Cargando…

Spatial Distribution of Tropospheric Ozone in National Parks of California: Interpretation of Passive-Sampler Data

The National Park Service (NPS) has tested and used passive ozone samplers for several years to get baseline values for parks and to determine the spatial variability within parks. Experience has shown that the Ogawa passive samplers can provide ±10% accuracy when used with a quality assurance progr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ray, John D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6084721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12806065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.83
_version_ 1783346218169008128
author Ray, John D.
author_facet Ray, John D.
author_sort Ray, John D.
collection PubMed
description The National Park Service (NPS) has tested and used passive ozone samplers for several years to get baseline values for parks and to determine the spatial variability within parks. Experience has shown that the Ogawa passive samplers can provide ±10% accuracy when used with a quality assurance program consisting of blanks, duplicates, collocated instrumentation, and a standard operating procedure that carefully guides site operators. Although the passive device does not meet EPA criteria as a certified method (mainly, that hourly values be measured), it does provide seasonal summed values of ozone. The seasonal ozone concentrations from the passive devices can be compared to other monitoring to determine baseline values, trends, and spatial variations. This point is illustrated with some kriged interpolation maps of ozone statistics. Passive ozone samplers were used to get elevational gradients and spatial distributions of ozone within a park. This was done in varying degrees at Mount Rainier, Olympic, Sequoia–Kings Canyon, Yosemite, Joshua Tree, Rocky Mountain, and Great Smoky Mountains national parks. The ozone has been found to vary by factors of 2 and 3 within a park when average ozone is compared between locations. Specific examples of the spatial distributions of ozone in three parks within California are given using interpolation maps. Positive aspects and limitations of the passive sampling approach are presented.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6084721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60847212018-08-26 Spatial Distribution of Tropospheric Ozone in National Parks of California: Interpretation of Passive-Sampler Data Ray, John D. ScientificWorldJournal Research Article The National Park Service (NPS) has tested and used passive ozone samplers for several years to get baseline values for parks and to determine the spatial variability within parks. Experience has shown that the Ogawa passive samplers can provide ±10% accuracy when used with a quality assurance program consisting of blanks, duplicates, collocated instrumentation, and a standard operating procedure that carefully guides site operators. Although the passive device does not meet EPA criteria as a certified method (mainly, that hourly values be measured), it does provide seasonal summed values of ozone. The seasonal ozone concentrations from the passive devices can be compared to other monitoring to determine baseline values, trends, and spatial variations. This point is illustrated with some kriged interpolation maps of ozone statistics. Passive ozone samplers were used to get elevational gradients and spatial distributions of ozone within a park. This was done in varying degrees at Mount Rainier, Olympic, Sequoia–Kings Canyon, Yosemite, Joshua Tree, Rocky Mountain, and Great Smoky Mountains national parks. The ozone has been found to vary by factors of 2 and 3 within a park when average ozone is compared between locations. Specific examples of the spatial distributions of ozone in three parks within California are given using interpolation maps. Positive aspects and limitations of the passive sampling approach are presented. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2001-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6084721/ /pubmed/12806065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.83 Text en Copyright © 2001 John D. Ray. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ray, John D.
Spatial Distribution of Tropospheric Ozone in National Parks of California: Interpretation of Passive-Sampler Data
title Spatial Distribution of Tropospheric Ozone in National Parks of California: Interpretation of Passive-Sampler Data
title_full Spatial Distribution of Tropospheric Ozone in National Parks of California: Interpretation of Passive-Sampler Data
title_fullStr Spatial Distribution of Tropospheric Ozone in National Parks of California: Interpretation of Passive-Sampler Data
title_full_unstemmed Spatial Distribution of Tropospheric Ozone in National Parks of California: Interpretation of Passive-Sampler Data
title_short Spatial Distribution of Tropospheric Ozone in National Parks of California: Interpretation of Passive-Sampler Data
title_sort spatial distribution of tropospheric ozone in national parks of california: interpretation of passive-sampler data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6084721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12806065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.83
work_keys_str_mv AT rayjohnd spatialdistributionoftroposphericozoneinnationalparksofcaliforniainterpretationofpassivesamplerdata