Cargando…

Comparison of Ocular Biometry Using New Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography-based Optical Biometer with Other Devices

PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement between optical biometry with swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometry (IOLMaster 700) and other devices. METHODS: A total of 137 eyes (78 patients) with cataracts were included in this retrospective study. Axial length (AL), anterior chambe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Young Joo, Lim, Tae Hyung, Choi, Kee Yong, Cho, Beom Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6085186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30091303
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2017.0091
_version_ 1783346282187718656
author Cho, Young Joo
Lim, Tae Hyung
Choi, Kee Yong
Cho, Beom Jin
author_facet Cho, Young Joo
Lim, Tae Hyung
Choi, Kee Yong
Cho, Beom Jin
author_sort Cho, Young Joo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement between optical biometry with swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometry (IOLMaster 700) and other devices. METHODS: A total of 137 eyes (78 patients) with cataracts were included in this retrospective study. Axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), keratometry, and white-to-white (WTW) distance measured using IOLMaster 700 were compared with results for the following five different biometers: IOLMaster 500, A-scan, automated refractor, manual keratometry, and Galilei G4. Differences and correlations among the devices were assessed using the Bland-Altman plot and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: For AL values, the IOLMaster 700, IOLMaster 500, and A-scan measurements showed excellent agreement (all ICC >0.99). For ACD values, ICC of IOLMaster 700 and Galilei G4 was 0.965 but A-scan was poorly correlated with either IOLMaster 700 or Galilei G4. The ICCs of IOLMaster 700 and other devices were all greater than 0.9 for average keratometry, but those of the mean cylinder keratometry were all between 0.7 and 0.8. The mean difference in the WTW distance between the IOLMaster 700 and Galilei G4 was 0.029 mm, but the ICC was 0.525. AL measurements were not possible for 10 eyes with the IOLMaster 500 but were obtained in all eyes with the IOLMaster 700. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, AL, ACD, and average keratometry values of IOLMaster 700 can be used interchangeably with those of the other devices tested. However, the ACD value between IOLMaster 700 and A-scan or the WTW distance between IOLMaster 700 and Galilei G4 are not interchangeable because of clinical and statistical differences in measurements between the devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6085186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Ophthalmological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60851862018-08-14 Comparison of Ocular Biometry Using New Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography-based Optical Biometer with Other Devices Cho, Young Joo Lim, Tae Hyung Choi, Kee Yong Cho, Beom Jin Korean J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement between optical biometry with swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometry (IOLMaster 700) and other devices. METHODS: A total of 137 eyes (78 patients) with cataracts were included in this retrospective study. Axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), keratometry, and white-to-white (WTW) distance measured using IOLMaster 700 were compared with results for the following five different biometers: IOLMaster 500, A-scan, automated refractor, manual keratometry, and Galilei G4. Differences and correlations among the devices were assessed using the Bland-Altman plot and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: For AL values, the IOLMaster 700, IOLMaster 500, and A-scan measurements showed excellent agreement (all ICC >0.99). For ACD values, ICC of IOLMaster 700 and Galilei G4 was 0.965 but A-scan was poorly correlated with either IOLMaster 700 or Galilei G4. The ICCs of IOLMaster 700 and other devices were all greater than 0.9 for average keratometry, but those of the mean cylinder keratometry were all between 0.7 and 0.8. The mean difference in the WTW distance between the IOLMaster 700 and Galilei G4 was 0.029 mm, but the ICC was 0.525. AL measurements were not possible for 10 eyes with the IOLMaster 500 but were obtained in all eyes with the IOLMaster 700. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, AL, ACD, and average keratometry values of IOLMaster 700 can be used interchangeably with those of the other devices tested. However, the ACD value between IOLMaster 700 and A-scan or the WTW distance between IOLMaster 700 and Galilei G4 are not interchangeable because of clinical and statistical differences in measurements between the devices. The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2018-08 2018-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6085186/ /pubmed/30091303 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2017.0091 Text en © 2018 The Korean Ophthalmological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cho, Young Joo
Lim, Tae Hyung
Choi, Kee Yong
Cho, Beom Jin
Comparison of Ocular Biometry Using New Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography-based Optical Biometer with Other Devices
title Comparison of Ocular Biometry Using New Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography-based Optical Biometer with Other Devices
title_full Comparison of Ocular Biometry Using New Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography-based Optical Biometer with Other Devices
title_fullStr Comparison of Ocular Biometry Using New Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography-based Optical Biometer with Other Devices
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Ocular Biometry Using New Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography-based Optical Biometer with Other Devices
title_short Comparison of Ocular Biometry Using New Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography-based Optical Biometer with Other Devices
title_sort comparison of ocular biometry using new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer with other devices
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6085186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30091303
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2017.0091
work_keys_str_mv AT choyoungjoo comparisonofocularbiometryusingnewsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographybasedopticalbiometerwithotherdevices
AT limtaehyung comparisonofocularbiometryusingnewsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographybasedopticalbiometerwithotherdevices
AT choikeeyong comparisonofocularbiometryusingnewsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographybasedopticalbiometerwithotherdevices
AT chobeomjin comparisonofocularbiometryusingnewsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographybasedopticalbiometerwithotherdevices