Cargando…
Comparison of self-reported measures of alcohol-related dependence among young Swiss men: a study protocol for a cross-sectional controlled sample
INTRODUCTION: Short screenings of alcohol-related dependence are needed for population-based assessments. A clinical interview constitutes a reliable diagnosis often seen as gold standard, but it is costly and time consuming and as such, not suitable for population-based assessments. Therefore, self...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6082486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30012797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023632 |
_version_ | 1783345805938130944 |
---|---|
author | Iglesias, Katia Sporkert, Frank Daeppen, Jean-Bernard Gmel, Gerhard Baggio, Stephanie |
author_facet | Iglesias, Katia Sporkert, Frank Daeppen, Jean-Bernard Gmel, Gerhard Baggio, Stephanie |
author_sort | Iglesias, Katia |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Short screenings of alcohol-related dependence are needed for population-based assessments. A clinical interview constitutes a reliable diagnosis often seen as gold standard, but it is costly and time consuming and as such, not suitable for population-based assessments. Therefore, self-reported questionnaires are needed (eg, alcohol use disorder (AUD) as in the Diagnostic and Statistic Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) 5), but their reliability is questionable. Recent studies called for more evidence-based measurements for population-based screening (eg, heavy alcohol use over time (HAU)). This study aims to test the reliability of different self-reported measures of alcohol use. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Based on stratified random selection, 280 participants will be recruited from the French-speaking subgroup of the Swiss National Science Foundation-supported Cohort Study on Substance Use and Risk Factors (C-SURF). This cohort is a population-based sample of young Swiss men in their mid-20s (n=2668). The sample size calculation is based on a proportion non-inferiority test (alpha=5%, power=80%, margin of equivalence=10%, difference in sensitivity between self-reported AUD and HAU=5%, correlation between AUD and HAU=0.35, and drop-outs=15%). Assessment will include a clinical interview as the gold standard of alcohol-related dependence, self-reported alcohol measures (HAU, AUD and drinking patterns), biomarkers as gold standards of chronic excessive drinking, and health outcomes. To assess the validity of the self-reported alcohol measures, sensitivity analyses will be run. The associations between alcohol-related measures and health outcomes will be tested. A non-response analysis will be run using the previous waves of the C-SURF study using logistic regressions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Canton of Vaud, Switzerland (no. 2017–00776). The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6082486 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60824862018-08-10 Comparison of self-reported measures of alcohol-related dependence among young Swiss men: a study protocol for a cross-sectional controlled sample Iglesias, Katia Sporkert, Frank Daeppen, Jean-Bernard Gmel, Gerhard Baggio, Stephanie BMJ Open 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023346Addiction INTRODUCTION: Short screenings of alcohol-related dependence are needed for population-based assessments. A clinical interview constitutes a reliable diagnosis often seen as gold standard, but it is costly and time consuming and as such, not suitable for population-based assessments. Therefore, self-reported questionnaires are needed (eg, alcohol use disorder (AUD) as in the Diagnostic and Statistic Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) 5), but their reliability is questionable. Recent studies called for more evidence-based measurements for population-based screening (eg, heavy alcohol use over time (HAU)). This study aims to test the reliability of different self-reported measures of alcohol use. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Based on stratified random selection, 280 participants will be recruited from the French-speaking subgroup of the Swiss National Science Foundation-supported Cohort Study on Substance Use and Risk Factors (C-SURF). This cohort is a population-based sample of young Swiss men in their mid-20s (n=2668). The sample size calculation is based on a proportion non-inferiority test (alpha=5%, power=80%, margin of equivalence=10%, difference in sensitivity between self-reported AUD and HAU=5%, correlation between AUD and HAU=0.35, and drop-outs=15%). Assessment will include a clinical interview as the gold standard of alcohol-related dependence, self-reported alcohol measures (HAU, AUD and drinking patterns), biomarkers as gold standards of chronic excessive drinking, and health outcomes. To assess the validity of the self-reported alcohol measures, sensitivity analyses will be run. The associations between alcohol-related measures and health outcomes will be tested. A non-response analysis will be run using the previous waves of the C-SURF study using logistic regressions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Canton of Vaud, Switzerland (no. 2017–00776). The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6082486/ /pubmed/30012797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023632 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023346Addiction Iglesias, Katia Sporkert, Frank Daeppen, Jean-Bernard Gmel, Gerhard Baggio, Stephanie Comparison of self-reported measures of alcohol-related dependence among young Swiss men: a study protocol for a cross-sectional controlled sample |
title | Comparison of self-reported measures of alcohol-related dependence among young Swiss men: a study protocol for a cross-sectional controlled sample |
title_full | Comparison of self-reported measures of alcohol-related dependence among young Swiss men: a study protocol for a cross-sectional controlled sample |
title_fullStr | Comparison of self-reported measures of alcohol-related dependence among young Swiss men: a study protocol for a cross-sectional controlled sample |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of self-reported measures of alcohol-related dependence among young Swiss men: a study protocol for a cross-sectional controlled sample |
title_short | Comparison of self-reported measures of alcohol-related dependence among young Swiss men: a study protocol for a cross-sectional controlled sample |
title_sort | comparison of self-reported measures of alcohol-related dependence among young swiss men: a study protocol for a cross-sectional controlled sample |
topic | 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023346Addiction |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6082486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30012797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023632 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iglesiaskatia comparisonofselfreportedmeasuresofalcoholrelateddependenceamongyoungswissmenastudyprotocolforacrosssectionalcontrolledsample AT sporkertfrank comparisonofselfreportedmeasuresofalcoholrelateddependenceamongyoungswissmenastudyprotocolforacrosssectionalcontrolledsample AT daeppenjeanbernard comparisonofselfreportedmeasuresofalcoholrelateddependenceamongyoungswissmenastudyprotocolforacrosssectionalcontrolledsample AT gmelgerhard comparisonofselfreportedmeasuresofalcoholrelateddependenceamongyoungswissmenastudyprotocolforacrosssectionalcontrolledsample AT baggiostephanie comparisonofselfreportedmeasuresofalcoholrelateddependenceamongyoungswissmenastudyprotocolforacrosssectionalcontrolledsample |