Cargando…
Mistake is to Myth What Pretense is to Fiction: A Reply to Goodman
In this reply I defend Kripke’s creationist thesis for mythical objects (Reference and Existence, 2013) against Jeffrey Goodman’s counter-argument to the thesis (“Creatures of fiction, objects of myth”, Analysis, 74(1), 35–40, 2014). I argue that Goodman has mistaken the basis for when mythical abst...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6086246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30147176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11406-017-9812-5 |
_version_ | 1783346480660086784 |
---|---|
author | Lundgren, Björn |
author_facet | Lundgren, Björn |
author_sort | Lundgren, Björn |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this reply I defend Kripke’s creationist thesis for mythical objects (Reference and Existence, 2013) against Jeffrey Goodman’s counter-argument to the thesis (“Creatures of fiction, objects of myth”, Analysis, 74(1), 35–40, 2014). I argue that Goodman has mistaken the basis for when mythical abstracta are created. Contrary to Goodman I show that, as well as how, Kripke’s theory consistently retains the analogy between creation of mythical objects and creation of fictional objects, while also explaining in what way they differ. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6086246 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60862462018-08-23 Mistake is to Myth What Pretense is to Fiction: A Reply to Goodman Lundgren, Björn Philosophia (Ramat Gan) Article In this reply I defend Kripke’s creationist thesis for mythical objects (Reference and Existence, 2013) against Jeffrey Goodman’s counter-argument to the thesis (“Creatures of fiction, objects of myth”, Analysis, 74(1), 35–40, 2014). I argue that Goodman has mistaken the basis for when mythical abstracta are created. Contrary to Goodman I show that, as well as how, Kripke’s theory consistently retains the analogy between creation of mythical objects and creation of fictional objects, while also explaining in what way they differ. Springer Netherlands 2017-03-08 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC6086246/ /pubmed/30147176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11406-017-9812-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Lundgren, Björn Mistake is to Myth What Pretense is to Fiction: A Reply to Goodman |
title | Mistake is to Myth What Pretense is to Fiction: A Reply to Goodman |
title_full | Mistake is to Myth What Pretense is to Fiction: A Reply to Goodman |
title_fullStr | Mistake is to Myth What Pretense is to Fiction: A Reply to Goodman |
title_full_unstemmed | Mistake is to Myth What Pretense is to Fiction: A Reply to Goodman |
title_short | Mistake is to Myth What Pretense is to Fiction: A Reply to Goodman |
title_sort | mistake is to myth what pretense is to fiction: a reply to goodman |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6086246/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30147176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11406-017-9812-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lundgrenbjorn mistakeistomythwhatpretenseistofictionareplytogoodman |