Cargando…
Recurrent Penile Fracture—Case Report and Alternative Surgical Approach
INTRODUCTION: Penile refracture is an exceedingly rare event, with very few published studies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case in the literature of penile fracture with 3 same-site recurrences. AIMS: To describe the case of a 25-year-old Caucasian man with recurrent p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6085271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29731370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2018.01.005 |
_version_ | 1783346292901019648 |
---|---|
author | Nascimento, Bruno Guglielmetti, Giuliano B. Miranda, Eduardo P. Ivanovic, Renato F. Batagello, Carlos A. Nahas, William C. Srougi, Miguel Cury, José |
author_facet | Nascimento, Bruno Guglielmetti, Giuliano B. Miranda, Eduardo P. Ivanovic, Renato F. Batagello, Carlos A. Nahas, William C. Srougi, Miguel Cury, José |
author_sort | Nascimento, Bruno |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Penile refracture is an exceedingly rare event, with very few published studies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case in the literature of penile fracture with 3 same-site recurrences. AIMS: To describe the case of a 25-year-old Caucasian man with recurrent penile fracture ultimately treated with resuture and patch reinforcement. METHODS: Patient history (clinical and surgical) and literature review. RESULTS: After the 3rd same-site recurrence, patch reinforcement over the sutured area was performed. The patient had an uneventful recovery and no recurrences to date. CONCLUSION: There is no evidence indicating the superiority of non-absorbable sutures. Bovine pericardium reinforcement over the sutured area was used to minimize the chance of another recurrence. More studies are necessary to investigate its safety and efficacy in this scenario. Nascimento B, Guglielmetti GB, Miranda EP, et al. Recurrent Penile Fracture—Case Report and Alternative Surgical Approach. Sex Med 2018;6:263–266. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6085271 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60852712018-08-10 Recurrent Penile Fracture—Case Report and Alternative Surgical Approach Nascimento, Bruno Guglielmetti, Giuliano B. Miranda, Eduardo P. Ivanovic, Renato F. Batagello, Carlos A. Nahas, William C. Srougi, Miguel Cury, José Sex Med Case Report INTRODUCTION: Penile refracture is an exceedingly rare event, with very few published studies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case in the literature of penile fracture with 3 same-site recurrences. AIMS: To describe the case of a 25-year-old Caucasian man with recurrent penile fracture ultimately treated with resuture and patch reinforcement. METHODS: Patient history (clinical and surgical) and literature review. RESULTS: After the 3rd same-site recurrence, patch reinforcement over the sutured area was performed. The patient had an uneventful recovery and no recurrences to date. CONCLUSION: There is no evidence indicating the superiority of non-absorbable sutures. Bovine pericardium reinforcement over the sutured area was used to minimize the chance of another recurrence. More studies are necessary to investigate its safety and efficacy in this scenario. Nascimento B, Guglielmetti GB, Miranda EP, et al. Recurrent Penile Fracture—Case Report and Alternative Surgical Approach. Sex Med 2018;6:263–266. Elsevier 2018-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6085271/ /pubmed/29731370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2018.01.005 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Case Report Nascimento, Bruno Guglielmetti, Giuliano B. Miranda, Eduardo P. Ivanovic, Renato F. Batagello, Carlos A. Nahas, William C. Srougi, Miguel Cury, José Recurrent Penile Fracture—Case Report and Alternative Surgical Approach |
title | Recurrent Penile Fracture—Case Report and Alternative Surgical Approach |
title_full | Recurrent Penile Fracture—Case Report and Alternative Surgical Approach |
title_fullStr | Recurrent Penile Fracture—Case Report and Alternative Surgical Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Recurrent Penile Fracture—Case Report and Alternative Surgical Approach |
title_short | Recurrent Penile Fracture—Case Report and Alternative Surgical Approach |
title_sort | recurrent penile fracture—case report and alternative surgical approach |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6085271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29731370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2018.01.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nascimentobruno recurrentpenilefracturecasereportandalternativesurgicalapproach AT guglielmettigiulianob recurrentpenilefracturecasereportandalternativesurgicalapproach AT mirandaeduardop recurrentpenilefracturecasereportandalternativesurgicalapproach AT ivanovicrenatof recurrentpenilefracturecasereportandalternativesurgicalapproach AT batagellocarlosa recurrentpenilefracturecasereportandalternativesurgicalapproach AT nahaswilliamc recurrentpenilefracturecasereportandalternativesurgicalapproach AT srougimiguel recurrentpenilefracturecasereportandalternativesurgicalapproach AT curyjose recurrentpenilefracturecasereportandalternativesurgicalapproach |