefs geneeditinginthecontextofanincreasinglycomplexgenome AT kakouliduartet geneeditinginthecontextofanincreasinglycomplexgenome AT chaoshernc geneeditinginthecontextofanincreasinglycomplexgenome AT hardingv geneeditinginthecontextofanincreasinglycomplexgenome AT kellyrs geneeditinginthecontextofanincreasinglycomplexgenome AT castellanol geneeditinginthecontextofanincreasinglycomplexgenome AT stebbingj geneeditinginthecontextofanincreasinglycomplexgenome AT laskysuja geneeditinginthecontextofanincreasinglycomplexgenome AT nesbitma geneeditinginthecontextofanincreasinglycomplexgenome AT moorecbt geneeditinginthecontextofanincreasinglycomplexgenome |