Cargando…

Performance of a whole-body human dust inhalation challenge exposure chamber

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the performance of a whole-body human dust exposure chamber is presented in this report. METHODS: The volume of the chamber is 2.13 m(3) and it is operated at a flow rate of 1.0 m(3)/min. Makeup and exhaust air were filtered. A Wright Dust Feeder was used to generate fly as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pieretti, Luis F., Hammad, Yehia Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6086143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30105210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.07.004
_version_ 1783346464953466880
author Pieretti, Luis F.
Hammad, Yehia Y.
author_facet Pieretti, Luis F.
Hammad, Yehia Y.
author_sort Pieretti, Luis F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the performance of a whole-body human dust exposure chamber is presented in this report. METHODS: The volume of the chamber is 2.13 m(3) and it is operated at a flow rate of 1.0 m(3)/min. Makeup and exhaust air were filtered. A Wright Dust Feeder was used to generate fly ash, the testing agent. An elutriator was used to maintain particles in the respirable range. A Rupprecht and Patashnick PM-10 TEOM, a direct reading instrument, was used to monitor particle concentration. Particle size distributions were determined by a QCM cascade impactor. The evenness of dust concentrations in the chamber was determined gravimetrically. RESULTS: Dust concentrations measured at different points within the chamber were associated with variability less than 10%. Dust concentrations measured by the TEOM, in μg/m(3), at 0.2, 0.4, 0.8 and 1.6 RPMs of the Wright Dust Feeder, were 110 ± 2.8, 173 ± 8.5, 398 ± 20 and 550 ± 17, respectively. Particle size distributions (MMD and GSD) were 1.27 μm and 2.35, 1.39 and 2.22, 1.46 and 2.08, 1.15 and 2.2, respectively. Total dust concentrations measured gravimetrically in μg/m(3), were 135 ± 21, 200 ± 35, 333 ± 18 and 891 ± 27, respectively. CONCLUSION: The whole-body human exposure chamber offers several advantages and has better performance than most of the inhalation challenge systems previously described.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6086143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60861432018-08-13 Performance of a whole-body human dust inhalation challenge exposure chamber Pieretti, Luis F. Hammad, Yehia Y. Toxicol Rep Article BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the performance of a whole-body human dust exposure chamber is presented in this report. METHODS: The volume of the chamber is 2.13 m(3) and it is operated at a flow rate of 1.0 m(3)/min. Makeup and exhaust air were filtered. A Wright Dust Feeder was used to generate fly ash, the testing agent. An elutriator was used to maintain particles in the respirable range. A Rupprecht and Patashnick PM-10 TEOM, a direct reading instrument, was used to monitor particle concentration. Particle size distributions were determined by a QCM cascade impactor. The evenness of dust concentrations in the chamber was determined gravimetrically. RESULTS: Dust concentrations measured at different points within the chamber were associated with variability less than 10%. Dust concentrations measured by the TEOM, in μg/m(3), at 0.2, 0.4, 0.8 and 1.6 RPMs of the Wright Dust Feeder, were 110 ± 2.8, 173 ± 8.5, 398 ± 20 and 550 ± 17, respectively. Particle size distributions (MMD and GSD) were 1.27 μm and 2.35, 1.39 and 2.22, 1.46 and 2.08, 1.15 and 2.2, respectively. Total dust concentrations measured gravimetrically in μg/m(3), were 135 ± 21, 200 ± 35, 333 ± 18 and 891 ± 27, respectively. CONCLUSION: The whole-body human exposure chamber offers several advantages and has better performance than most of the inhalation challenge systems previously described. Elsevier 2018-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6086143/ /pubmed/30105210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.07.004 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pieretti, Luis F.
Hammad, Yehia Y.
Performance of a whole-body human dust inhalation challenge exposure chamber
title Performance of a whole-body human dust inhalation challenge exposure chamber
title_full Performance of a whole-body human dust inhalation challenge exposure chamber
title_fullStr Performance of a whole-body human dust inhalation challenge exposure chamber
title_full_unstemmed Performance of a whole-body human dust inhalation challenge exposure chamber
title_short Performance of a whole-body human dust inhalation challenge exposure chamber
title_sort performance of a whole-body human dust inhalation challenge exposure chamber
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6086143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30105210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.07.004
work_keys_str_mv AT pierettiluisf performanceofawholebodyhumandustinhalationchallengeexposurechamber
AT hammadyehiay performanceofawholebodyhumandustinhalationchallengeexposurechamber