Cargando…

Recurrent Penile Fracture—Case Report and Alternative Surgical Approach

INTRODUCTION: Penile refracture is an exceedingly rare event, with very few published studies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case in the literature of penile fracture with 3 same-site recurrences. AIMS: To describe the case of a 25-year-old Caucasian man with recurrent p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nascimento, Bruno, Guglielmetti, Giuliano B., Miranda, Eduardo P., Ivanovic, Renato F., Batagello, Carlos A., Nahas, William C., Srougi, Miguel, Cury, José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6085271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29731370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2018.01.005
_version_ 1783346292901019648
author Nascimento, Bruno
Guglielmetti, Giuliano B.
Miranda, Eduardo P.
Ivanovic, Renato F.
Batagello, Carlos A.
Nahas, William C.
Srougi, Miguel
Cury, José
author_facet Nascimento, Bruno
Guglielmetti, Giuliano B.
Miranda, Eduardo P.
Ivanovic, Renato F.
Batagello, Carlos A.
Nahas, William C.
Srougi, Miguel
Cury, José
author_sort Nascimento, Bruno
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Penile refracture is an exceedingly rare event, with very few published studies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case in the literature of penile fracture with 3 same-site recurrences. AIMS: To describe the case of a 25-year-old Caucasian man with recurrent penile fracture ultimately treated with resuture and patch reinforcement. METHODS: Patient history (clinical and surgical) and literature review. RESULTS: After the 3rd same-site recurrence, patch reinforcement over the sutured area was performed. The patient had an uneventful recovery and no recurrences to date. CONCLUSION: There is no evidence indicating the superiority of non-absorbable sutures. Bovine pericardium reinforcement over the sutured area was used to minimize the chance of another recurrence. More studies are necessary to investigate its safety and efficacy in this scenario. Nascimento B, Guglielmetti GB, Miranda EP, et al. Recurrent Penile Fracture—Case Report and Alternative Surgical Approach. Sex Med 2018;6:263–266.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6085271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60852712018-08-10 Recurrent Penile Fracture—Case Report and Alternative Surgical Approach Nascimento, Bruno Guglielmetti, Giuliano B. Miranda, Eduardo P. Ivanovic, Renato F. Batagello, Carlos A. Nahas, William C. Srougi, Miguel Cury, José Sex Med Case Report INTRODUCTION: Penile refracture is an exceedingly rare event, with very few published studies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case in the literature of penile fracture with 3 same-site recurrences. AIMS: To describe the case of a 25-year-old Caucasian man with recurrent penile fracture ultimately treated with resuture and patch reinforcement. METHODS: Patient history (clinical and surgical) and literature review. RESULTS: After the 3rd same-site recurrence, patch reinforcement over the sutured area was performed. The patient had an uneventful recovery and no recurrences to date. CONCLUSION: There is no evidence indicating the superiority of non-absorbable sutures. Bovine pericardium reinforcement over the sutured area was used to minimize the chance of another recurrence. More studies are necessary to investigate its safety and efficacy in this scenario. Nascimento B, Guglielmetti GB, Miranda EP, et al. Recurrent Penile Fracture—Case Report and Alternative Surgical Approach. Sex Med 2018;6:263–266. Elsevier 2018-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6085271/ /pubmed/29731370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2018.01.005 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Nascimento, Bruno
Guglielmetti, Giuliano B.
Miranda, Eduardo P.
Ivanovic, Renato F.
Batagello, Carlos A.
Nahas, William C.
Srougi, Miguel
Cury, José
Recurrent Penile Fracture—Case Report and Alternative Surgical Approach
title Recurrent Penile Fracture—Case Report and Alternative Surgical Approach
title_full Recurrent Penile Fracture—Case Report and Alternative Surgical Approach
title_fullStr Recurrent Penile Fracture—Case Report and Alternative Surgical Approach
title_full_unstemmed Recurrent Penile Fracture—Case Report and Alternative Surgical Approach
title_short Recurrent Penile Fracture—Case Report and Alternative Surgical Approach
title_sort recurrent penile fracture—case report and alternative surgical approach
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6085271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29731370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2018.01.005
work_keys_str_mv AT nascimentobruno recurrentpenilefracturecasereportandalternativesurgicalapproach
AT guglielmettigiulianob recurrentpenilefracturecasereportandalternativesurgicalapproach
AT mirandaeduardop recurrentpenilefracturecasereportandalternativesurgicalapproach
AT ivanovicrenatof recurrentpenilefracturecasereportandalternativesurgicalapproach
AT batagellocarlosa recurrentpenilefracturecasereportandalternativesurgicalapproach
AT nahaswilliamc recurrentpenilefracturecasereportandalternativesurgicalapproach
AT srougimiguel recurrentpenilefracturecasereportandalternativesurgicalapproach
AT curyjose recurrentpenilefracturecasereportandalternativesurgicalapproach