Cargando…

Randomised controlled feasibility trial of real versus sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in adults with severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: the TIARA study

OBJECTIVE: Treatment options for severe, enduring anorexia nervosa (SE-AN) are limited. Non-invasive neuromodulation is a promising emerging intervention. Our study is a feasibility randomised controlled trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in individuals with SE-AN, which ai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dalton, Bethan, Bartholdy, Savani, McClelland, Jessica, Kekic, Maria, Rennalls, Samantha J, Werthmann, Jessica, Carter, Ben, O’Daly, Owen G, Campbell, Iain C, David, Anthony S, Glennon, Danielle, Kern, Nikola, Schmidt, Ulrike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6082449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30012789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021531
_version_ 1783345797284233216
author Dalton, Bethan
Bartholdy, Savani
McClelland, Jessica
Kekic, Maria
Rennalls, Samantha J
Werthmann, Jessica
Carter, Ben
O’Daly, Owen G
Campbell, Iain C
David, Anthony S
Glennon, Danielle
Kern, Nikola
Schmidt, Ulrike
author_facet Dalton, Bethan
Bartholdy, Savani
McClelland, Jessica
Kekic, Maria
Rennalls, Samantha J
Werthmann, Jessica
Carter, Ben
O’Daly, Owen G
Campbell, Iain C
David, Anthony S
Glennon, Danielle
Kern, Nikola
Schmidt, Ulrike
author_sort Dalton, Bethan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Treatment options for severe, enduring anorexia nervosa (SE-AN) are limited. Non-invasive neuromodulation is a promising emerging intervention. Our study is a feasibility randomised controlled trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in individuals with SE-AN, which aims to inform the design of a future large-scale trial. DESIGN: Double-blind, parallel group, two-arm, sham-controlled trial. SETTING: Specialist eating disorders centre. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling people with anorexia nervosa, an illness duration of ≥3 years and at least one previous completed treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Participants received 20 sessions (administered over 4 weeks) of MRI-guided real or sham high-frequency rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in addition to treatment-as-usual. OUTCOMES: Primary outcomes were recruitment, attendance and retention rates. Secondary outcomes included body mass index (BMI), eating disorder symptoms, mood, quality of life and rTMS safety and tolerability. Assessments were conducted at baseline, post-treatment and follow-up (ie, at 0 month, 1 month and 4 months post-randomisation). RESULTS: Thirty-four participants (17 per group) were randomly allocated to real or sham rTMS. One participant per group was withdrawn prior to the intervention due to safety concerns. Two participants (both receiving sham) did not complete the treatment. rTMS was safe and well tolerated. Between-group effect sizes of change scores (baseline to follow-up) were small for BMI (d=0.2, 95% CI −0.49 to 0.90) and eating disorder symptoms (d=0.1, 95% CI −0.60 to 0.79), medium for quality of life and moderate to large (d=0.61 to 1.0) for mood outcomes, all favouring rTMS over sham. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment protocol is feasible and acceptable to participants. Outcomes provide preliminary evidence for the therapeutic potential of rTMS in SE-AN. Largest effects were observed on variables assessing mood. This study supports the need for a larger confirmatory trial to evaluate the effectiveness of multi-session rTMS in SE-AN. Future studies should include a longer follow-up period and an assessment of cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14329415; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6082449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60824492018-08-10 Randomised controlled feasibility trial of real versus sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in adults with severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: the TIARA study Dalton, Bethan Bartholdy, Savani McClelland, Jessica Kekic, Maria Rennalls, Samantha J Werthmann, Jessica Carter, Ben O’Daly, Owen G Campbell, Iain C David, Anthony S Glennon, Danielle Kern, Nikola Schmidt, Ulrike BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVE: Treatment options for severe, enduring anorexia nervosa (SE-AN) are limited. Non-invasive neuromodulation is a promising emerging intervention. Our study is a feasibility randomised controlled trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in individuals with SE-AN, which aims to inform the design of a future large-scale trial. DESIGN: Double-blind, parallel group, two-arm, sham-controlled trial. SETTING: Specialist eating disorders centre. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling people with anorexia nervosa, an illness duration of ≥3 years and at least one previous completed treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Participants received 20 sessions (administered over 4 weeks) of MRI-guided real or sham high-frequency rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in addition to treatment-as-usual. OUTCOMES: Primary outcomes were recruitment, attendance and retention rates. Secondary outcomes included body mass index (BMI), eating disorder symptoms, mood, quality of life and rTMS safety and tolerability. Assessments were conducted at baseline, post-treatment and follow-up (ie, at 0 month, 1 month and 4 months post-randomisation). RESULTS: Thirty-four participants (17 per group) were randomly allocated to real or sham rTMS. One participant per group was withdrawn prior to the intervention due to safety concerns. Two participants (both receiving sham) did not complete the treatment. rTMS was safe and well tolerated. Between-group effect sizes of change scores (baseline to follow-up) were small for BMI (d=0.2, 95% CI −0.49 to 0.90) and eating disorder symptoms (d=0.1, 95% CI −0.60 to 0.79), medium for quality of life and moderate to large (d=0.61 to 1.0) for mood outcomes, all favouring rTMS over sham. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment protocol is feasible and acceptable to participants. Outcomes provide preliminary evidence for the therapeutic potential of rTMS in SE-AN. Largest effects were observed on variables assessing mood. This study supports the need for a larger confirmatory trial to evaluate the effectiveness of multi-session rTMS in SE-AN. Future studies should include a longer follow-up period and an assessment of cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14329415; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6082449/ /pubmed/30012789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021531 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Mental Health
Dalton, Bethan
Bartholdy, Savani
McClelland, Jessica
Kekic, Maria
Rennalls, Samantha J
Werthmann, Jessica
Carter, Ben
O’Daly, Owen G
Campbell, Iain C
David, Anthony S
Glennon, Danielle
Kern, Nikola
Schmidt, Ulrike
Randomised controlled feasibility trial of real versus sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in adults with severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: the TIARA study
title Randomised controlled feasibility trial of real versus sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in adults with severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: the TIARA study
title_full Randomised controlled feasibility trial of real versus sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in adults with severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: the TIARA study
title_fullStr Randomised controlled feasibility trial of real versus sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in adults with severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: the TIARA study
title_full_unstemmed Randomised controlled feasibility trial of real versus sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in adults with severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: the TIARA study
title_short Randomised controlled feasibility trial of real versus sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in adults with severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: the TIARA study
title_sort randomised controlled feasibility trial of real versus sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in adults with severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: the tiara study
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6082449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30012789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021531
work_keys_str_mv AT daltonbethan randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofrealversusshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentinadultswithsevereandenduringanorexianervosathetiarastudy
AT bartholdysavani randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofrealversusshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentinadultswithsevereandenduringanorexianervosathetiarastudy
AT mcclellandjessica randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofrealversusshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentinadultswithsevereandenduringanorexianervosathetiarastudy
AT kekicmaria randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofrealversusshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentinadultswithsevereandenduringanorexianervosathetiarastudy
AT rennallssamanthaj randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofrealversusshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentinadultswithsevereandenduringanorexianervosathetiarastudy
AT werthmannjessica randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofrealversusshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentinadultswithsevereandenduringanorexianervosathetiarastudy
AT carterben randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofrealversusshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentinadultswithsevereandenduringanorexianervosathetiarastudy
AT odalyoweng randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofrealversusshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentinadultswithsevereandenduringanorexianervosathetiarastudy
AT campbelliainc randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofrealversusshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentinadultswithsevereandenduringanorexianervosathetiarastudy
AT davidanthonys randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofrealversusshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentinadultswithsevereandenduringanorexianervosathetiarastudy
AT glennondanielle randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofrealversusshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentinadultswithsevereandenduringanorexianervosathetiarastudy
AT kernnikola randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofrealversusshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentinadultswithsevereandenduringanorexianervosathetiarastudy
AT schmidtulrike randomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialofrealversusshamrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentinadultswithsevereandenduringanorexianervosathetiarastudy