Cargando…
Comparing the Yield of Staphylococcus aureus Recovery with Static versus Agitated Broth Incubation
Given the lack of standardization of methodologies for microbial recovery from built environments, we sought to compare the yield of Staphylococcus aureus with a broth enrichment method when incubated in agitated versus static conditions. Five unique strains of S. aureus at five different concentrat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6083490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30147954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1462671 |
_version_ | 1783345983797592064 |
---|---|
author | Muenks, Carol E. Hogan, Patrick G. Burnham, Carey-Ann D. Fritz, Stephanie A. |
author_facet | Muenks, Carol E. Hogan, Patrick G. Burnham, Carey-Ann D. Fritz, Stephanie A. |
author_sort | Muenks, Carol E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Given the lack of standardization of methodologies for microbial recovery from built environments, we sought to compare the yield of Staphylococcus aureus with a broth enrichment method when incubated in agitated versus static conditions. Five unique strains of S. aureus at five different concentrations were cultured to compare direct plating, agitated broth enrichment, and static broth enrichment culture methods. All samples were incubated at 35° in ambient air. The lowest concentration recovered across three replicates and five strains did not differ between culture methods (Fisher's exact test, p=0.50); notably, recovery of S. aureus was equivalent between static and agitated broth incubation. When broth enrichment was used (both static and agitated), the burden of S. aureus growth was higher (by semiquantitative assessment of 4-quadrant streaking) compared to the direct plating culture method. Optimizing strategies for microbial recovery is essential, particularly in areas of lower biomass, given the paucity of research concerning microbial communities of built environments. The results of this study, in conjunction with other experiments investigating microbiomes of built environments, can help inform protocols for standardizing culturing methods within built environments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6083490 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60834902018-08-26 Comparing the Yield of Staphylococcus aureus Recovery with Static versus Agitated Broth Incubation Muenks, Carol E. Hogan, Patrick G. Burnham, Carey-Ann D. Fritz, Stephanie A. J Pathog Research Article Given the lack of standardization of methodologies for microbial recovery from built environments, we sought to compare the yield of Staphylococcus aureus with a broth enrichment method when incubated in agitated versus static conditions. Five unique strains of S. aureus at five different concentrations were cultured to compare direct plating, agitated broth enrichment, and static broth enrichment culture methods. All samples were incubated at 35° in ambient air. The lowest concentration recovered across three replicates and five strains did not differ between culture methods (Fisher's exact test, p=0.50); notably, recovery of S. aureus was equivalent between static and agitated broth incubation. When broth enrichment was used (both static and agitated), the burden of S. aureus growth was higher (by semiquantitative assessment of 4-quadrant streaking) compared to the direct plating culture method. Optimizing strategies for microbial recovery is essential, particularly in areas of lower biomass, given the paucity of research concerning microbial communities of built environments. The results of this study, in conjunction with other experiments investigating microbiomes of built environments, can help inform protocols for standardizing culturing methods within built environments. Hindawi 2018-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6083490/ /pubmed/30147954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1462671 Text en Copyright © 2018 Carol E. Muenks et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Muenks, Carol E. Hogan, Patrick G. Burnham, Carey-Ann D. Fritz, Stephanie A. Comparing the Yield of Staphylococcus aureus Recovery with Static versus Agitated Broth Incubation |
title | Comparing the Yield of Staphylococcus aureus Recovery with Static versus Agitated Broth Incubation |
title_full | Comparing the Yield of Staphylococcus aureus Recovery with Static versus Agitated Broth Incubation |
title_fullStr | Comparing the Yield of Staphylococcus aureus Recovery with Static versus Agitated Broth Incubation |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the Yield of Staphylococcus aureus Recovery with Static versus Agitated Broth Incubation |
title_short | Comparing the Yield of Staphylococcus aureus Recovery with Static versus Agitated Broth Incubation |
title_sort | comparing the yield of staphylococcus aureus recovery with static versus agitated broth incubation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6083490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30147954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1462671 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muenkscarole comparingtheyieldofstaphylococcusaureusrecoverywithstaticversusagitatedbrothincubation AT hoganpatrickg comparingtheyieldofstaphylococcusaureusrecoverywithstaticversusagitatedbrothincubation AT burnhamcareyannd comparingtheyieldofstaphylococcusaureusrecoverywithstaticversusagitatedbrothincubation AT fritzstephaniea comparingtheyieldofstaphylococcusaureusrecoverywithstaticversusagitatedbrothincubation |