Cargando…
Analysis of the effects of noise, DWI sampling, and value of assumed parameters in diffusion MRI models
PURPOSE: This study was a systematic evaluation across different and prominent diffusion MRI models to better understand the ways in which scalar metrics are influenced by experimental factors, including experimental design (diffusion‐weighted imaging [DWI] sampling) and noise. METHODS: Four diffusi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6084345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28090658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26575 |
_version_ | 1783346159589261312 |
---|---|
author | Hutchinson, Elizabeth B. Avram, Alexandru V. Irfanoglu, M. Okan Koay, C. Guan Barnett, Alan S. Komlosh, Michal E. Özarslan, Evren Schwerin, Susan C. Juliano, Sharon L. Pierpaoli, Carlo |
author_facet | Hutchinson, Elizabeth B. Avram, Alexandru V. Irfanoglu, M. Okan Koay, C. Guan Barnett, Alan S. Komlosh, Michal E. Özarslan, Evren Schwerin, Susan C. Juliano, Sharon L. Pierpaoli, Carlo |
author_sort | Hutchinson, Elizabeth B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study was a systematic evaluation across different and prominent diffusion MRI models to better understand the ways in which scalar metrics are influenced by experimental factors, including experimental design (diffusion‐weighted imaging [DWI] sampling) and noise. METHODS: Four diffusion MRI models—diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), mean apparent propagator MRI (MAP‐MRI), and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI)—were evaluated by comparing maps and histogram values of the scalar metrics generated using DWI datasets obtained in fixed mouse brain with different noise levels and DWI sampling complexity. Additionally, models were fit with different input parameters or constraints to examine the consequences of model fitting procedures. RESULTS: Experimental factors affected all models and metrics to varying degrees. Model complexity influenced sensitivity to DWI sampling and noise, especially for metrics reporting non‐Gaussian information. DKI metrics were highly susceptible to noise and experimental design. The influence of fixed parameter selection for the NODDI model was found to be considerable, as was the impact of initial tensor fitting in the MAP‐MRI model. CONCLUSION: Across DTI, DKI, MAP‐MRI, and NODDI, a wide range of dependence on experimental factors was observed that elucidate principles and practical implications for advanced diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 78:1767–1780, 2017. © 2017 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6084345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60843452018-08-16 Analysis of the effects of noise, DWI sampling, and value of assumed parameters in diffusion MRI models Hutchinson, Elizabeth B. Avram, Alexandru V. Irfanoglu, M. Okan Koay, C. Guan Barnett, Alan S. Komlosh, Michal E. Özarslan, Evren Schwerin, Susan C. Juliano, Sharon L. Pierpaoli, Carlo Magn Reson Med Full Papers—Imaging Methodology PURPOSE: This study was a systematic evaluation across different and prominent diffusion MRI models to better understand the ways in which scalar metrics are influenced by experimental factors, including experimental design (diffusion‐weighted imaging [DWI] sampling) and noise. METHODS: Four diffusion MRI models—diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), mean apparent propagator MRI (MAP‐MRI), and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI)—were evaluated by comparing maps and histogram values of the scalar metrics generated using DWI datasets obtained in fixed mouse brain with different noise levels and DWI sampling complexity. Additionally, models were fit with different input parameters or constraints to examine the consequences of model fitting procedures. RESULTS: Experimental factors affected all models and metrics to varying degrees. Model complexity influenced sensitivity to DWI sampling and noise, especially for metrics reporting non‐Gaussian information. DKI metrics were highly susceptible to noise and experimental design. The influence of fixed parameter selection for the NODDI model was found to be considerable, as was the impact of initial tensor fitting in the MAP‐MRI model. CONCLUSION: Across DTI, DKI, MAP‐MRI, and NODDI, a wide range of dependence on experimental factors was observed that elucidate principles and practical implications for advanced diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 78:1767–1780, 2017. © 2017 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-01-16 2017-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6084345/ /pubmed/28090658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26575 Text en © 2017 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Full Papers—Imaging Methodology Hutchinson, Elizabeth B. Avram, Alexandru V. Irfanoglu, M. Okan Koay, C. Guan Barnett, Alan S. Komlosh, Michal E. Özarslan, Evren Schwerin, Susan C. Juliano, Sharon L. Pierpaoli, Carlo Analysis of the effects of noise, DWI sampling, and value of assumed parameters in diffusion MRI models |
title | Analysis of the effects of noise, DWI sampling, and value of assumed parameters in diffusion MRI models |
title_full | Analysis of the effects of noise, DWI sampling, and value of assumed parameters in diffusion MRI models |
title_fullStr | Analysis of the effects of noise, DWI sampling, and value of assumed parameters in diffusion MRI models |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of the effects of noise, DWI sampling, and value of assumed parameters in diffusion MRI models |
title_short | Analysis of the effects of noise, DWI sampling, and value of assumed parameters in diffusion MRI models |
title_sort | analysis of the effects of noise, dwi sampling, and value of assumed parameters in diffusion mri models |
topic | Full Papers—Imaging Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6084345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28090658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26575 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hutchinsonelizabethb analysisoftheeffectsofnoisedwisamplingandvalueofassumedparametersindiffusionmrimodels AT avramalexandruv analysisoftheeffectsofnoisedwisamplingandvalueofassumedparametersindiffusionmrimodels AT irfanoglumokan analysisoftheeffectsofnoisedwisamplingandvalueofassumedparametersindiffusionmrimodels AT koaycguan analysisoftheeffectsofnoisedwisamplingandvalueofassumedparametersindiffusionmrimodels AT barnettalans analysisoftheeffectsofnoisedwisamplingandvalueofassumedparametersindiffusionmrimodels AT komloshmichale analysisoftheeffectsofnoisedwisamplingandvalueofassumedparametersindiffusionmrimodels AT ozarslanevren analysisoftheeffectsofnoisedwisamplingandvalueofassumedparametersindiffusionmrimodels AT schwerinsusanc analysisoftheeffectsofnoisedwisamplingandvalueofassumedparametersindiffusionmrimodels AT julianosharonl analysisoftheeffectsofnoisedwisamplingandvalueofassumedparametersindiffusionmrimodels AT pierpaolicarlo analysisoftheeffectsofnoisedwisamplingandvalueofassumedparametersindiffusionmrimodels |