Cargando…

Organisational interventions designed to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION: There is a growing body of evidence to indicate that both primary and subsequent caesarean sections are associated with increased maternal and perinatal morbidity. Efforts to reduce the number of clinically unnecessary caesarean sections are urgently required. Our objective is to syste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hutchinson, Alison M, Nagle, Cate, Kent, Bridie, Bick, Debra, Lindberg, Rebecca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6082465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30002008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021120
_version_ 1783345801046523904
author Hutchinson, Alison M
Nagle, Cate
Kent, Bridie
Bick, Debra
Lindberg, Rebecca
author_facet Hutchinson, Alison M
Nagle, Cate
Kent, Bridie
Bick, Debra
Lindberg, Rebecca
author_sort Hutchinson, Alison M
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There is a growing body of evidence to indicate that both primary and subsequent caesarean sections are associated with increased maternal and perinatal morbidity. Efforts to reduce the number of clinically unnecessary caesarean sections are urgently required. Our objective is to systematically review published evidence on the effectiveness of maternity service organisational interventions, such as models of maternity care, that aim to reduce caesarean section rates. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Databases will be searched, including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, MEDLINE, Maternity and Infant Care, EMBASE and SCOPUS. Search terms related to caesarean section and organisational intervention will be used. Research published before 1980 will be excluded and only randomised controlled trials, cluster-randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised controlled trials, controlled before and after studies and interrupted time series studies will be included. Data extraction and quality assessments will be undertaken by two authors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this systematic review. The results of this study will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and presentation at professional conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016039458.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6082465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60824652018-08-10 Organisational interventions designed to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review protocol Hutchinson, Alison M Nagle, Cate Kent, Bridie Bick, Debra Lindberg, Rebecca BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: There is a growing body of evidence to indicate that both primary and subsequent caesarean sections are associated with increased maternal and perinatal morbidity. Efforts to reduce the number of clinically unnecessary caesarean sections are urgently required. Our objective is to systematically review published evidence on the effectiveness of maternity service organisational interventions, such as models of maternity care, that aim to reduce caesarean section rates. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Databases will be searched, including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, MEDLINE, Maternity and Infant Care, EMBASE and SCOPUS. Search terms related to caesarean section and organisational intervention will be used. Research published before 1980 will be excluded and only randomised controlled trials, cluster-randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised controlled trials, controlled before and after studies and interrupted time series studies will be included. Data extraction and quality assessments will be undertaken by two authors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this systematic review. The results of this study will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and presentation at professional conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016039458. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6082465/ /pubmed/30002008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021120 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Hutchinson, Alison M
Nagle, Cate
Kent, Bridie
Bick, Debra
Lindberg, Rebecca
Organisational interventions designed to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review protocol
title Organisational interventions designed to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review protocol
title_full Organisational interventions designed to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Organisational interventions designed to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Organisational interventions designed to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review protocol
title_short Organisational interventions designed to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review protocol
title_sort organisational interventions designed to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review protocol
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6082465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30002008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021120
work_keys_str_mv AT hutchinsonalisonm organisationalinterventionsdesignedtoreducecaesareansectionratesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT naglecate organisationalinterventionsdesignedtoreducecaesareansectionratesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT kentbridie organisationalinterventionsdesignedtoreducecaesareansectionratesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT bickdebra organisationalinterventionsdesignedtoreducecaesareansectionratesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT lindbergrebecca organisationalinterventionsdesignedtoreducecaesareansectionratesasystematicreviewprotocol