Cargando…
The topography of rods, cones and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in the retinas of a nocturnal (Micaelamys namaquensis) and a diurnal (Rhabdomys pumilio) rodent
We used immunocytochemistry to determine the presence and topographical density distributions of rods, cones, and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) in the four-striped field mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio) and the Namaqua rock mouse (Micaelamys namaquensis). Both species possess...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6084985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30092025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202106 |
_version_ | 1783346264944934912 |
---|---|
author | van der Merwe, Ingrid Lukáts, Ákos Bláhová, Veronika Oosthuizen, Maria K. Bennett, Nigel C. Němec, Pavel |
author_facet | van der Merwe, Ingrid Lukáts, Ákos Bláhová, Veronika Oosthuizen, Maria K. Bennett, Nigel C. Němec, Pavel |
author_sort | van der Merwe, Ingrid |
collection | PubMed |
description | We used immunocytochemistry to determine the presence and topographical density distributions of rods, cones, and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) in the four-striped field mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio) and the Namaqua rock mouse (Micaelamys namaquensis). Both species possessed duplex retinas that were rod dominated. In R. pumilio, the density of both cones and rods were high (cone to rod ratio: 1:1.23) and reflected the species’ fundamentally diurnal, but largely crepuscular lifestyle. Similarly, the ratio of cones to rods in M. namaquensis (1:12.4) reflected its nocturnal lifestyle. Similar rod density peaks were observed (R. pumilio: ~84467/mm(2); M. namaquensis: ~81088/mm(2)), but a density gradient yielded higher values in the central (~56618/mm(2)) rather than in the peripheral retinal region (~32689/mm(2)) in R. pumilio. Two separate cone types (S-cones and M/L-cones) were identified implying dichromatic color vision in the study species. In M. namaquensis, both cone populations showed a centro-peripheral density gradient and a consistent S- to M/L-cone ratio (~1:7.8). In R. pumilio, S cones showed a centro-peripheral gradient (S- to M/L-cone ratio; central: 1:7.8; peripheral: 1:6.8) which appeared to form a visual streak, and a specialized area of M/L-cones (S- to M/L-cone ratio: 1:15) was observed inferior to the optic nerve. The number of photoreceptors per linear degree of visual angle, estimated from peak photoreceptor densities and eye size, were four cones and 15 rods per degree in M. namaquensis and 11 cones and 12 rods per degree in R. pumilio. Thus, in nocturnal M. namaquensis rods provide much finer image sampling than cones, whereas in diurnal/crepuscular R. pumilio both photoreceptor types provide fine image sampling. IpRGCs were comparably sparse in R. pumilio (total = 1012) and M. namaquensis (total = 862), but were homogeneously distributed in M. namaquensis and densest in the dorso-nasal quadrant in R. pumilio. The adaptive significance of the latter needs further investigation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6084985 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60849852018-08-18 The topography of rods, cones and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in the retinas of a nocturnal (Micaelamys namaquensis) and a diurnal (Rhabdomys pumilio) rodent van der Merwe, Ingrid Lukáts, Ákos Bláhová, Veronika Oosthuizen, Maria K. Bennett, Nigel C. Němec, Pavel PLoS One Research Article We used immunocytochemistry to determine the presence and topographical density distributions of rods, cones, and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) in the four-striped field mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio) and the Namaqua rock mouse (Micaelamys namaquensis). Both species possessed duplex retinas that were rod dominated. In R. pumilio, the density of both cones and rods were high (cone to rod ratio: 1:1.23) and reflected the species’ fundamentally diurnal, but largely crepuscular lifestyle. Similarly, the ratio of cones to rods in M. namaquensis (1:12.4) reflected its nocturnal lifestyle. Similar rod density peaks were observed (R. pumilio: ~84467/mm(2); M. namaquensis: ~81088/mm(2)), but a density gradient yielded higher values in the central (~56618/mm(2)) rather than in the peripheral retinal region (~32689/mm(2)) in R. pumilio. Two separate cone types (S-cones and M/L-cones) were identified implying dichromatic color vision in the study species. In M. namaquensis, both cone populations showed a centro-peripheral density gradient and a consistent S- to M/L-cone ratio (~1:7.8). In R. pumilio, S cones showed a centro-peripheral gradient (S- to M/L-cone ratio; central: 1:7.8; peripheral: 1:6.8) which appeared to form a visual streak, and a specialized area of M/L-cones (S- to M/L-cone ratio: 1:15) was observed inferior to the optic nerve. The number of photoreceptors per linear degree of visual angle, estimated from peak photoreceptor densities and eye size, were four cones and 15 rods per degree in M. namaquensis and 11 cones and 12 rods per degree in R. pumilio. Thus, in nocturnal M. namaquensis rods provide much finer image sampling than cones, whereas in diurnal/crepuscular R. pumilio both photoreceptor types provide fine image sampling. IpRGCs were comparably sparse in R. pumilio (total = 1012) and M. namaquensis (total = 862), but were homogeneously distributed in M. namaquensis and densest in the dorso-nasal quadrant in R. pumilio. The adaptive significance of the latter needs further investigation. Public Library of Science 2018-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6084985/ /pubmed/30092025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202106 Text en © 2018 van der Merwe et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van der Merwe, Ingrid Lukáts, Ákos Bláhová, Veronika Oosthuizen, Maria K. Bennett, Nigel C. Němec, Pavel The topography of rods, cones and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in the retinas of a nocturnal (Micaelamys namaquensis) and a diurnal (Rhabdomys pumilio) rodent |
title | The topography of rods, cones and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in the retinas of a nocturnal (Micaelamys namaquensis) and a diurnal (Rhabdomys pumilio) rodent |
title_full | The topography of rods, cones and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in the retinas of a nocturnal (Micaelamys namaquensis) and a diurnal (Rhabdomys pumilio) rodent |
title_fullStr | The topography of rods, cones and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in the retinas of a nocturnal (Micaelamys namaquensis) and a diurnal (Rhabdomys pumilio) rodent |
title_full_unstemmed | The topography of rods, cones and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in the retinas of a nocturnal (Micaelamys namaquensis) and a diurnal (Rhabdomys pumilio) rodent |
title_short | The topography of rods, cones and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in the retinas of a nocturnal (Micaelamys namaquensis) and a diurnal (Rhabdomys pumilio) rodent |
title_sort | topography of rods, cones and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in the retinas of a nocturnal (micaelamys namaquensis) and a diurnal (rhabdomys pumilio) rodent |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6084985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30092025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202106 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandermerweingrid thetopographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent AT lukatsakos thetopographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent AT blahovaveronika thetopographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent AT oosthuizenmariak thetopographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent AT bennettnigelc thetopographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent AT nemecpavel thetopographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent AT vandermerweingrid topographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent AT lukatsakos topographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent AT blahovaveronika topographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent AT oosthuizenmariak topographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent AT bennettnigelc topographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent AT nemecpavel topographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent |