Cargando…
A Narrative Review of Four Different New Techniques in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: “Back to the Future” or Another Trend?
Recently, four different operative techniques, referring to the primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair, were described. These are the dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) with Ligamys™, the Bridge-enhanced repair (BEAR), the use of internal brace, and the refixation with suture anch...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6085215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0145-0 |
_version_ | 1783346288188719104 |
---|---|
author | Malahias, Michael-Alexander Chytas, Dimitrios Nakamura, Kaori Raoulis, Vasileios Yokota, Masashi Nikolaou, Vasileios S. |
author_facet | Malahias, Michael-Alexander Chytas, Dimitrios Nakamura, Kaori Raoulis, Vasileios Yokota, Masashi Nikolaou, Vasileios S. |
author_sort | Malahias, Michael-Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recently, four different operative techniques, referring to the primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair, were described. These are the dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) with Ligamys™, the Bridge-enhanced repair (BEAR), the use of internal brace, and the refixation with suture anchors. The purpose of this study was to assess the already-published, clinical, and pre-clinical results of those techniques. A literature review was conducted and implemented by three independent researchers. Inclusion criteria were clinical or cadaveric or animal studies about patients suffering from ACL rupture, who were treated with one of those four different arthroscopic techniques of primary ACL repair. There were 10 clinical trials dealing with the different techniques of primary ACL repair and 12 cadaveric or animal studies. The majority of the published clinical trials investigated the dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS), while only four studies referred to the three other surgical techniques. Most of the clinical trials suggested that primary ACL repair should be done during the first 14–21 days after a proximal ACL rupture and not later. Further clinical evidence is needed for the techniques of bridge-enhanced ACL repair, internal brace, and suture anchors ACL refixation in order to support the animal and cadaveric biomechanical studies. Till now, the existing clinical trials were not enough to establish the use of those techniques in the ACL-ruptured patients. On the contrary, the Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization with Ligamys™ device demonstrated very promising results in different types of clinical studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6085215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60852152018-08-24 A Narrative Review of Four Different New Techniques in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: “Back to the Future” or Another Trend? Malahias, Michael-Alexander Chytas, Dimitrios Nakamura, Kaori Raoulis, Vasileios Yokota, Masashi Nikolaou, Vasileios S. Sports Med Open Review Article Recently, four different operative techniques, referring to the primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair, were described. These are the dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) with Ligamys™, the Bridge-enhanced repair (BEAR), the use of internal brace, and the refixation with suture anchors. The purpose of this study was to assess the already-published, clinical, and pre-clinical results of those techniques. A literature review was conducted and implemented by three independent researchers. Inclusion criteria were clinical or cadaveric or animal studies about patients suffering from ACL rupture, who were treated with one of those four different arthroscopic techniques of primary ACL repair. There were 10 clinical trials dealing with the different techniques of primary ACL repair and 12 cadaveric or animal studies. The majority of the published clinical trials investigated the dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS), while only four studies referred to the three other surgical techniques. Most of the clinical trials suggested that primary ACL repair should be done during the first 14–21 days after a proximal ACL rupture and not later. Further clinical evidence is needed for the techniques of bridge-enhanced ACL repair, internal brace, and suture anchors ACL refixation in order to support the animal and cadaveric biomechanical studies. Till now, the existing clinical trials were not enough to establish the use of those techniques in the ACL-ruptured patients. On the contrary, the Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization with Ligamys™ device demonstrated very promising results in different types of clinical studies. Springer International Publishing 2018-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6085215/ /pubmed/30094753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0145-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Malahias, Michael-Alexander Chytas, Dimitrios Nakamura, Kaori Raoulis, Vasileios Yokota, Masashi Nikolaou, Vasileios S. A Narrative Review of Four Different New Techniques in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: “Back to the Future” or Another Trend? |
title | A Narrative Review of Four Different New Techniques in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: “Back to the Future” or Another Trend? |
title_full | A Narrative Review of Four Different New Techniques in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: “Back to the Future” or Another Trend? |
title_fullStr | A Narrative Review of Four Different New Techniques in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: “Back to the Future” or Another Trend? |
title_full_unstemmed | A Narrative Review of Four Different New Techniques in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: “Back to the Future” or Another Trend? |
title_short | A Narrative Review of Four Different New Techniques in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: “Back to the Future” or Another Trend? |
title_sort | narrative review of four different new techniques in primary anterior cruciate ligament repair: “back to the future” or another trend? |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6085215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0145-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malahiasmichaelalexander anarrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend AT chytasdimitrios anarrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend AT nakamurakaori anarrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend AT raoulisvasileios anarrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend AT yokotamasashi anarrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend AT nikolaouvasileioss anarrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend AT malahiasmichaelalexander narrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend AT chytasdimitrios narrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend AT nakamurakaori narrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend AT raoulisvasileios narrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend AT yokotamasashi narrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend AT nikolaouvasileioss narrativereviewoffourdifferentnewtechniquesinprimaryanteriorcruciateligamentrepairbacktothefutureoranothertrend |