Cargando…

Primary health Centres’ performance assessment measures in developing countries: review of the empirical literature

BACKGROUND: It is universally accepted that primary healthcare is essential for achieving public health and that assessment of its performance is critical for continuous improvement. The World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) framework for performance assessment is a comprehensive global standard, but...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bangalore Sathyananda, R., de Rijk, A., Manjunath, U., Krumeich, A., van Schayck, C. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6085632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30092842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3423-0
_version_ 1783346372191191040
author Bangalore Sathyananda, R.
de Rijk, A.
Manjunath, U.
Krumeich, A.
van Schayck, C. P.
author_facet Bangalore Sathyananda, R.
de Rijk, A.
Manjunath, U.
Krumeich, A.
van Schayck, C. P.
author_sort Bangalore Sathyananda, R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is universally accepted that primary healthcare is essential for achieving public health and that assessment of its performance is critical for continuous improvement. The World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) framework for performance assessment is a comprehensive global standard, but difficult to apply in developing countries because of financial and data constraints. This study aims to review the empirical literature on measures for Primary Health Centre (PHC) performance assessment in developing countries, and compare them for comprehensiveness with the aspects described by the WHO Framework. METHODS: Research articles published in English scientific journals between January 1979 and October 2016 were reviewed systematically. The reporting quality of the article and the quality of the measures were assessed with instruments adapted for the purpose of this study. Data was categorized and described. RESULTS: Fifteen articles were included in the study out of 4359 articles reviewed. Nine articles used quantitative methods, one article used qualitative methods exclusively and five used mixed methods. Fourteen articles had a good description of the measurement properties. None of the articles presented validity tests of the measures but eleven articles presented measures that were well established. Mostly studies included components of personnel competencies (skilled/ non-skilled) and centre performance (patient satisfaction/cost /efficiency). CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to the WHO framework, the measures in the articles were limited in scope as they did not represent all service components of PHCs. Hence, PHC performance assessment should include system components along with relevant measures of personnel performance beyond knowledge of protocols. Existing measures for PHC performance assessment in developing countries need to be validated and concise measures for neglected aspects need to be developed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3423-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6085632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60856322018-08-16 Primary health Centres’ performance assessment measures in developing countries: review of the empirical literature Bangalore Sathyananda, R. de Rijk, A. Manjunath, U. Krumeich, A. van Schayck, C. P. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: It is universally accepted that primary healthcare is essential for achieving public health and that assessment of its performance is critical for continuous improvement. The World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) framework for performance assessment is a comprehensive global standard, but difficult to apply in developing countries because of financial and data constraints. This study aims to review the empirical literature on measures for Primary Health Centre (PHC) performance assessment in developing countries, and compare them for comprehensiveness with the aspects described by the WHO Framework. METHODS: Research articles published in English scientific journals between January 1979 and October 2016 were reviewed systematically. The reporting quality of the article and the quality of the measures were assessed with instruments adapted for the purpose of this study. Data was categorized and described. RESULTS: Fifteen articles were included in the study out of 4359 articles reviewed. Nine articles used quantitative methods, one article used qualitative methods exclusively and five used mixed methods. Fourteen articles had a good description of the measurement properties. None of the articles presented validity tests of the measures but eleven articles presented measures that were well established. Mostly studies included components of personnel competencies (skilled/ non-skilled) and centre performance (patient satisfaction/cost /efficiency). CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to the WHO framework, the measures in the articles were limited in scope as they did not represent all service components of PHCs. Hence, PHC performance assessment should include system components along with relevant measures of personnel performance beyond knowledge of protocols. Existing measures for PHC performance assessment in developing countries need to be validated and concise measures for neglected aspects need to be developed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3423-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6085632/ /pubmed/30092842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3423-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bangalore Sathyananda, R.
de Rijk, A.
Manjunath, U.
Krumeich, A.
van Schayck, C. P.
Primary health Centres’ performance assessment measures in developing countries: review of the empirical literature
title Primary health Centres’ performance assessment measures in developing countries: review of the empirical literature
title_full Primary health Centres’ performance assessment measures in developing countries: review of the empirical literature
title_fullStr Primary health Centres’ performance assessment measures in developing countries: review of the empirical literature
title_full_unstemmed Primary health Centres’ performance assessment measures in developing countries: review of the empirical literature
title_short Primary health Centres’ performance assessment measures in developing countries: review of the empirical literature
title_sort primary health centres’ performance assessment measures in developing countries: review of the empirical literature
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6085632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30092842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3423-0
work_keys_str_mv AT bangaloresathyanandar primaryhealthcentresperformanceassessmentmeasuresindevelopingcountriesreviewoftheempiricalliterature
AT derijka primaryhealthcentresperformanceassessmentmeasuresindevelopingcountriesreviewoftheempiricalliterature
AT manjunathu primaryhealthcentresperformanceassessmentmeasuresindevelopingcountriesreviewoftheempiricalliterature
AT krumeicha primaryhealthcentresperformanceassessmentmeasuresindevelopingcountriesreviewoftheempiricalliterature
AT vanschayckcp primaryhealthcentresperformanceassessmentmeasuresindevelopingcountriesreviewoftheempiricalliterature