Cargando…
Organic Nitrogen in Precipitation: Real Problem or Sampling Artefact?
Published observations of organic nitrogen (N) compounds in precipitation go back almost a century. Several different methods have been used to measure both the total and ionic concentrations of N. There is therefore some uncertainty as to whether reported “organic N” is real, or simply the result o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
2001
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6084209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12805792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.278 |
_version_ | 1783346130078138368 |
---|---|
author | Cape, J.N. Kirika, A. Rowland, A.P. Wilson, D.R. Jickells, T.D. Cornell, S. |
author_facet | Cape, J.N. Kirika, A. Rowland, A.P. Wilson, D.R. Jickells, T.D. Cornell, S. |
author_sort | Cape, J.N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Published observations of organic nitrogen (N) compounds in precipitation go back almost a century. Several different methods have been used to measure both the total and ionic concentrations of N. There is therefore some uncertainty as to whether reported “organic N” is real, or simply the result of uncertainties in chemical analyses or inadequate sampling methods. We found that the materials from which the collector was made (polypropylene, steel, or glass) had no significant effect on the composition of dissolved organic N (DON). The use of a biocide was found to be very important during sampling and storage of samples before analysis. We set up a network of seven collectors across the U.K., from the Cairngorms to Dorset, all operating to the same protocol, and including a biocide. Samples were analysed centrally, using proven methods. Over 6 months, organic N contributed about 20% to the total N in U.K. precipitation, but with a large variation across the country. This means that current estimates of wet deposited N to the U.K., which are based only on the ammonium and nitrate concentrations, are too small. Organic N is not an artefact, but a real problem that needs to be addressed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6084209 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2001 |
publisher | TheScientificWorldJOURNAL |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60842092018-08-26 Organic Nitrogen in Precipitation: Real Problem or Sampling Artefact? Cape, J.N. Kirika, A. Rowland, A.P. Wilson, D.R. Jickells, T.D. Cornell, S. ScientificWorldJournal Research Article Published observations of organic nitrogen (N) compounds in precipitation go back almost a century. Several different methods have been used to measure both the total and ionic concentrations of N. There is therefore some uncertainty as to whether reported “organic N” is real, or simply the result of uncertainties in chemical analyses or inadequate sampling methods. We found that the materials from which the collector was made (polypropylene, steel, or glass) had no significant effect on the composition of dissolved organic N (DON). The use of a biocide was found to be very important during sampling and storage of samples before analysis. We set up a network of seven collectors across the U.K., from the Cairngorms to Dorset, all operating to the same protocol, and including a biocide. Samples were analysed centrally, using proven methods. Over 6 months, organic N contributed about 20% to the total N in U.K. precipitation, but with a large variation across the country. This means that current estimates of wet deposited N to the U.K., which are based only on the ammonium and nitrate concentrations, are too small. Organic N is not an artefact, but a real problem that needs to be addressed. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2001-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6084209/ /pubmed/12805792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.278 Text en Copyright © 2001 J.N. Cape et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cape, J.N. Kirika, A. Rowland, A.P. Wilson, D.R. Jickells, T.D. Cornell, S. Organic Nitrogen in Precipitation: Real Problem or Sampling Artefact? |
title | Organic Nitrogen in Precipitation: Real Problem or Sampling Artefact? |
title_full | Organic Nitrogen in Precipitation: Real Problem or Sampling Artefact? |
title_fullStr | Organic Nitrogen in Precipitation: Real Problem or Sampling Artefact? |
title_full_unstemmed | Organic Nitrogen in Precipitation: Real Problem or Sampling Artefact? |
title_short | Organic Nitrogen in Precipitation: Real Problem or Sampling Artefact? |
title_sort | organic nitrogen in precipitation: real problem or sampling artefact? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6084209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12805792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.278 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT capejn organicnitrogeninprecipitationrealproblemorsamplingartefact AT kirikaa organicnitrogeninprecipitationrealproblemorsamplingartefact AT rowlandap organicnitrogeninprecipitationrealproblemorsamplingartefact AT wilsondr organicnitrogeninprecipitationrealproblemorsamplingartefact AT jickellstd organicnitrogeninprecipitationrealproblemorsamplingartefact AT cornells organicnitrogeninprecipitationrealproblemorsamplingartefact |