Cargando…

The ICR639 CPG NGS validation series: A resource to assess analytical sensitivity of cancer predisposition gene testing

The analytical sensitivity of a next generation sequencing (NGS) test reflects the ability of the test to detect real sequence variation. The evaluation of analytical sensitivity relies on the availability of gold-standard, validated, benchmarking datasets. For NGS analysis the availability of suita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahamdallie, Shazia, Ruark, Elise, Holt, Esty, Poyastro-Pearson, Emma, Renwick, Anthony, Strydom, Ann, Seal, Sheila, Rahman, Nazneen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30175241
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14594.1
_version_ 1783345740639109120
author Mahamdallie, Shazia
Ruark, Elise
Holt, Esty
Poyastro-Pearson, Emma
Renwick, Anthony
Strydom, Ann
Seal, Sheila
Rahman, Nazneen
author_facet Mahamdallie, Shazia
Ruark, Elise
Holt, Esty
Poyastro-Pearson, Emma
Renwick, Anthony
Strydom, Ann
Seal, Sheila
Rahman, Nazneen
author_sort Mahamdallie, Shazia
collection PubMed
description The analytical sensitivity of a next generation sequencing (NGS) test reflects the ability of the test to detect real sequence variation. The evaluation of analytical sensitivity relies on the availability of gold-standard, validated, benchmarking datasets. For NGS analysis the availability of suitable datasets has been limited. Most laboratories undertake small scale evaluations using in-house data, and/or rely on in silico generated datasets to evaluate the performance of NGS variant detection pipelines. Cancer predisposition genes (CPGs), such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, are amongst the most widely tested genes in clinical practice today. Hundreds of providers across the world are now offering CPG testing using NGS methods. Validating and comparing the analytical sensitivity of CPG tests has proved difficult, due to the absence of comprehensive, orthogonally validated, benchmarking datasets of CPG pathogenic variants. To address this we present the ICR639 CPG NGS validation series. This dataset comprises data from 639 individuals. Each individual has sequencing data generated using the TruSight Cancer Panel (TSCP), a targeted NGS assay for the analysis of CPGs, together with orthogonally generated data showing the presence of at least one CPG pathogenic variant per individual. The set consists of 645 pathogenic variants in total. There is strong representation of the most challenging types of variants to detect, with 339 indels, including 16 complex indels and 24 with length greater than five base pairs and 74 exon copy number variations (CNVs) including 23 single exon CNVs. The series includes pathogenic variants in 31 CPGs, including 502 pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2, making this an important comprehensive validation dataset for providers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 NGS testing. We have deposited the TSCP FASTQ files of the ICR639 series in the European Genome-phenome Archive (EGA) under accession number EGAD00001004134.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6081973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60819732018-08-31 The ICR639 CPG NGS validation series: A resource to assess analytical sensitivity of cancer predisposition gene testing Mahamdallie, Shazia Ruark, Elise Holt, Esty Poyastro-Pearson, Emma Renwick, Anthony Strydom, Ann Seal, Sheila Rahman, Nazneen Wellcome Open Res Data Note The analytical sensitivity of a next generation sequencing (NGS) test reflects the ability of the test to detect real sequence variation. The evaluation of analytical sensitivity relies on the availability of gold-standard, validated, benchmarking datasets. For NGS analysis the availability of suitable datasets has been limited. Most laboratories undertake small scale evaluations using in-house data, and/or rely on in silico generated datasets to evaluate the performance of NGS variant detection pipelines. Cancer predisposition genes (CPGs), such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, are amongst the most widely tested genes in clinical practice today. Hundreds of providers across the world are now offering CPG testing using NGS methods. Validating and comparing the analytical sensitivity of CPG tests has proved difficult, due to the absence of comprehensive, orthogonally validated, benchmarking datasets of CPG pathogenic variants. To address this we present the ICR639 CPG NGS validation series. This dataset comprises data from 639 individuals. Each individual has sequencing data generated using the TruSight Cancer Panel (TSCP), a targeted NGS assay for the analysis of CPGs, together with orthogonally generated data showing the presence of at least one CPG pathogenic variant per individual. The set consists of 645 pathogenic variants in total. There is strong representation of the most challenging types of variants to detect, with 339 indels, including 16 complex indels and 24 with length greater than five base pairs and 74 exon copy number variations (CNVs) including 23 single exon CNVs. The series includes pathogenic variants in 31 CPGs, including 502 pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2, making this an important comprehensive validation dataset for providers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 NGS testing. We have deposited the TSCP FASTQ files of the ICR639 series in the European Genome-phenome Archive (EGA) under accession number EGAD00001004134. F1000 Research Limited 2018-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6081973/ /pubmed/30175241 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14594.1 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Mahamdallie S et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Data Note
Mahamdallie, Shazia
Ruark, Elise
Holt, Esty
Poyastro-Pearson, Emma
Renwick, Anthony
Strydom, Ann
Seal, Sheila
Rahman, Nazneen
The ICR639 CPG NGS validation series: A resource to assess analytical sensitivity of cancer predisposition gene testing
title The ICR639 CPG NGS validation series: A resource to assess analytical sensitivity of cancer predisposition gene testing
title_full The ICR639 CPG NGS validation series: A resource to assess analytical sensitivity of cancer predisposition gene testing
title_fullStr The ICR639 CPG NGS validation series: A resource to assess analytical sensitivity of cancer predisposition gene testing
title_full_unstemmed The ICR639 CPG NGS validation series: A resource to assess analytical sensitivity of cancer predisposition gene testing
title_short The ICR639 CPG NGS validation series: A resource to assess analytical sensitivity of cancer predisposition gene testing
title_sort icr639 cpg ngs validation series: a resource to assess analytical sensitivity of cancer predisposition gene testing
topic Data Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6081973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30175241
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14594.1
work_keys_str_mv AT mahamdallieshazia theicr639cpgngsvalidationseriesaresourcetoassessanalyticalsensitivityofcancerpredispositiongenetesting
AT ruarkelise theicr639cpgngsvalidationseriesaresourcetoassessanalyticalsensitivityofcancerpredispositiongenetesting
AT holtesty theicr639cpgngsvalidationseriesaresourcetoassessanalyticalsensitivityofcancerpredispositiongenetesting
AT poyastropearsonemma theicr639cpgngsvalidationseriesaresourcetoassessanalyticalsensitivityofcancerpredispositiongenetesting
AT renwickanthony theicr639cpgngsvalidationseriesaresourcetoassessanalyticalsensitivityofcancerpredispositiongenetesting
AT strydomann theicr639cpgngsvalidationseriesaresourcetoassessanalyticalsensitivityofcancerpredispositiongenetesting
AT sealsheila theicr639cpgngsvalidationseriesaresourcetoassessanalyticalsensitivityofcancerpredispositiongenetesting
AT rahmannazneen theicr639cpgngsvalidationseriesaresourcetoassessanalyticalsensitivityofcancerpredispositiongenetesting
AT mahamdallieshazia icr639cpgngsvalidationseriesaresourcetoassessanalyticalsensitivityofcancerpredispositiongenetesting
AT ruarkelise icr639cpgngsvalidationseriesaresourcetoassessanalyticalsensitivityofcancerpredispositiongenetesting
AT holtesty icr639cpgngsvalidationseriesaresourcetoassessanalyticalsensitivityofcancerpredispositiongenetesting
AT poyastropearsonemma icr639cpgngsvalidationseriesaresourcetoassessanalyticalsensitivityofcancerpredispositiongenetesting
AT renwickanthony icr639cpgngsvalidationseriesaresourcetoassessanalyticalsensitivityofcancerpredispositiongenetesting
AT strydomann icr639cpgngsvalidationseriesaresourcetoassessanalyticalsensitivityofcancerpredispositiongenetesting
AT sealsheila icr639cpgngsvalidationseriesaresourcetoassessanalyticalsensitivityofcancerpredispositiongenetesting
AT rahmannazneen icr639cpgngsvalidationseriesaresourcetoassessanalyticalsensitivityofcancerpredispositiongenetesting