Cargando…

Organic Nitrogen in Precipitation: Real Problem or Sampling Artefact?

Published observations of organic nitrogen (N) compounds in precipitation go back almost a century. Several different methods have been used to measure both the total and ionic concentrations of N. There is therefore some uncertainty as to whether reported “organic N” is real, or simply the result o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cape, J.N., Kirika, A., Rowland, A.P., Wilson, D.R., Jickells, T.D., Cornell, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6084209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12805792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.278
_version_ 1783346130078138368
author Cape, J.N.
Kirika, A.
Rowland, A.P.
Wilson, D.R.
Jickells, T.D.
Cornell, S.
author_facet Cape, J.N.
Kirika, A.
Rowland, A.P.
Wilson, D.R.
Jickells, T.D.
Cornell, S.
author_sort Cape, J.N.
collection PubMed
description Published observations of organic nitrogen (N) compounds in precipitation go back almost a century. Several different methods have been used to measure both the total and ionic concentrations of N. There is therefore some uncertainty as to whether reported “organic N” is real, or simply the result of uncertainties in chemical analyses or inadequate sampling methods. We found that the materials from which the collector was made (polypropylene, steel, or glass) had no significant effect on the composition of dissolved organic N (DON). The use of a biocide was found to be very important during sampling and storage of samples before analysis. We set up a network of seven collectors across the U.K., from the Cairngorms to Dorset, all operating to the same protocol, and including a biocide. Samples were analysed centrally, using proven methods. Over 6 months, organic N contributed about 20% to the total N in U.K. precipitation, but with a large variation across the country. This means that current estimates of wet deposited N to the U.K., which are based only on the ammonium and nitrate concentrations, are too small. Organic N is not an artefact, but a real problem that needs to be addressed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6084209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60842092018-08-26 Organic Nitrogen in Precipitation: Real Problem or Sampling Artefact? Cape, J.N. Kirika, A. Rowland, A.P. Wilson, D.R. Jickells, T.D. Cornell, S. ScientificWorldJournal Research Article Published observations of organic nitrogen (N) compounds in precipitation go back almost a century. Several different methods have been used to measure both the total and ionic concentrations of N. There is therefore some uncertainty as to whether reported “organic N” is real, or simply the result of uncertainties in chemical analyses or inadequate sampling methods. We found that the materials from which the collector was made (polypropylene, steel, or glass) had no significant effect on the composition of dissolved organic N (DON). The use of a biocide was found to be very important during sampling and storage of samples before analysis. We set up a network of seven collectors across the U.K., from the Cairngorms to Dorset, all operating to the same protocol, and including a biocide. Samples were analysed centrally, using proven methods. Over 6 months, organic N contributed about 20% to the total N in U.K. precipitation, but with a large variation across the country. This means that current estimates of wet deposited N to the U.K., which are based only on the ammonium and nitrate concentrations, are too small. Organic N is not an artefact, but a real problem that needs to be addressed. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2001-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6084209/ /pubmed/12805792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.278 Text en Copyright © 2001 J.N. Cape et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cape, J.N.
Kirika, A.
Rowland, A.P.
Wilson, D.R.
Jickells, T.D.
Cornell, S.
Organic Nitrogen in Precipitation: Real Problem or Sampling Artefact?
title Organic Nitrogen in Precipitation: Real Problem or Sampling Artefact?
title_full Organic Nitrogen in Precipitation: Real Problem or Sampling Artefact?
title_fullStr Organic Nitrogen in Precipitation: Real Problem or Sampling Artefact?
title_full_unstemmed Organic Nitrogen in Precipitation: Real Problem or Sampling Artefact?
title_short Organic Nitrogen in Precipitation: Real Problem or Sampling Artefact?
title_sort organic nitrogen in precipitation: real problem or sampling artefact?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6084209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12805792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.278
work_keys_str_mv AT capejn organicnitrogeninprecipitationrealproblemorsamplingartefact
AT kirikaa organicnitrogeninprecipitationrealproblemorsamplingartefact
AT rowlandap organicnitrogeninprecipitationrealproblemorsamplingartefact
AT wilsondr organicnitrogeninprecipitationrealproblemorsamplingartefact
AT jickellstd organicnitrogeninprecipitationrealproblemorsamplingartefact
AT cornells organicnitrogeninprecipitationrealproblemorsamplingartefact