Cargando…
Intracortical facilitation within the migraine motor cortex depends on the stimulation intensity. A paired-pulse TMS study
INTRODUCTION: Connectivity within the primary motor cortex can be measured using the paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paradigm. This evaluates the effect of a first conditioning stimulus on the motor evoked potential (MEP) elicited by a second test stimulus when different interst...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6085216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0897-4 |
_version_ | 1783346288443523072 |
---|---|
author | Cosentino, Giuseppe Di Marco, Salvatore Ferlisi, Salvatore Valentino, Francesca Capitano, Walter M. Fierro, Brigida Brighina, Filippo |
author_facet | Cosentino, Giuseppe Di Marco, Salvatore Ferlisi, Salvatore Valentino, Francesca Capitano, Walter M. Fierro, Brigida Brighina, Filippo |
author_sort | Cosentino, Giuseppe |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Connectivity within the primary motor cortex can be measured using the paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paradigm. This evaluates the effect of a first conditioning stimulus on the motor evoked potential (MEP) elicited by a second test stimulus when different interstimulus intervals are used. Aim of the present study was to provide, in patients suffering from migraine without aura (MwoA), additional information on intracortical facilitation (ICF), short intracortical inhibition (SICI), and long intracortical inhibition (LICI), using different intensities of the test stimulus (TS). METHODS: We enrolled 24 patients with episodic MwoA and 24 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers. Both patients and controls were randomly assigned to two different experimental groups: the first group underwent evaluation of ICF, while in the second group we assessed SICI and LICI. All these measures were assessed by using three different suprathreshold intensities of the TS (110%, 130% and 150% of the resting motor threshold, RMT). Interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 10 ms were used for testing ICF, while SICI and LICI were carried out by using 2 ms and 100 ms ISIs respectively. All migraine patients underwent the experimental protocol while in the interictal pain-free state. RESULTS: A main finding of the study was that an increased ICF could be seen in migraineurs as compared to the healthy subjects only by using a 110% intensity of the TS. Instead, no significant differences were observed between patients and controls as regards both measures of intracortical inhibition. CONCLUSION: We show that hyperresponsivity of the glutamatergic intracortical circuits can be detected in the migraine motor cortex only by applying a low suprathreshold intensity of stimulation. Our results strengthen the notion that, to be reliable, the assessment of cortical excitability in migraine should always include evaluation of the cortical response to different stimulation intensities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6085216 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60852162018-08-24 Intracortical facilitation within the migraine motor cortex depends on the stimulation intensity. A paired-pulse TMS study Cosentino, Giuseppe Di Marco, Salvatore Ferlisi, Salvatore Valentino, Francesca Capitano, Walter M. Fierro, Brigida Brighina, Filippo J Headache Pain Research Article INTRODUCTION: Connectivity within the primary motor cortex can be measured using the paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paradigm. This evaluates the effect of a first conditioning stimulus on the motor evoked potential (MEP) elicited by a second test stimulus when different interstimulus intervals are used. Aim of the present study was to provide, in patients suffering from migraine without aura (MwoA), additional information on intracortical facilitation (ICF), short intracortical inhibition (SICI), and long intracortical inhibition (LICI), using different intensities of the test stimulus (TS). METHODS: We enrolled 24 patients with episodic MwoA and 24 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers. Both patients and controls were randomly assigned to two different experimental groups: the first group underwent evaluation of ICF, while in the second group we assessed SICI and LICI. All these measures were assessed by using three different suprathreshold intensities of the TS (110%, 130% and 150% of the resting motor threshold, RMT). Interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 10 ms were used for testing ICF, while SICI and LICI were carried out by using 2 ms and 100 ms ISIs respectively. All migraine patients underwent the experimental protocol while in the interictal pain-free state. RESULTS: A main finding of the study was that an increased ICF could be seen in migraineurs as compared to the healthy subjects only by using a 110% intensity of the TS. Instead, no significant differences were observed between patients and controls as regards both measures of intracortical inhibition. CONCLUSION: We show that hyperresponsivity of the glutamatergic intracortical circuits can be detected in the migraine motor cortex only by applying a low suprathreshold intensity of stimulation. Our results strengthen the notion that, to be reliable, the assessment of cortical excitability in migraine should always include evaluation of the cortical response to different stimulation intensities. Springer Milan 2018-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6085216/ /pubmed/30094517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0897-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cosentino, Giuseppe Di Marco, Salvatore Ferlisi, Salvatore Valentino, Francesca Capitano, Walter M. Fierro, Brigida Brighina, Filippo Intracortical facilitation within the migraine motor cortex depends on the stimulation intensity. A paired-pulse TMS study |
title | Intracortical facilitation within the migraine motor cortex depends on the stimulation intensity. A paired-pulse TMS study |
title_full | Intracortical facilitation within the migraine motor cortex depends on the stimulation intensity. A paired-pulse TMS study |
title_fullStr | Intracortical facilitation within the migraine motor cortex depends on the stimulation intensity. A paired-pulse TMS study |
title_full_unstemmed | Intracortical facilitation within the migraine motor cortex depends on the stimulation intensity. A paired-pulse TMS study |
title_short | Intracortical facilitation within the migraine motor cortex depends on the stimulation intensity. A paired-pulse TMS study |
title_sort | intracortical facilitation within the migraine motor cortex depends on the stimulation intensity. a paired-pulse tms study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6085216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30094517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-018-0897-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cosentinogiuseppe intracorticalfacilitationwithinthemigrainemotorcortexdependsonthestimulationintensityapairedpulsetmsstudy AT dimarcosalvatore intracorticalfacilitationwithinthemigrainemotorcortexdependsonthestimulationintensityapairedpulsetmsstudy AT ferlisisalvatore intracorticalfacilitationwithinthemigrainemotorcortexdependsonthestimulationintensityapairedpulsetmsstudy AT valentinofrancesca intracorticalfacilitationwithinthemigrainemotorcortexdependsonthestimulationintensityapairedpulsetmsstudy AT capitanowalterm intracorticalfacilitationwithinthemigrainemotorcortexdependsonthestimulationintensityapairedpulsetmsstudy AT fierrobrigida intracorticalfacilitationwithinthemigrainemotorcortexdependsonthestimulationintensityapairedpulsetmsstudy AT brighinafilippo intracorticalfacilitationwithinthemigrainemotorcortexdependsonthestimulationintensityapairedpulsetmsstudy |