Cargando…

A Narrative Review of Four Different New Techniques in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: “Back to the Future” or Another Trend?

Recently, four different operative techniques, referring to the primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair, were described. These are the dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) with Ligamys™, the Bridge-enhanced repair (BEAR), the use of internal brace, and the refixation with suture anch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malahias, Michael-Alexander, Chytas, Dimitrios, Nakamura, Kaori, Raoulis, Vasileios, Yokota, Masashi, Nikolaou, Vasileios S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6085215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0145-0
_version_ 1783346288188719104
author Malahias, Michael-Alexander
Chytas, Dimitrios
Nakamura, Kaori
Raoulis, Vasileios
Yokota, Masashi
Nikolaou, Vasileios S.
author_facet Malahias, Michael-Alexander
Chytas, Dimitrios
Nakamura, Kaori
Raoulis, Vasileios
Yokota, Masashi
Nikolaou, Vasileios S.
author_sort Malahias, Michael-Alexander
collection PubMed
description Recently, four different operative techniques, referring to the primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair, were described. These are the dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) with Ligamys™, the Bridge-enhanced repair (BEAR), the use of internal brace, and the refixation with suture anchors. The purpose of this study was to assess the already-published, clinical, and pre-clinical results of those techniques. A literature review was conducted and implemented by three independent researchers. Inclusion criteria were clinical or cadaveric or animal studies about patients suffering from ACL rupture, who were treated with one of those four different arthroscopic techniques of primary ACL repair. There were 10 clinical trials dealing with the different techniques of primary ACL repair and 12 cadaveric or animal studies. The majority of the published clinical trials investigated the dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS), while only four studies referred to the three other surgical techniques. Most of the clinical trials suggested that primary ACL repair should be done during the first 14–21 days after a proximal ACL rupture and not later. Further clinical evidence is needed for the techniques of bridge-enhanced ACL repair, internal brace, and suture anchors ACL refixation in order to support the animal and cadaveric biomechanical studies. Till now, the existing clinical trials were not enough to establish the use of those techniques in the ACL-ruptured patients. On the contrary, the Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization with Ligamys™ device demonstrated very promising results in different types of clinical studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6085215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60852152018-08-24 A Narrative Review of Four Different New Techniques in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: “Back to the Future” or Another Trend? Malahias, Michael-Alexander Chytas, Dimitrios Nakamura, Kaori Raoulis, Vasileios Yokota, Masashi Nikolaou, Vasileios S. Sports Med Open Review Article Recently, four different operative techniques, referring to the primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair, were described. These are the dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) with Ligamys™, the Bridge-enhanced repair (BEAR), the use of internal brace, and the refixation with suture anchors. The purpose of this study was to assess the already-published, clinical, and pre-clinical results of those techniques. A literature review was conducted and implemented by three independent researchers. Inclusion criteria were clinical or cadaveric or animal studies about patients suffering from ACL rupture, who were treated with one of those four different arthroscopic techniques of primary ACL repair. There were 10 clinical trials dealing with the different techniques of primary ACL repair and 12 cadaveric or animal studies. The majority of the published clinical trials investigated the dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS), while only four studies referred to the three other surgical techniques. Most of the clinical trials suggested that primary ACL repair should be done during the first 14–21 days after a proximal ACL rupture and not later. Further clinical evidence is needed for the techniques of bridge-enhanced ACL repair, internal brace, and suture anchors ACL refixation in order to support the animal and cadaveric biomechanical studies. Till now, the existing clinical trials were not enough to establish the use of those techniques in the ACL-ruptured patients. On the contrary, the Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization with Ligamys™ device demonstrated very promising results in different types of clinical studies. Springer International Publishing 2018-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6085215/ /pubmed/30094753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0145-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
Malahias, Michael-Alexander
Chytas, Dimitrios
Nakamura, Kaori
Raoulis, Vasileios
Yokota, Masashi
Nikolaou, Vasileios S.
A Narrative Review of Four Different New Techniques in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: “Back to the Future” or Another Trend?
title A Narrative Review of Four Different New Techniques in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: “Back to the Future” or Another Trend?
title_full A Narrative Review of Four Different New Techniques in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: “Back to the Future” or Another Trend?
title_fullStr A Narrative Review of Four Different New Techniques in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: “Back to the Future” or Another Trend?
title_full_unstemmed A Narrative Review of Four Different New Techniques in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: “Back to the Future” or Another Trend?
title_short A Narrative Review of Four Different New Techniques in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: “Back to the Future” or Another Trend?
title_sort narrative review of four different new techniques in primary anterior cruciate ligament repair: “back to the future” or another trend?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6085215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0145-0
work_keys_str_mv AT malahiasmichaelalexander anarrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend
AT chytasdimitrios anarrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend
AT nakamurakaori anarrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend
AT raoulisvasileios anarrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend
AT yokotamasashi anarrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend
AT nikolaouvasileioss anarrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend
AT malahiasmichaelalexander narrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend
AT chytasdimitrios narrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend
AT nakamurakaori narrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend
AT raoulisvasileios narrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend
AT yokotamasashi narrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend
AT nikolaouvasileioss narrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend