Cargando…
Validity of an online 24-h recall tool (myfood24) for dietary assessment in population studies: comparison with biomarkers and standard interviews
BACKGROUND: Online dietary assessment tools can reduce administrative costs and facilitate repeated dietary assessment during follow-up in large-scale studies. However, information on bias due to measurement error of such tools is limited. We developed an online 24-h recall (myfood24) and compared i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6083628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30089491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1113-8 |
_version_ | 1783346015899746304 |
---|---|
author | Wark, Petra A. Hardie, Laura J. Frost, Gary S. Alwan, Nisreen A. Carter, Michelle Elliott, Paul Ford, Heather E. Hancock, Neil Morris, Michelle A. Mulla, Umme Z. Noorwali, Essra A. Petropoulou, K. Murphy, David Potter, Gregory D. M. Riboli, Elio Greenwood, Darren C. Cade, Janet E. |
author_facet | Wark, Petra A. Hardie, Laura J. Frost, Gary S. Alwan, Nisreen A. Carter, Michelle Elliott, Paul Ford, Heather E. Hancock, Neil Morris, Michelle A. Mulla, Umme Z. Noorwali, Essra A. Petropoulou, K. Murphy, David Potter, Gregory D. M. Riboli, Elio Greenwood, Darren C. Cade, Janet E. |
author_sort | Wark, Petra A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Online dietary assessment tools can reduce administrative costs and facilitate repeated dietary assessment during follow-up in large-scale studies. However, information on bias due to measurement error of such tools is limited. We developed an online 24-h recall (myfood24) and compared its performance with a traditional interviewer-administered multiple-pass 24-h recall, assessing both against biomarkers. METHODS: Metabolically stable adults were recruited and completed the new online dietary recall, an interviewer-based multiple pass recall and a suite of reference measures. Longer-term dietary intake was estimated from up to 3 × 24-h recalls taken 2 weeks apart. Estimated intakes of protein, potassium and sodium were compared with urinary biomarker concentrations. Estimated total sugar intake was compared with a predictive biomarker and estimated energy intake compared with energy expenditure measured by accelerometry and calorimetry. Nutrient intakes were also compared to those derived from an interviewer-administered multiple-pass 24-h recall. RESULTS: Biomarker samples were received from 212 participants on at least one occasion. Both self-reported dietary assessment tools led to attenuation compared to biomarkers. The online tools resulted in attenuation factors of around 0.2–0.3 and partial correlation coefficients, reflecting ranking intakes, of approximately 0.3–0.4. This was broadly similar to the more administratively burdensome interviewer-based tool. Other nutrient estimates derived from myfood24 were around 10–20% lower than those from the interviewer-based tool, with wide limits of agreement. Intraclass correlation coefficients were approximately 0.4–0.5, indicating consistent moderate agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that, whilst results from both measures of self-reported diet are attenuated compared to biomarker measures, the myfood24 online 24-h recall is comparable to the more time-consuming and costly interviewer-based 24-h recall across a range of measures. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12916-018-1113-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6083628 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60836282018-08-16 Validity of an online 24-h recall tool (myfood24) for dietary assessment in population studies: comparison with biomarkers and standard interviews Wark, Petra A. Hardie, Laura J. Frost, Gary S. Alwan, Nisreen A. Carter, Michelle Elliott, Paul Ford, Heather E. Hancock, Neil Morris, Michelle A. Mulla, Umme Z. Noorwali, Essra A. Petropoulou, K. Murphy, David Potter, Gregory D. M. Riboli, Elio Greenwood, Darren C. Cade, Janet E. BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Online dietary assessment tools can reduce administrative costs and facilitate repeated dietary assessment during follow-up in large-scale studies. However, information on bias due to measurement error of such tools is limited. We developed an online 24-h recall (myfood24) and compared its performance with a traditional interviewer-administered multiple-pass 24-h recall, assessing both against biomarkers. METHODS: Metabolically stable adults were recruited and completed the new online dietary recall, an interviewer-based multiple pass recall and a suite of reference measures. Longer-term dietary intake was estimated from up to 3 × 24-h recalls taken 2 weeks apart. Estimated intakes of protein, potassium and sodium were compared with urinary biomarker concentrations. Estimated total sugar intake was compared with a predictive biomarker and estimated energy intake compared with energy expenditure measured by accelerometry and calorimetry. Nutrient intakes were also compared to those derived from an interviewer-administered multiple-pass 24-h recall. RESULTS: Biomarker samples were received from 212 participants on at least one occasion. Both self-reported dietary assessment tools led to attenuation compared to biomarkers. The online tools resulted in attenuation factors of around 0.2–0.3 and partial correlation coefficients, reflecting ranking intakes, of approximately 0.3–0.4. This was broadly similar to the more administratively burdensome interviewer-based tool. Other nutrient estimates derived from myfood24 were around 10–20% lower than those from the interviewer-based tool, with wide limits of agreement. Intraclass correlation coefficients were approximately 0.4–0.5, indicating consistent moderate agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that, whilst results from both measures of self-reported diet are attenuated compared to biomarker measures, the myfood24 online 24-h recall is comparable to the more time-consuming and costly interviewer-based 24-h recall across a range of measures. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12916-018-1113-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6083628/ /pubmed/30089491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1113-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wark, Petra A. Hardie, Laura J. Frost, Gary S. Alwan, Nisreen A. Carter, Michelle Elliott, Paul Ford, Heather E. Hancock, Neil Morris, Michelle A. Mulla, Umme Z. Noorwali, Essra A. Petropoulou, K. Murphy, David Potter, Gregory D. M. Riboli, Elio Greenwood, Darren C. Cade, Janet E. Validity of an online 24-h recall tool (myfood24) for dietary assessment in population studies: comparison with biomarkers and standard interviews |
title | Validity of an online 24-h recall tool (myfood24) for dietary assessment in population studies: comparison with biomarkers and standard interviews |
title_full | Validity of an online 24-h recall tool (myfood24) for dietary assessment in population studies: comparison with biomarkers and standard interviews |
title_fullStr | Validity of an online 24-h recall tool (myfood24) for dietary assessment in population studies: comparison with biomarkers and standard interviews |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity of an online 24-h recall tool (myfood24) for dietary assessment in population studies: comparison with biomarkers and standard interviews |
title_short | Validity of an online 24-h recall tool (myfood24) for dietary assessment in population studies: comparison with biomarkers and standard interviews |
title_sort | validity of an online 24-h recall tool (myfood24) for dietary assessment in population studies: comparison with biomarkers and standard interviews |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6083628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30089491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1113-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT warkpetraa validityofanonline24hrecalltoolmyfood24fordietaryassessmentinpopulationstudiescomparisonwithbiomarkersandstandardinterviews AT hardielauraj validityofanonline24hrecalltoolmyfood24fordietaryassessmentinpopulationstudiescomparisonwithbiomarkersandstandardinterviews AT frostgarys validityofanonline24hrecalltoolmyfood24fordietaryassessmentinpopulationstudiescomparisonwithbiomarkersandstandardinterviews AT alwannisreena validityofanonline24hrecalltoolmyfood24fordietaryassessmentinpopulationstudiescomparisonwithbiomarkersandstandardinterviews AT cartermichelle validityofanonline24hrecalltoolmyfood24fordietaryassessmentinpopulationstudiescomparisonwithbiomarkersandstandardinterviews AT elliottpaul validityofanonline24hrecalltoolmyfood24fordietaryassessmentinpopulationstudiescomparisonwithbiomarkersandstandardinterviews AT fordheathere validityofanonline24hrecalltoolmyfood24fordietaryassessmentinpopulationstudiescomparisonwithbiomarkersandstandardinterviews AT hancockneil validityofanonline24hrecalltoolmyfood24fordietaryassessmentinpopulationstudiescomparisonwithbiomarkersandstandardinterviews AT morrismichellea validityofanonline24hrecalltoolmyfood24fordietaryassessmentinpopulationstudiescomparisonwithbiomarkersandstandardinterviews AT mullaummez validityofanonline24hrecalltoolmyfood24fordietaryassessmentinpopulationstudiescomparisonwithbiomarkersandstandardinterviews AT noorwaliessraa validityofanonline24hrecalltoolmyfood24fordietaryassessmentinpopulationstudiescomparisonwithbiomarkersandstandardinterviews AT petropoulouk validityofanonline24hrecalltoolmyfood24fordietaryassessmentinpopulationstudiescomparisonwithbiomarkersandstandardinterviews AT murphydavid validityofanonline24hrecalltoolmyfood24fordietaryassessmentinpopulationstudiescomparisonwithbiomarkersandstandardinterviews AT pottergregorydm validityofanonline24hrecalltoolmyfood24fordietaryassessmentinpopulationstudiescomparisonwithbiomarkersandstandardinterviews AT ribolielio validityofanonline24hrecalltoolmyfood24fordietaryassessmentinpopulationstudiescomparisonwithbiomarkersandstandardinterviews AT greenwooddarrenc validityofanonline24hrecalltoolmyfood24fordietaryassessmentinpopulationstudiescomparisonwithbiomarkersandstandardinterviews AT cadejanete validityofanonline24hrecalltoolmyfood24fordietaryassessmentinpopulationstudiescomparisonwithbiomarkersandstandardinterviews |