Cargando…

The topography of rods, cones and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in the retinas of a nocturnal (Micaelamys namaquensis) and a diurnal (Rhabdomys pumilio) rodent

We used immunocytochemistry to determine the presence and topographical density distributions of rods, cones, and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) in the four-striped field mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio) and the Namaqua rock mouse (Micaelamys namaquensis). Both species possess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Merwe, Ingrid, Lukáts, Ákos, Bláhová, Veronika, Oosthuizen, Maria K., Bennett, Nigel C., Němec, Pavel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6084985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30092025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202106
_version_ 1783346264944934912
author van der Merwe, Ingrid
Lukáts, Ákos
Bláhová, Veronika
Oosthuizen, Maria K.
Bennett, Nigel C.
Němec, Pavel
author_facet van der Merwe, Ingrid
Lukáts, Ákos
Bláhová, Veronika
Oosthuizen, Maria K.
Bennett, Nigel C.
Němec, Pavel
author_sort van der Merwe, Ingrid
collection PubMed
description We used immunocytochemistry to determine the presence and topographical density distributions of rods, cones, and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) in the four-striped field mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio) and the Namaqua rock mouse (Micaelamys namaquensis). Both species possessed duplex retinas that were rod dominated. In R. pumilio, the density of both cones and rods were high (cone to rod ratio: 1:1.23) and reflected the species’ fundamentally diurnal, but largely crepuscular lifestyle. Similarly, the ratio of cones to rods in M. namaquensis (1:12.4) reflected its nocturnal lifestyle. Similar rod density peaks were observed (R. pumilio: ~84467/mm(2); M. namaquensis: ~81088/mm(2)), but a density gradient yielded higher values in the central (~56618/mm(2)) rather than in the peripheral retinal region (~32689/mm(2)) in R. pumilio. Two separate cone types (S-cones and M/L-cones) were identified implying dichromatic color vision in the study species. In M. namaquensis, both cone populations showed a centro-peripheral density gradient and a consistent S- to M/L-cone ratio (~1:7.8). In R. pumilio, S cones showed a centro-peripheral gradient (S- to M/L-cone ratio; central: 1:7.8; peripheral: 1:6.8) which appeared to form a visual streak, and a specialized area of M/L-cones (S- to M/L-cone ratio: 1:15) was observed inferior to the optic nerve. The number of photoreceptors per linear degree of visual angle, estimated from peak photoreceptor densities and eye size, were four cones and 15 rods per degree in M. namaquensis and 11 cones and 12 rods per degree in R. pumilio. Thus, in nocturnal M. namaquensis rods provide much finer image sampling than cones, whereas in diurnal/crepuscular R. pumilio both photoreceptor types provide fine image sampling. IpRGCs were comparably sparse in R. pumilio (total = 1012) and M. namaquensis (total = 862), but were homogeneously distributed in M. namaquensis and densest in the dorso-nasal quadrant in R. pumilio. The adaptive significance of the latter needs further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6084985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60849852018-08-18 The topography of rods, cones and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in the retinas of a nocturnal (Micaelamys namaquensis) and a diurnal (Rhabdomys pumilio) rodent van der Merwe, Ingrid Lukáts, Ákos Bláhová, Veronika Oosthuizen, Maria K. Bennett, Nigel C. Němec, Pavel PLoS One Research Article We used immunocytochemistry to determine the presence and topographical density distributions of rods, cones, and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) in the four-striped field mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio) and the Namaqua rock mouse (Micaelamys namaquensis). Both species possessed duplex retinas that were rod dominated. In R. pumilio, the density of both cones and rods were high (cone to rod ratio: 1:1.23) and reflected the species’ fundamentally diurnal, but largely crepuscular lifestyle. Similarly, the ratio of cones to rods in M. namaquensis (1:12.4) reflected its nocturnal lifestyle. Similar rod density peaks were observed (R. pumilio: ~84467/mm(2); M. namaquensis: ~81088/mm(2)), but a density gradient yielded higher values in the central (~56618/mm(2)) rather than in the peripheral retinal region (~32689/mm(2)) in R. pumilio. Two separate cone types (S-cones and M/L-cones) were identified implying dichromatic color vision in the study species. In M. namaquensis, both cone populations showed a centro-peripheral density gradient and a consistent S- to M/L-cone ratio (~1:7.8). In R. pumilio, S cones showed a centro-peripheral gradient (S- to M/L-cone ratio; central: 1:7.8; peripheral: 1:6.8) which appeared to form a visual streak, and a specialized area of M/L-cones (S- to M/L-cone ratio: 1:15) was observed inferior to the optic nerve. The number of photoreceptors per linear degree of visual angle, estimated from peak photoreceptor densities and eye size, were four cones and 15 rods per degree in M. namaquensis and 11 cones and 12 rods per degree in R. pumilio. Thus, in nocturnal M. namaquensis rods provide much finer image sampling than cones, whereas in diurnal/crepuscular R. pumilio both photoreceptor types provide fine image sampling. IpRGCs were comparably sparse in R. pumilio (total = 1012) and M. namaquensis (total = 862), but were homogeneously distributed in M. namaquensis and densest in the dorso-nasal quadrant in R. pumilio. The adaptive significance of the latter needs further investigation. Public Library of Science 2018-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6084985/ /pubmed/30092025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202106 Text en © 2018 van der Merwe et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van der Merwe, Ingrid
Lukáts, Ákos
Bláhová, Veronika
Oosthuizen, Maria K.
Bennett, Nigel C.
Němec, Pavel
The topography of rods, cones and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in the retinas of a nocturnal (Micaelamys namaquensis) and a diurnal (Rhabdomys pumilio) rodent
title The topography of rods, cones and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in the retinas of a nocturnal (Micaelamys namaquensis) and a diurnal (Rhabdomys pumilio) rodent
title_full The topography of rods, cones and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in the retinas of a nocturnal (Micaelamys namaquensis) and a diurnal (Rhabdomys pumilio) rodent
title_fullStr The topography of rods, cones and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in the retinas of a nocturnal (Micaelamys namaquensis) and a diurnal (Rhabdomys pumilio) rodent
title_full_unstemmed The topography of rods, cones and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in the retinas of a nocturnal (Micaelamys namaquensis) and a diurnal (Rhabdomys pumilio) rodent
title_short The topography of rods, cones and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in the retinas of a nocturnal (Micaelamys namaquensis) and a diurnal (Rhabdomys pumilio) rodent
title_sort topography of rods, cones and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in the retinas of a nocturnal (micaelamys namaquensis) and a diurnal (rhabdomys pumilio) rodent
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6084985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30092025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202106
work_keys_str_mv AT vandermerweingrid thetopographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent
AT lukatsakos thetopographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent
AT blahovaveronika thetopographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent
AT oosthuizenmariak thetopographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent
AT bennettnigelc thetopographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent
AT nemecpavel thetopographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent
AT vandermerweingrid topographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent
AT lukatsakos topographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent
AT blahovaveronika topographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent
AT oosthuizenmariak topographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent
AT bennettnigelc topographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent
AT nemecpavel topographyofrodsconesandintrinsicallyphotosensitiveretinalganglioncellsintheretinasofanocturnalmicaelamysnamaquensisandadiurnalrhabdomyspumiliorodent