Cargando…
Organisational interventions designed to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review protocol
INTRODUCTION: There is a growing body of evidence to indicate that both primary and subsequent caesarean sections are associated with increased maternal and perinatal morbidity. Efforts to reduce the number of clinically unnecessary caesarean sections are urgently required. Our objective is to syste...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6082465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30002008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021120 |
_version_ | 1783345801046523904 |
---|---|
author | Hutchinson, Alison M Nagle, Cate Kent, Bridie Bick, Debra Lindberg, Rebecca |
author_facet | Hutchinson, Alison M Nagle, Cate Kent, Bridie Bick, Debra Lindberg, Rebecca |
author_sort | Hutchinson, Alison M |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: There is a growing body of evidence to indicate that both primary and subsequent caesarean sections are associated with increased maternal and perinatal morbidity. Efforts to reduce the number of clinically unnecessary caesarean sections are urgently required. Our objective is to systematically review published evidence on the effectiveness of maternity service organisational interventions, such as models of maternity care, that aim to reduce caesarean section rates. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Databases will be searched, including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, MEDLINE, Maternity and Infant Care, EMBASE and SCOPUS. Search terms related to caesarean section and organisational intervention will be used. Research published before 1980 will be excluded and only randomised controlled trials, cluster-randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised controlled trials, controlled before and after studies and interrupted time series studies will be included. Data extraction and quality assessments will be undertaken by two authors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this systematic review. The results of this study will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and presentation at professional conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016039458. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6082465 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60824652018-08-10 Organisational interventions designed to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review protocol Hutchinson, Alison M Nagle, Cate Kent, Bridie Bick, Debra Lindberg, Rebecca BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: There is a growing body of evidence to indicate that both primary and subsequent caesarean sections are associated with increased maternal and perinatal morbidity. Efforts to reduce the number of clinically unnecessary caesarean sections are urgently required. Our objective is to systematically review published evidence on the effectiveness of maternity service organisational interventions, such as models of maternity care, that aim to reduce caesarean section rates. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Databases will be searched, including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, MEDLINE, Maternity and Infant Care, EMBASE and SCOPUS. Search terms related to caesarean section and organisational intervention will be used. Research published before 1980 will be excluded and only randomised controlled trials, cluster-randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised controlled trials, controlled before and after studies and interrupted time series studies will be included. Data extraction and quality assessments will be undertaken by two authors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this systematic review. The results of this study will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and presentation at professional conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016039458. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6082465/ /pubmed/30002008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021120 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Hutchinson, Alison M Nagle, Cate Kent, Bridie Bick, Debra Lindberg, Rebecca Organisational interventions designed to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review protocol |
title | Organisational interventions designed to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review protocol |
title_full | Organisational interventions designed to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review protocol |
title_fullStr | Organisational interventions designed to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Organisational interventions designed to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review protocol |
title_short | Organisational interventions designed to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review protocol |
title_sort | organisational interventions designed to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review protocol |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6082465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30002008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hutchinsonalisonm organisationalinterventionsdesignedtoreducecaesareansectionratesasystematicreviewprotocol AT naglecate organisationalinterventionsdesignedtoreducecaesareansectionratesasystematicreviewprotocol AT kentbridie organisationalinterventionsdesignedtoreducecaesareansectionratesasystematicreviewprotocol AT bickdebra organisationalinterventionsdesignedtoreducecaesareansectionratesasystematicreviewprotocol AT lindbergrebecca organisationalinterventionsdesignedtoreducecaesareansectionratesasystematicreviewprotocol |