Cargando…

Rabies Virus Antibodies from Oral Vaccination as a Correlate of Protection against Lethal Infection in Wildlife

Both cell-mediated and humoral immune effectors are important in combating rabies infection, although the humoral response receives greater attention regarding rabies prevention. The principle of preventive vaccination has been adopted for strategies of oral rabies vaccination (ORV) of wildlife rese...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Susan M., Gilbert, Amy, Vos, Ad, Freuling, Conrad M., Ellis, Christine, Kliemt, Jeannette, Müller, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6082110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30270888
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed2030031
_version_ 1783345767135576064
author Moore, Susan M.
Gilbert, Amy
Vos, Ad
Freuling, Conrad M.
Ellis, Christine
Kliemt, Jeannette
Müller, Thomas
author_facet Moore, Susan M.
Gilbert, Amy
Vos, Ad
Freuling, Conrad M.
Ellis, Christine
Kliemt, Jeannette
Müller, Thomas
author_sort Moore, Susan M.
collection PubMed
description Both cell-mediated and humoral immune effectors are important in combating rabies infection, although the humoral response receives greater attention regarding rabies prevention. The principle of preventive vaccination has been adopted for strategies of oral rabies vaccination (ORV) of wildlife reservoir populations for decades to control circulation of rabies virus in free-ranging hosts. There remains much debate about the levels of rabies antibodies (and the assays to measure them) that confer resistance to rabies virus. In this paper, data from published literature and our own unpublished animal studies on the induction of rabies binding and neutralizing antibodies following oral immunization of animals with live attenuated or recombinant rabies vaccines, are examined as correlates of protection against lethal rabies infection in captive challenge settings. Analysis of our studies suggests that, though serum neutralization test results are expected to reflect in vivo protection, the blocking enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) result at Day 28 was a better predictor of survival. ELISA kits may have an advantage of greater precision and ability to compare results among different studies and laboratories based on the inherent standardization of the kit format. This paper examines current knowledge and study findings to guide meaningful interpretation of serology results in oral baiting monitoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6082110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60821102018-09-24 Rabies Virus Antibodies from Oral Vaccination as a Correlate of Protection against Lethal Infection in Wildlife Moore, Susan M. Gilbert, Amy Vos, Ad Freuling, Conrad M. Ellis, Christine Kliemt, Jeannette Müller, Thomas Trop Med Infect Dis Article Both cell-mediated and humoral immune effectors are important in combating rabies infection, although the humoral response receives greater attention regarding rabies prevention. The principle of preventive vaccination has been adopted for strategies of oral rabies vaccination (ORV) of wildlife reservoir populations for decades to control circulation of rabies virus in free-ranging hosts. There remains much debate about the levels of rabies antibodies (and the assays to measure them) that confer resistance to rabies virus. In this paper, data from published literature and our own unpublished animal studies on the induction of rabies binding and neutralizing antibodies following oral immunization of animals with live attenuated or recombinant rabies vaccines, are examined as correlates of protection against lethal rabies infection in captive challenge settings. Analysis of our studies suggests that, though serum neutralization test results are expected to reflect in vivo protection, the blocking enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) result at Day 28 was a better predictor of survival. ELISA kits may have an advantage of greater precision and ability to compare results among different studies and laboratories based on the inherent standardization of the kit format. This paper examines current knowledge and study findings to guide meaningful interpretation of serology results in oral baiting monitoring. MDPI 2017-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6082110/ /pubmed/30270888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed2030031 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Moore, Susan M.
Gilbert, Amy
Vos, Ad
Freuling, Conrad M.
Ellis, Christine
Kliemt, Jeannette
Müller, Thomas
Rabies Virus Antibodies from Oral Vaccination as a Correlate of Protection against Lethal Infection in Wildlife
title Rabies Virus Antibodies from Oral Vaccination as a Correlate of Protection against Lethal Infection in Wildlife
title_full Rabies Virus Antibodies from Oral Vaccination as a Correlate of Protection against Lethal Infection in Wildlife
title_fullStr Rabies Virus Antibodies from Oral Vaccination as a Correlate of Protection against Lethal Infection in Wildlife
title_full_unstemmed Rabies Virus Antibodies from Oral Vaccination as a Correlate of Protection against Lethal Infection in Wildlife
title_short Rabies Virus Antibodies from Oral Vaccination as a Correlate of Protection against Lethal Infection in Wildlife
title_sort rabies virus antibodies from oral vaccination as a correlate of protection against lethal infection in wildlife
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6082110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30270888
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed2030031
work_keys_str_mv AT mooresusanm rabiesvirusantibodiesfromoralvaccinationasacorrelateofprotectionagainstlethalinfectioninwildlife
AT gilbertamy rabiesvirusantibodiesfromoralvaccinationasacorrelateofprotectionagainstlethalinfectioninwildlife
AT vosad rabiesvirusantibodiesfromoralvaccinationasacorrelateofprotectionagainstlethalinfectioninwildlife
AT freulingconradm rabiesvirusantibodiesfromoralvaccinationasacorrelateofprotectionagainstlethalinfectioninwildlife
AT ellischristine rabiesvirusantibodiesfromoralvaccinationasacorrelateofprotectionagainstlethalinfectioninwildlife
AT kliemtjeannette rabiesvirusantibodiesfromoralvaccinationasacorrelateofprotectionagainstlethalinfectioninwildlife
AT mullerthomas rabiesvirusantibodiesfromoralvaccinationasacorrelateofprotectionagainstlethalinfectioninwildlife