Cargando…

Concentration and quantification of somatic and F+ coliphages from recreational waters

Somatic and F+ coliphages are promising alternative fecal indicators, but current detection methods are hindered by lower levels of coliphages in surface waters compared to traditional bacterial fecal indicators. We evaluated the ability of dead-end hollow fiber ultrafiltration (D-HFUF) and single a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McMinn, Brian R., Huff, Emma M., Rhodes, Eric R., Korajkic, Asja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6084438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28843788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.08.006
_version_ 1783346177096286208
author McMinn, Brian R.
Huff, Emma M.
Rhodes, Eric R.
Korajkic, Asja
author_facet McMinn, Brian R.
Huff, Emma M.
Rhodes, Eric R.
Korajkic, Asja
author_sort McMinn, Brian R.
collection PubMed
description Somatic and F+ coliphages are promising alternative fecal indicators, but current detection methods are hindered by lower levels of coliphages in surface waters compared to traditional bacterial fecal indicators. We evaluated the ability of dead-end hollow fiber ultrafiltration (D-HFUF) and single agar layer (SAL) procedure to concentrate and enumerate coliphages from 1L and 10L volumes of ambient surface waters (lake, river, marine), river water with varying turbidities (3.74–118.7 NTU), and a simulated combined sewer overflow (CSO) event. Percentage recoveries for surface waters were 40–79% (somatic) and 35–94% (F + ). The method performed equally well in all three matrices at 1L volumes, but percent recoveries were significantly higher in marine waters at 10L volumes when compared to freshwater. Percent recoveries at 1L and 10L were similar, except in river water where recoveries were significantly lower at higher volume. In highly turbid waters, D-HFUF-SAL had a recovery range of 25–77% (somatic) and 21–80% (F + ). The method produced detectable levels of coliphages in diluted wastewater and in unspiked surface waters, emphasizing its applicability to CSO events and highlighting its utility in recovery of low coliphage densities from surface waters. Thus D-HFUF-SAL is a good candidate method for routine water quality monitoring of coliphages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6084438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60844382018-08-09 Concentration and quantification of somatic and F+ coliphages from recreational waters McMinn, Brian R. Huff, Emma M. Rhodes, Eric R. Korajkic, Asja J Virol Methods Article Somatic and F+ coliphages are promising alternative fecal indicators, but current detection methods are hindered by lower levels of coliphages in surface waters compared to traditional bacterial fecal indicators. We evaluated the ability of dead-end hollow fiber ultrafiltration (D-HFUF) and single agar layer (SAL) procedure to concentrate and enumerate coliphages from 1L and 10L volumes of ambient surface waters (lake, river, marine), river water with varying turbidities (3.74–118.7 NTU), and a simulated combined sewer overflow (CSO) event. Percentage recoveries for surface waters were 40–79% (somatic) and 35–94% (F + ). The method performed equally well in all three matrices at 1L volumes, but percent recoveries were significantly higher in marine waters at 10L volumes when compared to freshwater. Percent recoveries at 1L and 10L were similar, except in river water where recoveries were significantly lower at higher volume. In highly turbid waters, D-HFUF-SAL had a recovery range of 25–77% (somatic) and 21–80% (F + ). The method produced detectable levels of coliphages in diluted wastewater and in unspiked surface waters, emphasizing its applicability to CSO events and highlighting its utility in recovery of low coliphage densities from surface waters. Thus D-HFUF-SAL is a good candidate method for routine water quality monitoring of coliphages. 2017-08-24 2017-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6084438/ /pubmed/28843788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.08.006 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
McMinn, Brian R.
Huff, Emma M.
Rhodes, Eric R.
Korajkic, Asja
Concentration and quantification of somatic and F+ coliphages from recreational waters
title Concentration and quantification of somatic and F+ coliphages from recreational waters
title_full Concentration and quantification of somatic and F+ coliphages from recreational waters
title_fullStr Concentration and quantification of somatic and F+ coliphages from recreational waters
title_full_unstemmed Concentration and quantification of somatic and F+ coliphages from recreational waters
title_short Concentration and quantification of somatic and F+ coliphages from recreational waters
title_sort concentration and quantification of somatic and f+ coliphages from recreational waters
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6084438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28843788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.08.006
work_keys_str_mv AT mcminnbrianr concentrationandquantificationofsomaticandfcoliphagesfromrecreationalwaters
AT huffemmam concentrationandquantificationofsomaticandfcoliphagesfromrecreationalwaters
AT rhodesericr concentrationandquantificationofsomaticandfcoliphagesfromrecreationalwaters
AT korajkicasja concentrationandquantificationofsomaticandfcoliphagesfromrecreationalwaters