Cargando…

Development and validation of anthropometric equations to estimate body composition in adult women

OBJECTIVE: To develop anthropometric equations to predict body fat percentage (BF%). METHODS: In 151 women (aged 18-59) body weight, height, eight- skinfold thickness (STs), six- circumferences (CIs), and BF% by hydrodensitometry were measured. Subjects data were randomly divided in two groups, equa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aristizabal, Juan C., Estrada-Restrepo, Alejandro, Giraldo García, Argenis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Universidad del Valle 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6084924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30104807
http://dx.doi.org/10.25100/cm.v49i2.3643
_version_ 1783346250279550976
author Aristizabal, Juan C.
Estrada-Restrepo, Alejandro
Giraldo García, Argenis
author_facet Aristizabal, Juan C.
Estrada-Restrepo, Alejandro
Giraldo García, Argenis
author_sort Aristizabal, Juan C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop anthropometric equations to predict body fat percentage (BF%). METHODS: In 151 women (aged 18-59) body weight, height, eight- skinfold thickness (STs), six- circumferences (CIs), and BF% by hydrodensitometry were measured. Subjects data were randomly divided in two groups, equation-building group (n= 106) and validation group (n= 45). The equation-building group was used to run linear regression models using anthropometric measurements as predictors to find the best prediction equations of the BF%. The validation group was used to compare the performance of the new equations with those of Durnin-Womersley, Jackson-Pollock and Ramirez-Torun. RESULTS: There were two preferred equations: Equation 1= 11.76 + (0.324 x tricipital ST) + (0.133 x calf ST) + (0.347 x abdomen CI) + (0.068 x age) - (0.135 x height) and Equation 2= 11.37 + (0.404 x tricipital ST) + (0.153 x axilar ST) + (0.264 x abdomen CI) + (0.069 x age) - (0.099 x height). There were no significant differences in BF% obtained by hydrodensitometry (31.5 ±5.3) and Equation 1 (31.0 ±4.0) and Equation 2 (31.2 ±4.0). The BF% estimated by Durning-Womersley (35.8 ±4.0), Jackson-Pollock (26.5 ±5.4) and Ramirez-Torun (32.6 ±4.8) differed from hydrodensitometry (p <0.05). The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was high between hydrodensitometry and Equation 1 (ICC= 0.77), Equation 2 (ICC= 0.76), and Ramirez-Torun equation (ICC= 0.75). The ICC was low between hydrodensitometry and Durnin-Womersley (ICC= 0.51) and Jackson-Pollock (ICC= 0.53) equations. CONCLUSION: The new Equations-1 and 2, performed better than the commonly used anthropometric equations to predict BF% in adult women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6084924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Universidad del Valle
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60849242018-08-13 Development and validation of anthropometric equations to estimate body composition in adult women Aristizabal, Juan C. Estrada-Restrepo, Alejandro Giraldo García, Argenis Colomb Med (Cali) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To develop anthropometric equations to predict body fat percentage (BF%). METHODS: In 151 women (aged 18-59) body weight, height, eight- skinfold thickness (STs), six- circumferences (CIs), and BF% by hydrodensitometry were measured. Subjects data were randomly divided in two groups, equation-building group (n= 106) and validation group (n= 45). The equation-building group was used to run linear regression models using anthropometric measurements as predictors to find the best prediction equations of the BF%. The validation group was used to compare the performance of the new equations with those of Durnin-Womersley, Jackson-Pollock and Ramirez-Torun. RESULTS: There were two preferred equations: Equation 1= 11.76 + (0.324 x tricipital ST) + (0.133 x calf ST) + (0.347 x abdomen CI) + (0.068 x age) - (0.135 x height) and Equation 2= 11.37 + (0.404 x tricipital ST) + (0.153 x axilar ST) + (0.264 x abdomen CI) + (0.069 x age) - (0.099 x height). There were no significant differences in BF% obtained by hydrodensitometry (31.5 ±5.3) and Equation 1 (31.0 ±4.0) and Equation 2 (31.2 ±4.0). The BF% estimated by Durning-Womersley (35.8 ±4.0), Jackson-Pollock (26.5 ±5.4) and Ramirez-Torun (32.6 ±4.8) differed from hydrodensitometry (p <0.05). The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was high between hydrodensitometry and Equation 1 (ICC= 0.77), Equation 2 (ICC= 0.76), and Ramirez-Torun equation (ICC= 0.75). The ICC was low between hydrodensitometry and Durnin-Womersley (ICC= 0.51) and Jackson-Pollock (ICC= 0.53) equations. CONCLUSION: The new Equations-1 and 2, performed better than the commonly used anthropometric equations to predict BF% in adult women. Universidad del Valle 2018-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6084924/ /pubmed/30104807 http://dx.doi.org/10.25100/cm.v49i2.3643 Text en Copyright © 2018 Universidad del Valle This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Aristizabal, Juan C.
Estrada-Restrepo, Alejandro
Giraldo García, Argenis
Development and validation of anthropometric equations to estimate body composition in adult women
title Development and validation of anthropometric equations to estimate body composition in adult women
title_full Development and validation of anthropometric equations to estimate body composition in adult women
title_fullStr Development and validation of anthropometric equations to estimate body composition in adult women
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of anthropometric equations to estimate body composition in adult women
title_short Development and validation of anthropometric equations to estimate body composition in adult women
title_sort development and validation of anthropometric equations to estimate body composition in adult women
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6084924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30104807
http://dx.doi.org/10.25100/cm.v49i2.3643
work_keys_str_mv AT aristizabaljuanc developmentandvalidationofanthropometricequationstoestimatebodycompositioninadultwomen
AT estradarestrepoalejandro developmentandvalidationofanthropometricequationstoestimatebodycompositioninadultwomen
AT giraldogarciaargenis developmentandvalidationofanthropometricequationstoestimatebodycompositioninadultwomen