Cargando…

Influencing factors of pregnancy loss and survival probability of clinical pregnancies conceived through assisted reproductive technology

BACKGROUND: Pregnancies following assisted reproductive technology (ART) may have elevated potential risk of pregnancy loss (PL) when compared to natural conception. However, rare studies comprehensively analyzed the IVF/ICSI cycle-dependent factors for loss of clinical pregnancy. Therefore, we aime...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Lingmin, Du, Jiangbo, Lv, Hong, Zhao, Jing, Chen, Mengxi, Wang, Yifeng, Wu, Fang, Liu, Feng, Chen, Xiaojiao, Zhang, Junqiang, Ma, Hongxia, Jin, Guangfu, Shen, Hongbing, Chen, Li, Ling, Xiufeng, Hu, Zhibin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30086781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0390-6
_version_ 1783345729884913664
author Hu, Lingmin
Du, Jiangbo
Lv, Hong
Zhao, Jing
Chen, Mengxi
Wang, Yifeng
Wu, Fang
Liu, Feng
Chen, Xiaojiao
Zhang, Junqiang
Ma, Hongxia
Jin, Guangfu
Shen, Hongbing
Chen, Li
Ling, Xiufeng
Hu, Zhibin
author_facet Hu, Lingmin
Du, Jiangbo
Lv, Hong
Zhao, Jing
Chen, Mengxi
Wang, Yifeng
Wu, Fang
Liu, Feng
Chen, Xiaojiao
Zhang, Junqiang
Ma, Hongxia
Jin, Guangfu
Shen, Hongbing
Chen, Li
Ling, Xiufeng
Hu, Zhibin
author_sort Hu, Lingmin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pregnancies following assisted reproductive technology (ART) may have elevated potential risk of pregnancy loss (PL) when compared to natural conception. However, rare studies comprehensively analyzed the IVF/ICSI cycle-dependent factors for loss of clinical pregnancy. Therefore, we aimed to determine the ART subgroup-specific risks of PL throughout pregnancy and explore different risk factors for early miscarriage and late miscarriage among pregnancies conceived through ART. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was launched in two infertility treatment centers in Nanjing and Changzhou including 5485 IVF/ICSI embryo transfer cycles with known outcomes after clinical pregnancy by the end of 2015. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to estimate the hazard ratios and their 95% confidence intervals. The associations between survival time during pregnancy and demographics and clinical characteristics of clinical pregnancies were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-rank test. RESULTS: The overall PL rate in current ART population was 12.5%. Among the 685 pregnancy loss cycles, a total of 460 ended as early miscarriage, 191 as late miscarriage. We found couples in ART pregnancies demonstrated a significantly increased risk of PL as maternal age (HR = 1.31, P(trend) < 0.001) grows. Pregnancies received controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocol like GnRH antagonist protocol (HR = 3.49, P < 0.001) and minimal stimulation protocol (HR = 1.83, P < 0.001) had higher risk of PL than GnRH-a long protocol. Notably, in contrast to fresh cycle, women who received frozen cycle embryo had a significant increased risk of early miscarriage (P < 0.001), while frozen cycle was linked with lower risk of late miscarriage (P = 0.045). In addition, four factors (maternal age, COH protocol, cycle type and serum hCG level 14 days after transfer) had independent impact on miscarriage mainly before 12 weeks of gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: With these findings in this study, clinicians may make it better to evaluate a patient’s risk of PL based on the maternal age at the time of treatment, COH protocol, cycle type and serum hCG level 14 days after transfer and the gestational week of the fetus, and we hope that it contributes to future study on its etiology and guide the clinical prevention and treatment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12958-018-0390-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6081896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60818962018-08-10 Influencing factors of pregnancy loss and survival probability of clinical pregnancies conceived through assisted reproductive technology Hu, Lingmin Du, Jiangbo Lv, Hong Zhao, Jing Chen, Mengxi Wang, Yifeng Wu, Fang Liu, Feng Chen, Xiaojiao Zhang, Junqiang Ma, Hongxia Jin, Guangfu Shen, Hongbing Chen, Li Ling, Xiufeng Hu, Zhibin Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Pregnancies following assisted reproductive technology (ART) may have elevated potential risk of pregnancy loss (PL) when compared to natural conception. However, rare studies comprehensively analyzed the IVF/ICSI cycle-dependent factors for loss of clinical pregnancy. Therefore, we aimed to determine the ART subgroup-specific risks of PL throughout pregnancy and explore different risk factors for early miscarriage and late miscarriage among pregnancies conceived through ART. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was launched in two infertility treatment centers in Nanjing and Changzhou including 5485 IVF/ICSI embryo transfer cycles with known outcomes after clinical pregnancy by the end of 2015. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to estimate the hazard ratios and their 95% confidence intervals. The associations between survival time during pregnancy and demographics and clinical characteristics of clinical pregnancies were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-rank test. RESULTS: The overall PL rate in current ART population was 12.5%. Among the 685 pregnancy loss cycles, a total of 460 ended as early miscarriage, 191 as late miscarriage. We found couples in ART pregnancies demonstrated a significantly increased risk of PL as maternal age (HR = 1.31, P(trend) < 0.001) grows. Pregnancies received controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocol like GnRH antagonist protocol (HR = 3.49, P < 0.001) and minimal stimulation protocol (HR = 1.83, P < 0.001) had higher risk of PL than GnRH-a long protocol. Notably, in contrast to fresh cycle, women who received frozen cycle embryo had a significant increased risk of early miscarriage (P < 0.001), while frozen cycle was linked with lower risk of late miscarriage (P = 0.045). In addition, four factors (maternal age, COH protocol, cycle type and serum hCG level 14 days after transfer) had independent impact on miscarriage mainly before 12 weeks of gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: With these findings in this study, clinicians may make it better to evaluate a patient’s risk of PL based on the maternal age at the time of treatment, COH protocol, cycle type and serum hCG level 14 days after transfer and the gestational week of the fetus, and we hope that it contributes to future study on its etiology and guide the clinical prevention and treatment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12958-018-0390-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6081896/ /pubmed/30086781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0390-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hu, Lingmin
Du, Jiangbo
Lv, Hong
Zhao, Jing
Chen, Mengxi
Wang, Yifeng
Wu, Fang
Liu, Feng
Chen, Xiaojiao
Zhang, Junqiang
Ma, Hongxia
Jin, Guangfu
Shen, Hongbing
Chen, Li
Ling, Xiufeng
Hu, Zhibin
Influencing factors of pregnancy loss and survival probability of clinical pregnancies conceived through assisted reproductive technology
title Influencing factors of pregnancy loss and survival probability of clinical pregnancies conceived through assisted reproductive technology
title_full Influencing factors of pregnancy loss and survival probability of clinical pregnancies conceived through assisted reproductive technology
title_fullStr Influencing factors of pregnancy loss and survival probability of clinical pregnancies conceived through assisted reproductive technology
title_full_unstemmed Influencing factors of pregnancy loss and survival probability of clinical pregnancies conceived through assisted reproductive technology
title_short Influencing factors of pregnancy loss and survival probability of clinical pregnancies conceived through assisted reproductive technology
title_sort influencing factors of pregnancy loss and survival probability of clinical pregnancies conceived through assisted reproductive technology
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30086781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0390-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hulingmin influencingfactorsofpregnancylossandsurvivalprobabilityofclinicalpregnanciesconceivedthroughassistedreproductivetechnology
AT dujiangbo influencingfactorsofpregnancylossandsurvivalprobabilityofclinicalpregnanciesconceivedthroughassistedreproductivetechnology
AT lvhong influencingfactorsofpregnancylossandsurvivalprobabilityofclinicalpregnanciesconceivedthroughassistedreproductivetechnology
AT zhaojing influencingfactorsofpregnancylossandsurvivalprobabilityofclinicalpregnanciesconceivedthroughassistedreproductivetechnology
AT chenmengxi influencingfactorsofpregnancylossandsurvivalprobabilityofclinicalpregnanciesconceivedthroughassistedreproductivetechnology
AT wangyifeng influencingfactorsofpregnancylossandsurvivalprobabilityofclinicalpregnanciesconceivedthroughassistedreproductivetechnology
AT wufang influencingfactorsofpregnancylossandsurvivalprobabilityofclinicalpregnanciesconceivedthroughassistedreproductivetechnology
AT liufeng influencingfactorsofpregnancylossandsurvivalprobabilityofclinicalpregnanciesconceivedthroughassistedreproductivetechnology
AT chenxiaojiao influencingfactorsofpregnancylossandsurvivalprobabilityofclinicalpregnanciesconceivedthroughassistedreproductivetechnology
AT zhangjunqiang influencingfactorsofpregnancylossandsurvivalprobabilityofclinicalpregnanciesconceivedthroughassistedreproductivetechnology
AT mahongxia influencingfactorsofpregnancylossandsurvivalprobabilityofclinicalpregnanciesconceivedthroughassistedreproductivetechnology
AT jinguangfu influencingfactorsofpregnancylossandsurvivalprobabilityofclinicalpregnanciesconceivedthroughassistedreproductivetechnology
AT shenhongbing influencingfactorsofpregnancylossandsurvivalprobabilityofclinicalpregnanciesconceivedthroughassistedreproductivetechnology
AT chenli influencingfactorsofpregnancylossandsurvivalprobabilityofclinicalpregnanciesconceivedthroughassistedreproductivetechnology
AT lingxiufeng influencingfactorsofpregnancylossandsurvivalprobabilityofclinicalpregnanciesconceivedthroughassistedreproductivetechnology
AT huzhibin influencingfactorsofpregnancylossandsurvivalprobabilityofclinicalpregnanciesconceivedthroughassistedreproductivetechnology