Cargando…

Internists’ and intensivists’ roles in intensive care admission decisions: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Intensive care Unit (ICU) admission decisions involve collaboration between internists and intensivists. Clear perception of each other’s roles is a prerequisite for good collaboration. The objective was to explore how internists and intensivists perceive their roles during admission dec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cullati, Stéphane, Hudelson, Patricia, Ricou, Bara, Nendaz, Mathieu, Perneger, Thomas V., Escher, Monica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6083517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30089526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3438-6
_version_ 1783345990085902336
author Cullati, Stéphane
Hudelson, Patricia
Ricou, Bara
Nendaz, Mathieu
Perneger, Thomas V.
Escher, Monica
author_facet Cullati, Stéphane
Hudelson, Patricia
Ricou, Bara
Nendaz, Mathieu
Perneger, Thomas V.
Escher, Monica
author_sort Cullati, Stéphane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intensive care Unit (ICU) admission decisions involve collaboration between internists and intensivists. Clear perception of each other’s roles is a prerequisite for good collaboration. The objective was to explore how internists and intensivists perceive their roles during admission decisions. METHODS: Individual in-depth interviews with 12 intensivists and 12 internists working at a Swiss teaching hospital. Interviews were analyzed using a thematic approach. RESULTS: Roles could be divided into practical roles and identity roles. Internist and intensivists had the same perception of each other’s practical roles. Internists’ practical roles were: recognizing signs of severity when the patient becomes acutely ill, calling the intensivist at the right moment, having the relevant information about the patient and having determined the goals of care. Intensivists’ practical roles were: assessing the patient on the ward, giving expert advice, making quick decisions, managing access to the ICU, having the final decision power and, sometimes, deciding whether or not to limit treatment. In complex situations, perceived flaws in performing practical roles could create tensions between the doctors. Intensivists’ identity roles included those of leader, gatekeeper, life-death decision maker, and supporting colleague doctors (consultant, senior and helper). These roles could be perceived as emotionally burdensome. Internists’ identity roles were those of leader and partner. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a common perception of each other’s practical roles, tensions can arise between internists and intensivists in complex situations of ICU admission decisions. Training in communication skills and interprofessional education interventions aimed at a better understanding of each other roles would improve collaboration. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3438-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6083517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60835172018-08-10 Internists’ and intensivists’ roles in intensive care admission decisions: a qualitative study Cullati, Stéphane Hudelson, Patricia Ricou, Bara Nendaz, Mathieu Perneger, Thomas V. Escher, Monica BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Intensive care Unit (ICU) admission decisions involve collaboration between internists and intensivists. Clear perception of each other’s roles is a prerequisite for good collaboration. The objective was to explore how internists and intensivists perceive their roles during admission decisions. METHODS: Individual in-depth interviews with 12 intensivists and 12 internists working at a Swiss teaching hospital. Interviews were analyzed using a thematic approach. RESULTS: Roles could be divided into practical roles and identity roles. Internist and intensivists had the same perception of each other’s practical roles. Internists’ practical roles were: recognizing signs of severity when the patient becomes acutely ill, calling the intensivist at the right moment, having the relevant information about the patient and having determined the goals of care. Intensivists’ practical roles were: assessing the patient on the ward, giving expert advice, making quick decisions, managing access to the ICU, having the final decision power and, sometimes, deciding whether or not to limit treatment. In complex situations, perceived flaws in performing practical roles could create tensions between the doctors. Intensivists’ identity roles included those of leader, gatekeeper, life-death decision maker, and supporting colleague doctors (consultant, senior and helper). These roles could be perceived as emotionally burdensome. Internists’ identity roles were those of leader and partner. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a common perception of each other’s practical roles, tensions can arise between internists and intensivists in complex situations of ICU admission decisions. Training in communication skills and interprofessional education interventions aimed at a better understanding of each other roles would improve collaboration. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3438-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6083517/ /pubmed/30089526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3438-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cullati, Stéphane
Hudelson, Patricia
Ricou, Bara
Nendaz, Mathieu
Perneger, Thomas V.
Escher, Monica
Internists’ and intensivists’ roles in intensive care admission decisions: a qualitative study
title Internists’ and intensivists’ roles in intensive care admission decisions: a qualitative study
title_full Internists’ and intensivists’ roles in intensive care admission decisions: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Internists’ and intensivists’ roles in intensive care admission decisions: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Internists’ and intensivists’ roles in intensive care admission decisions: a qualitative study
title_short Internists’ and intensivists’ roles in intensive care admission decisions: a qualitative study
title_sort internists’ and intensivists’ roles in intensive care admission decisions: a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6083517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30089526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3438-6
work_keys_str_mv AT cullatistephane internistsandintensivistsrolesinintensivecareadmissiondecisionsaqualitativestudy
AT hudelsonpatricia internistsandintensivistsrolesinintensivecareadmissiondecisionsaqualitativestudy
AT ricoubara internistsandintensivistsrolesinintensivecareadmissiondecisionsaqualitativestudy
AT nendazmathieu internistsandintensivistsrolesinintensivecareadmissiondecisionsaqualitativestudy
AT pernegerthomasv internistsandintensivistsrolesinintensivecareadmissiondecisionsaqualitativestudy
AT eschermonica internistsandintensivistsrolesinintensivecareadmissiondecisionsaqualitativestudy