Cargando…
The prognostic significance of lymph node size in node-positive colon cancer
OBJECTIVES: To (i) show the outcome benefits of enlarged lymph nodes in node-positive colon cancer cases, as it was shown previously in negative node cases; (ii) disprove the stage migration theory and (iii) list the factors affecting lymph node size and yield. METHODS: A retrospective study includi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6086396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30096142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201072 |
_version_ | 1783346503726661632 |
---|---|
author | Schrembs, Philipp Martin, Benedikt Anthuber, Matthias Schenkirsch, Gerhard Märkl, Bruno |
author_facet | Schrembs, Philipp Martin, Benedikt Anthuber, Matthias Schenkirsch, Gerhard Märkl, Bruno |
author_sort | Schrembs, Philipp |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To (i) show the outcome benefits of enlarged lymph nodes in node-positive colon cancer cases, as it was shown previously in negative node cases; (ii) disprove the stage migration theory and (iii) list the factors affecting lymph node size and yield. METHODS: A retrospective study including 234 node-positive colon cancer cases was scheduled and performed. All recovered lymph nodes (6969) from 234 cases were microscopically examined in regard to (a) lymph node size (b) presence of metastasis (c) extent of intra-nodal metastasis. On the basis of resulting data, a statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Metastases occurred in all size categories, though more often in larger lymph nodes. Fifty-one percent of all metastasised nodes were 2 to 6 mm in size. Approximately half of all nodes >10 mm were microscopically free of cancer. Cases with a small lymph node metastasis to lymph node size ratio (MSR) had a better prognosis than others: 85 months (95% CI: 72–97) vs. 67 months (95% CI: 47–88), p <0.001 (mean, overall survival). To differentiate between cases with the same ratio but different absolute lymph nodes sizes, we divided the cases into two groups that differed in their number of moderate to large lymph nodes. The group with more moderate to large lymph nodes showed a clear outcome benefit: 104 months (95% CI: 86–122) vs. 66 months (95% CI: 54–77), p = 0.014 (mean, overall survival). CONCLUSIONS: Metastasised lymph nodes affect all size categories, and large lymph nodes are not always metastasised. The combination of enlarged lymph nodes and a small lymph node metastasis to lymph node size ratio (MSR) is associated with a better prognosis than others. When enlarged lymph nodes were considered as surrogate markers of an effective local immune response due to nodal hyperplasia, the immune system could be seen as the confounder affecting both lymph node size and prognosis. Our results are pointing in this direction and, along with other reasons, are challenging the stage migration theory. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6086396 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60863962018-08-28 The prognostic significance of lymph node size in node-positive colon cancer Schrembs, Philipp Martin, Benedikt Anthuber, Matthias Schenkirsch, Gerhard Märkl, Bruno PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To (i) show the outcome benefits of enlarged lymph nodes in node-positive colon cancer cases, as it was shown previously in negative node cases; (ii) disprove the stage migration theory and (iii) list the factors affecting lymph node size and yield. METHODS: A retrospective study including 234 node-positive colon cancer cases was scheduled and performed. All recovered lymph nodes (6969) from 234 cases were microscopically examined in regard to (a) lymph node size (b) presence of metastasis (c) extent of intra-nodal metastasis. On the basis of resulting data, a statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Metastases occurred in all size categories, though more often in larger lymph nodes. Fifty-one percent of all metastasised nodes were 2 to 6 mm in size. Approximately half of all nodes >10 mm were microscopically free of cancer. Cases with a small lymph node metastasis to lymph node size ratio (MSR) had a better prognosis than others: 85 months (95% CI: 72–97) vs. 67 months (95% CI: 47–88), p <0.001 (mean, overall survival). To differentiate between cases with the same ratio but different absolute lymph nodes sizes, we divided the cases into two groups that differed in their number of moderate to large lymph nodes. The group with more moderate to large lymph nodes showed a clear outcome benefit: 104 months (95% CI: 86–122) vs. 66 months (95% CI: 54–77), p = 0.014 (mean, overall survival). CONCLUSIONS: Metastasised lymph nodes affect all size categories, and large lymph nodes are not always metastasised. The combination of enlarged lymph nodes and a small lymph node metastasis to lymph node size ratio (MSR) is associated with a better prognosis than others. When enlarged lymph nodes were considered as surrogate markers of an effective local immune response due to nodal hyperplasia, the immune system could be seen as the confounder affecting both lymph node size and prognosis. Our results are pointing in this direction and, along with other reasons, are challenging the stage migration theory. Public Library of Science 2018-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6086396/ /pubmed/30096142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201072 Text en © 2018 Schrembs et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schrembs, Philipp Martin, Benedikt Anthuber, Matthias Schenkirsch, Gerhard Märkl, Bruno The prognostic significance of lymph node size in node-positive colon cancer |
title | The prognostic significance of lymph node size in node-positive colon cancer |
title_full | The prognostic significance of lymph node size in node-positive colon cancer |
title_fullStr | The prognostic significance of lymph node size in node-positive colon cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | The prognostic significance of lymph node size in node-positive colon cancer |
title_short | The prognostic significance of lymph node size in node-positive colon cancer |
title_sort | prognostic significance of lymph node size in node-positive colon cancer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6086396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30096142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201072 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schrembsphilipp theprognosticsignificanceoflymphnodesizeinnodepositivecoloncancer AT martinbenedikt theprognosticsignificanceoflymphnodesizeinnodepositivecoloncancer AT anthubermatthias theprognosticsignificanceoflymphnodesizeinnodepositivecoloncancer AT schenkirschgerhard theprognosticsignificanceoflymphnodesizeinnodepositivecoloncancer AT marklbruno theprognosticsignificanceoflymphnodesizeinnodepositivecoloncancer AT schrembsphilipp prognosticsignificanceoflymphnodesizeinnodepositivecoloncancer AT martinbenedikt prognosticsignificanceoflymphnodesizeinnodepositivecoloncancer AT anthubermatthias prognosticsignificanceoflymphnodesizeinnodepositivecoloncancer AT schenkirschgerhard prognosticsignificanceoflymphnodesizeinnodepositivecoloncancer AT marklbruno prognosticsignificanceoflymphnodesizeinnodepositivecoloncancer |