Cargando…

Analysis of the effects of noise, DWI sampling, and value of assumed parameters in diffusion MRI models

PURPOSE: This study was a systematic evaluation across different and prominent diffusion MRI models to better understand the ways in which scalar metrics are influenced by experimental factors, including experimental design (diffusion‐weighted imaging [DWI] sampling) and noise. METHODS: Four diffusi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hutchinson, Elizabeth B., Avram, Alexandru V., Irfanoglu, M. Okan, Koay, C. Guan, Barnett, Alan S., Komlosh, Michal E., Özarslan, Evren, Schwerin, Susan C., Juliano, Sharon L., Pierpaoli, Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6084345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28090658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26575
_version_ 1783346159589261312
author Hutchinson, Elizabeth B.
Avram, Alexandru V.
Irfanoglu, M. Okan
Koay, C. Guan
Barnett, Alan S.
Komlosh, Michal E.
Özarslan, Evren
Schwerin, Susan C.
Juliano, Sharon L.
Pierpaoli, Carlo
author_facet Hutchinson, Elizabeth B.
Avram, Alexandru V.
Irfanoglu, M. Okan
Koay, C. Guan
Barnett, Alan S.
Komlosh, Michal E.
Özarslan, Evren
Schwerin, Susan C.
Juliano, Sharon L.
Pierpaoli, Carlo
author_sort Hutchinson, Elizabeth B.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study was a systematic evaluation across different and prominent diffusion MRI models to better understand the ways in which scalar metrics are influenced by experimental factors, including experimental design (diffusion‐weighted imaging [DWI] sampling) and noise. METHODS: Four diffusion MRI models—diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), mean apparent propagator MRI (MAP‐MRI), and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI)—were evaluated by comparing maps and histogram values of the scalar metrics generated using DWI datasets obtained in fixed mouse brain with different noise levels and DWI sampling complexity. Additionally, models were fit with different input parameters or constraints to examine the consequences of model fitting procedures. RESULTS: Experimental factors affected all models and metrics to varying degrees. Model complexity influenced sensitivity to DWI sampling and noise, especially for metrics reporting non‐Gaussian information. DKI metrics were highly susceptible to noise and experimental design. The influence of fixed parameter selection for the NODDI model was found to be considerable, as was the impact of initial tensor fitting in the MAP‐MRI model. CONCLUSION: Across DTI, DKI, MAP‐MRI, and NODDI, a wide range of dependence on experimental factors was observed that elucidate principles and practical implications for advanced diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 78:1767–1780, 2017. © 2017 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6084345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60843452018-08-16 Analysis of the effects of noise, DWI sampling, and value of assumed parameters in diffusion MRI models Hutchinson, Elizabeth B. Avram, Alexandru V. Irfanoglu, M. Okan Koay, C. Guan Barnett, Alan S. Komlosh, Michal E. Özarslan, Evren Schwerin, Susan C. Juliano, Sharon L. Pierpaoli, Carlo Magn Reson Med Full Papers—Imaging Methodology PURPOSE: This study was a systematic evaluation across different and prominent diffusion MRI models to better understand the ways in which scalar metrics are influenced by experimental factors, including experimental design (diffusion‐weighted imaging [DWI] sampling) and noise. METHODS: Four diffusion MRI models—diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), mean apparent propagator MRI (MAP‐MRI), and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI)—were evaluated by comparing maps and histogram values of the scalar metrics generated using DWI datasets obtained in fixed mouse brain with different noise levels and DWI sampling complexity. Additionally, models were fit with different input parameters or constraints to examine the consequences of model fitting procedures. RESULTS: Experimental factors affected all models and metrics to varying degrees. Model complexity influenced sensitivity to DWI sampling and noise, especially for metrics reporting non‐Gaussian information. DKI metrics were highly susceptible to noise and experimental design. The influence of fixed parameter selection for the NODDI model was found to be considerable, as was the impact of initial tensor fitting in the MAP‐MRI model. CONCLUSION: Across DTI, DKI, MAP‐MRI, and NODDI, a wide range of dependence on experimental factors was observed that elucidate principles and practical implications for advanced diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 78:1767–1780, 2017. © 2017 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-01-16 2017-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6084345/ /pubmed/28090658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26575 Text en © 2017 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Full Papers—Imaging Methodology
Hutchinson, Elizabeth B.
Avram, Alexandru V.
Irfanoglu, M. Okan
Koay, C. Guan
Barnett, Alan S.
Komlosh, Michal E.
Özarslan, Evren
Schwerin, Susan C.
Juliano, Sharon L.
Pierpaoli, Carlo
Analysis of the effects of noise, DWI sampling, and value of assumed parameters in diffusion MRI models
title Analysis of the effects of noise, DWI sampling, and value of assumed parameters in diffusion MRI models
title_full Analysis of the effects of noise, DWI sampling, and value of assumed parameters in diffusion MRI models
title_fullStr Analysis of the effects of noise, DWI sampling, and value of assumed parameters in diffusion MRI models
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the effects of noise, DWI sampling, and value of assumed parameters in diffusion MRI models
title_short Analysis of the effects of noise, DWI sampling, and value of assumed parameters in diffusion MRI models
title_sort analysis of the effects of noise, dwi sampling, and value of assumed parameters in diffusion mri models
topic Full Papers—Imaging Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6084345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28090658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26575
work_keys_str_mv AT hutchinsonelizabethb analysisoftheeffectsofnoisedwisamplingandvalueofassumedparametersindiffusionmrimodels
AT avramalexandruv analysisoftheeffectsofnoisedwisamplingandvalueofassumedparametersindiffusionmrimodels
AT irfanoglumokan analysisoftheeffectsofnoisedwisamplingandvalueofassumedparametersindiffusionmrimodels
AT koaycguan analysisoftheeffectsofnoisedwisamplingandvalueofassumedparametersindiffusionmrimodels
AT barnettalans analysisoftheeffectsofnoisedwisamplingandvalueofassumedparametersindiffusionmrimodels
AT komloshmichale analysisoftheeffectsofnoisedwisamplingandvalueofassumedparametersindiffusionmrimodels
AT ozarslanevren analysisoftheeffectsofnoisedwisamplingandvalueofassumedparametersindiffusionmrimodels
AT schwerinsusanc analysisoftheeffectsofnoisedwisamplingandvalueofassumedparametersindiffusionmrimodels
AT julianosharonl analysisoftheeffectsofnoisedwisamplingandvalueofassumedparametersindiffusionmrimodels
AT pierpaolicarlo analysisoftheeffectsofnoisedwisamplingandvalueofassumedparametersindiffusionmrimodels