Cargando…

The prognostic significance of lymph node size in node-positive colon cancer

OBJECTIVES: To (i) show the outcome benefits of enlarged lymph nodes in node-positive colon cancer cases, as it was shown previously in negative node cases; (ii) disprove the stage migration theory and (iii) list the factors affecting lymph node size and yield. METHODS: A retrospective study includi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schrembs, Philipp, Martin, Benedikt, Anthuber, Matthias, Schenkirsch, Gerhard, Märkl, Bruno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6086396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30096142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201072
_version_ 1783346503726661632
author Schrembs, Philipp
Martin, Benedikt
Anthuber, Matthias
Schenkirsch, Gerhard
Märkl, Bruno
author_facet Schrembs, Philipp
Martin, Benedikt
Anthuber, Matthias
Schenkirsch, Gerhard
Märkl, Bruno
author_sort Schrembs, Philipp
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To (i) show the outcome benefits of enlarged lymph nodes in node-positive colon cancer cases, as it was shown previously in negative node cases; (ii) disprove the stage migration theory and (iii) list the factors affecting lymph node size and yield. METHODS: A retrospective study including 234 node-positive colon cancer cases was scheduled and performed. All recovered lymph nodes (6969) from 234 cases were microscopically examined in regard to (a) lymph node size (b) presence of metastasis (c) extent of intra-nodal metastasis. On the basis of resulting data, a statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Metastases occurred in all size categories, though more often in larger lymph nodes. Fifty-one percent of all metastasised nodes were 2 to 6 mm in size. Approximately half of all nodes >10 mm were microscopically free of cancer. Cases with a small lymph node metastasis to lymph node size ratio (MSR) had a better prognosis than others: 85 months (95% CI: 72–97) vs. 67 months (95% CI: 47–88), p <0.001 (mean, overall survival). To differentiate between cases with the same ratio but different absolute lymph nodes sizes, we divided the cases into two groups that differed in their number of moderate to large lymph nodes. The group with more moderate to large lymph nodes showed a clear outcome benefit: 104 months (95% CI: 86–122) vs. 66 months (95% CI: 54–77), p = 0.014 (mean, overall survival). CONCLUSIONS: Metastasised lymph nodes affect all size categories, and large lymph nodes are not always metastasised. The combination of enlarged lymph nodes and a small lymph node metastasis to lymph node size ratio (MSR) is associated with a better prognosis than others. When enlarged lymph nodes were considered as surrogate markers of an effective local immune response due to nodal hyperplasia, the immune system could be seen as the confounder affecting both lymph node size and prognosis. Our results are pointing in this direction and, along with other reasons, are challenging the stage migration theory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6086396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60863962018-08-28 The prognostic significance of lymph node size in node-positive colon cancer Schrembs, Philipp Martin, Benedikt Anthuber, Matthias Schenkirsch, Gerhard Märkl, Bruno PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To (i) show the outcome benefits of enlarged lymph nodes in node-positive colon cancer cases, as it was shown previously in negative node cases; (ii) disprove the stage migration theory and (iii) list the factors affecting lymph node size and yield. METHODS: A retrospective study including 234 node-positive colon cancer cases was scheduled and performed. All recovered lymph nodes (6969) from 234 cases were microscopically examined in regard to (a) lymph node size (b) presence of metastasis (c) extent of intra-nodal metastasis. On the basis of resulting data, a statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Metastases occurred in all size categories, though more often in larger lymph nodes. Fifty-one percent of all metastasised nodes were 2 to 6 mm in size. Approximately half of all nodes >10 mm were microscopically free of cancer. Cases with a small lymph node metastasis to lymph node size ratio (MSR) had a better prognosis than others: 85 months (95% CI: 72–97) vs. 67 months (95% CI: 47–88), p <0.001 (mean, overall survival). To differentiate between cases with the same ratio but different absolute lymph nodes sizes, we divided the cases into two groups that differed in their number of moderate to large lymph nodes. The group with more moderate to large lymph nodes showed a clear outcome benefit: 104 months (95% CI: 86–122) vs. 66 months (95% CI: 54–77), p = 0.014 (mean, overall survival). CONCLUSIONS: Metastasised lymph nodes affect all size categories, and large lymph nodes are not always metastasised. The combination of enlarged lymph nodes and a small lymph node metastasis to lymph node size ratio (MSR) is associated with a better prognosis than others. When enlarged lymph nodes were considered as surrogate markers of an effective local immune response due to nodal hyperplasia, the immune system could be seen as the confounder affecting both lymph node size and prognosis. Our results are pointing in this direction and, along with other reasons, are challenging the stage migration theory. Public Library of Science 2018-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6086396/ /pubmed/30096142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201072 Text en © 2018 Schrembs et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schrembs, Philipp
Martin, Benedikt
Anthuber, Matthias
Schenkirsch, Gerhard
Märkl, Bruno
The prognostic significance of lymph node size in node-positive colon cancer
title The prognostic significance of lymph node size in node-positive colon cancer
title_full The prognostic significance of lymph node size in node-positive colon cancer
title_fullStr The prognostic significance of lymph node size in node-positive colon cancer
title_full_unstemmed The prognostic significance of lymph node size in node-positive colon cancer
title_short The prognostic significance of lymph node size in node-positive colon cancer
title_sort prognostic significance of lymph node size in node-positive colon cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6086396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30096142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201072
work_keys_str_mv AT schrembsphilipp theprognosticsignificanceoflymphnodesizeinnodepositivecoloncancer
AT martinbenedikt theprognosticsignificanceoflymphnodesizeinnodepositivecoloncancer
AT anthubermatthias theprognosticsignificanceoflymphnodesizeinnodepositivecoloncancer
AT schenkirschgerhard theprognosticsignificanceoflymphnodesizeinnodepositivecoloncancer
AT marklbruno theprognosticsignificanceoflymphnodesizeinnodepositivecoloncancer
AT schrembsphilipp prognosticsignificanceoflymphnodesizeinnodepositivecoloncancer
AT martinbenedikt prognosticsignificanceoflymphnodesizeinnodepositivecoloncancer
AT anthubermatthias prognosticsignificanceoflymphnodesizeinnodepositivecoloncancer
AT schenkirschgerhard prognosticsignificanceoflymphnodesizeinnodepositivecoloncancer
AT marklbruno prognosticsignificanceoflymphnodesizeinnodepositivecoloncancer