Cargando…

Randomized Prospective Trial of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff With or Without Acromioplasty: No Difference in Patient-reported Outcomes at Long-term Follow-up

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate long-term clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without acromioplasty. METHODS: Between 2007-2011, prospectively-enrolled patients undergoing arthroscopic repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears were previously randomized into either acromiopl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waterman, Brian Robert, Newgren, Jonathan, Gowd, Anirudh K., Cabarcas, Brandon C., Bach, Bernard R., Cole, Brian J., Romeo, Anthony A., Verma, Nikhil N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6083811/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118S00080
_version_ 1783346054067912704
author Waterman, Brian Robert
Newgren, Jonathan
Gowd, Anirudh K.
Cabarcas, Brandon C.
Bach, Bernard R.
Cole, Brian J.
Romeo, Anthony A.
Verma, Nikhil N.
author_facet Waterman, Brian Robert
Newgren, Jonathan
Gowd, Anirudh K.
Cabarcas, Brandon C.
Bach, Bernard R.
Cole, Brian J.
Romeo, Anthony A.
Verma, Nikhil N.
author_sort Waterman, Brian Robert
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate long-term clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without acromioplasty. METHODS: Between 2007-2011, prospectively-enrolled patients undergoing arthroscopic repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears were previously randomized into either acromioplasty or non-acromioplasty groups. Patients with death, advanced neurologic conditions, or subsequent shoulder arthroplasty were excluded. Baseline and long-term follow-up questionnaires, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, and Constant scores were obtained. Rates of revision rotator cuff surgery, or secondary reoperation were recorded. Averages with standard deviation (SD) were calculated, and t-tests were utilized to compare outcomes of interest between cohorts. RESULTS: After exclusion of 5 additional patients from the short-term follow-up study, 66 of 90 patients (73.3%) were available at 92.4 months (±10.5). Comparison of baseline demographics and intraoperative information revealed no significant differences, including age, gender, workers compensation, acute mechanism of injury, tear size, degree of retraction, and surgical technique (e.g. single- vs. double-row). At final follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences according to ASES (p=0.33), VAS pain (p=0.79), Constant (p=0.17), SST (p=0.05), UCLA (p=0.19), and SF-12 (p=0.79) in patients with and without acromioplasty (Figure 1). One patient with acromioplasty (2.9%) and two patients without acromioplasty (6.3%) sustained atraumatic recurrent rotator cuff tear with secondary repair (p=0.99). CONCLUSION: Combined acromioplasty and rotator cuff repair offer no significant long-term benefits in patient-reported outcomes or secondary surgery when compared to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6083811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60838112018-08-14 Randomized Prospective Trial of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff With or Without Acromioplasty: No Difference in Patient-reported Outcomes at Long-term Follow-up Waterman, Brian Robert Newgren, Jonathan Gowd, Anirudh K. Cabarcas, Brandon C. Bach, Bernard R. Cole, Brian J. Romeo, Anthony A. Verma, Nikhil N. Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate long-term clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without acromioplasty. METHODS: Between 2007-2011, prospectively-enrolled patients undergoing arthroscopic repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears were previously randomized into either acromioplasty or non-acromioplasty groups. Patients with death, advanced neurologic conditions, or subsequent shoulder arthroplasty were excluded. Baseline and long-term follow-up questionnaires, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, and Constant scores were obtained. Rates of revision rotator cuff surgery, or secondary reoperation were recorded. Averages with standard deviation (SD) were calculated, and t-tests were utilized to compare outcomes of interest between cohorts. RESULTS: After exclusion of 5 additional patients from the short-term follow-up study, 66 of 90 patients (73.3%) were available at 92.4 months (±10.5). Comparison of baseline demographics and intraoperative information revealed no significant differences, including age, gender, workers compensation, acute mechanism of injury, tear size, degree of retraction, and surgical technique (e.g. single- vs. double-row). At final follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences according to ASES (p=0.33), VAS pain (p=0.79), Constant (p=0.17), SST (p=0.05), UCLA (p=0.19), and SF-12 (p=0.79) in patients with and without acromioplasty (Figure 1). One patient with acromioplasty (2.9%) and two patients without acromioplasty (6.3%) sustained atraumatic recurrent rotator cuff tear with secondary repair (p=0.99). CONCLUSION: Combined acromioplasty and rotator cuff repair offer no significant long-term benefits in patient-reported outcomes or secondary surgery when compared to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair alone. SAGE Publications 2018-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6083811/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118S00080 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Waterman, Brian Robert
Newgren, Jonathan
Gowd, Anirudh K.
Cabarcas, Brandon C.
Bach, Bernard R.
Cole, Brian J.
Romeo, Anthony A.
Verma, Nikhil N.
Randomized Prospective Trial of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff With or Without Acromioplasty: No Difference in Patient-reported Outcomes at Long-term Follow-up
title Randomized Prospective Trial of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff With or Without Acromioplasty: No Difference in Patient-reported Outcomes at Long-term Follow-up
title_full Randomized Prospective Trial of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff With or Without Acromioplasty: No Difference in Patient-reported Outcomes at Long-term Follow-up
title_fullStr Randomized Prospective Trial of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff With or Without Acromioplasty: No Difference in Patient-reported Outcomes at Long-term Follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Randomized Prospective Trial of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff With or Without Acromioplasty: No Difference in Patient-reported Outcomes at Long-term Follow-up
title_short Randomized Prospective Trial of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff With or Without Acromioplasty: No Difference in Patient-reported Outcomes at Long-term Follow-up
title_sort randomized prospective trial of arthroscopic rotator cuff with or without acromioplasty: no difference in patient-reported outcomes at long-term follow-up
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6083811/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118S00080
work_keys_str_mv AT watermanbrianrobert randomizedprospectivetrialofarthroscopicrotatorcuffwithorwithoutacromioplastynodifferenceinpatientreportedoutcomesatlongtermfollowup
AT newgrenjonathan randomizedprospectivetrialofarthroscopicrotatorcuffwithorwithoutacromioplastynodifferenceinpatientreportedoutcomesatlongtermfollowup
AT gowdanirudhk randomizedprospectivetrialofarthroscopicrotatorcuffwithorwithoutacromioplastynodifferenceinpatientreportedoutcomesatlongtermfollowup
AT cabarcasbrandonc randomizedprospectivetrialofarthroscopicrotatorcuffwithorwithoutacromioplastynodifferenceinpatientreportedoutcomesatlongtermfollowup
AT bachbernardr randomizedprospectivetrialofarthroscopicrotatorcuffwithorwithoutacromioplastynodifferenceinpatientreportedoutcomesatlongtermfollowup
AT colebrianj randomizedprospectivetrialofarthroscopicrotatorcuffwithorwithoutacromioplastynodifferenceinpatientreportedoutcomesatlongtermfollowup
AT romeoanthonya randomizedprospectivetrialofarthroscopicrotatorcuffwithorwithoutacromioplastynodifferenceinpatientreportedoutcomesatlongtermfollowup
AT vermanikhiln randomizedprospectivetrialofarthroscopicrotatorcuffwithorwithoutacromioplastynodifferenceinpatientreportedoutcomesatlongtermfollowup