Cargando…
Spatial Distribution of Tropospheric Ozone in National Parks of California: Interpretation of Passive-Sampler Data
The National Park Service (NPS) has tested and used passive ozone samplers for several years to get baseline values for parks and to determine the spatial variability within parks. Experience has shown that the Ogawa passive samplers can provide ±10% accuracy when used with a quality assurance progr...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
2001
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6084721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12806065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.83 |
_version_ | 1783346218169008128 |
---|---|
author | Ray, John D. |
author_facet | Ray, John D. |
author_sort | Ray, John D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The National Park Service (NPS) has tested and used passive ozone samplers for several years to get baseline values for parks and to determine the spatial variability within parks. Experience has shown that the Ogawa passive samplers can provide ±10% accuracy when used with a quality assurance program consisting of blanks, duplicates, collocated instrumentation, and a standard operating procedure that carefully guides site operators. Although the passive device does not meet EPA criteria as a certified method (mainly, that hourly values be measured), it does provide seasonal summed values of ozone. The seasonal ozone concentrations from the passive devices can be compared to other monitoring to determine baseline values, trends, and spatial variations. This point is illustrated with some kriged interpolation maps of ozone statistics. Passive ozone samplers were used to get elevational gradients and spatial distributions of ozone within a park. This was done in varying degrees at Mount Rainier, Olympic, Sequoia–Kings Canyon, Yosemite, Joshua Tree, Rocky Mountain, and Great Smoky Mountains national parks. The ozone has been found to vary by factors of 2 and 3 within a park when average ozone is compared between locations. Specific examples of the spatial distributions of ozone in three parks within California are given using interpolation maps. Positive aspects and limitations of the passive sampling approach are presented. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6084721 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2001 |
publisher | TheScientificWorldJOURNAL |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60847212018-08-26 Spatial Distribution of Tropospheric Ozone in National Parks of California: Interpretation of Passive-Sampler Data Ray, John D. ScientificWorldJournal Research Article The National Park Service (NPS) has tested and used passive ozone samplers for several years to get baseline values for parks and to determine the spatial variability within parks. Experience has shown that the Ogawa passive samplers can provide ±10% accuracy when used with a quality assurance program consisting of blanks, duplicates, collocated instrumentation, and a standard operating procedure that carefully guides site operators. Although the passive device does not meet EPA criteria as a certified method (mainly, that hourly values be measured), it does provide seasonal summed values of ozone. The seasonal ozone concentrations from the passive devices can be compared to other monitoring to determine baseline values, trends, and spatial variations. This point is illustrated with some kriged interpolation maps of ozone statistics. Passive ozone samplers were used to get elevational gradients and spatial distributions of ozone within a park. This was done in varying degrees at Mount Rainier, Olympic, Sequoia–Kings Canyon, Yosemite, Joshua Tree, Rocky Mountain, and Great Smoky Mountains national parks. The ozone has been found to vary by factors of 2 and 3 within a park when average ozone is compared between locations. Specific examples of the spatial distributions of ozone in three parks within California are given using interpolation maps. Positive aspects and limitations of the passive sampling approach are presented. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2001-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6084721/ /pubmed/12806065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.83 Text en Copyright © 2001 John D. Ray. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ray, John D. Spatial Distribution of Tropospheric Ozone in National Parks of California: Interpretation of Passive-Sampler Data |
title | Spatial Distribution of Tropospheric Ozone in National Parks of California: Interpretation of Passive-Sampler Data |
title_full | Spatial Distribution of Tropospheric Ozone in National Parks of California: Interpretation of Passive-Sampler Data |
title_fullStr | Spatial Distribution of Tropospheric Ozone in National Parks of California: Interpretation of Passive-Sampler Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Spatial Distribution of Tropospheric Ozone in National Parks of California: Interpretation of Passive-Sampler Data |
title_short | Spatial Distribution of Tropospheric Ozone in National Parks of California: Interpretation of Passive-Sampler Data |
title_sort | spatial distribution of tropospheric ozone in national parks of california: interpretation of passive-sampler data |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6084721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12806065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.83 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rayjohnd spatialdistributionoftroposphericozoneinnationalparksofcaliforniainterpretationofpassivesamplerdata |