Cargando…

Comparing the Yield of Staphylococcus aureus Recovery with Static versus Agitated Broth Incubation

Given the lack of standardization of methodologies for microbial recovery from built environments, we sought to compare the yield of Staphylococcus aureus with a broth enrichment method when incubated in agitated versus static conditions. Five unique strains of S. aureus at five different concentrat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muenks, Carol E., Hogan, Patrick G., Burnham, Carey-Ann D., Fritz, Stephanie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6083490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30147954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1462671
_version_ 1783345983797592064
author Muenks, Carol E.
Hogan, Patrick G.
Burnham, Carey-Ann D.
Fritz, Stephanie A.
author_facet Muenks, Carol E.
Hogan, Patrick G.
Burnham, Carey-Ann D.
Fritz, Stephanie A.
author_sort Muenks, Carol E.
collection PubMed
description Given the lack of standardization of methodologies for microbial recovery from built environments, we sought to compare the yield of Staphylococcus aureus with a broth enrichment method when incubated in agitated versus static conditions. Five unique strains of S. aureus at five different concentrations were cultured to compare direct plating, agitated broth enrichment, and static broth enrichment culture methods. All samples were incubated at 35° in ambient air. The lowest concentration recovered across three replicates and five strains did not differ between culture methods (Fisher's exact test, p=0.50); notably, recovery of S. aureus was equivalent between static and agitated broth incubation. When broth enrichment was used (both static and agitated), the burden of S. aureus growth was higher (by semiquantitative assessment of 4-quadrant streaking) compared to the direct plating culture method. Optimizing strategies for microbial recovery is essential, particularly in areas of lower biomass, given the paucity of research concerning microbial communities of built environments. The results of this study, in conjunction with other experiments investigating microbiomes of built environments, can help inform protocols for standardizing culturing methods within built environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6083490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60834902018-08-26 Comparing the Yield of Staphylococcus aureus Recovery with Static versus Agitated Broth Incubation Muenks, Carol E. Hogan, Patrick G. Burnham, Carey-Ann D. Fritz, Stephanie A. J Pathog Research Article Given the lack of standardization of methodologies for microbial recovery from built environments, we sought to compare the yield of Staphylococcus aureus with a broth enrichment method when incubated in agitated versus static conditions. Five unique strains of S. aureus at five different concentrations were cultured to compare direct plating, agitated broth enrichment, and static broth enrichment culture methods. All samples were incubated at 35° in ambient air. The lowest concentration recovered across three replicates and five strains did not differ between culture methods (Fisher's exact test, p=0.50); notably, recovery of S. aureus was equivalent between static and agitated broth incubation. When broth enrichment was used (both static and agitated), the burden of S. aureus growth was higher (by semiquantitative assessment of 4-quadrant streaking) compared to the direct plating culture method. Optimizing strategies for microbial recovery is essential, particularly in areas of lower biomass, given the paucity of research concerning microbial communities of built environments. The results of this study, in conjunction with other experiments investigating microbiomes of built environments, can help inform protocols for standardizing culturing methods within built environments. Hindawi 2018-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6083490/ /pubmed/30147954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1462671 Text en Copyright © 2018 Carol E. Muenks et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Muenks, Carol E.
Hogan, Patrick G.
Burnham, Carey-Ann D.
Fritz, Stephanie A.
Comparing the Yield of Staphylococcus aureus Recovery with Static versus Agitated Broth Incubation
title Comparing the Yield of Staphylococcus aureus Recovery with Static versus Agitated Broth Incubation
title_full Comparing the Yield of Staphylococcus aureus Recovery with Static versus Agitated Broth Incubation
title_fullStr Comparing the Yield of Staphylococcus aureus Recovery with Static versus Agitated Broth Incubation
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Yield of Staphylococcus aureus Recovery with Static versus Agitated Broth Incubation
title_short Comparing the Yield of Staphylococcus aureus Recovery with Static versus Agitated Broth Incubation
title_sort comparing the yield of staphylococcus aureus recovery with static versus agitated broth incubation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6083490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30147954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1462671
work_keys_str_mv AT muenkscarole comparingtheyieldofstaphylococcusaureusrecoverywithstaticversusagitatedbrothincubation
AT hoganpatrickg comparingtheyieldofstaphylococcusaureusrecoverywithstaticversusagitatedbrothincubation
AT burnhamcareyannd comparingtheyieldofstaphylococcusaureusrecoverywithstaticversusagitatedbrothincubation
AT fritzstephaniea comparingtheyieldofstaphylococcusaureusrecoverywithstaticversusagitatedbrothincubation